Preview

So Free It's Deadly: Thank You For Smoking

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
451 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
So Free It's Deadly: Thank You For Smoking
So Free It's Deadly

The expectation in Thank You for Smoking quarrels the premise of good satire in that everyone is hypocritical and corrupt. Nick Naylor is portrays as a suave and charismatic lobbyist who defends the tobacco industry's daily conflict against anti-smoking protesters, all while being a devoted father to his wide-eyed son.
Since our culture of critical spin has saturated modern America, there has been a great deal of uncertain agreement between the government and private agencies revising our cultural document to excise smoking. The idea of smoking has become the bogeyman of (liberal) American society. In this case Thank You for Smoking illustrates the moral equivalence of politics and ridicules anti-smoking advocates.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thank You for Smoking is a both fierce and sophisticated satire written by Jason Reitman. The moral of the film is on the matter of cigarettes and cancer and how it is associated with the responsibility of choice. Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhart) leads as a lobbyist for Big Tobacco who will fight to protect America’s right to smoke -although it may kill him and others. Nick does not take sides in the matter, but rather spins the situation around in which makes all others wrong. Although the realistic acting and satirical style make the movie intriguing to watch, the plot of the movie is irrational.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking has become a debatable topic in recent years, with everyone having his or her own opinion of the issue. There is a sudden push to get everyone to stop smoking. In her essay "I 'd Rather Smoke than Kiss" Florence King takes on the anti-smokers and the way they are treating smokers today.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This new controversial product falls between our social morals, and our nations devotion to capitalism. For years the United States has put forth an anti-smoking campaign with efforts to de-normalize the use of cigarettes in public spaces. By reviving cigarettes and putting them fresh into our minds through television and radio ads we risk the gain of popularity of smoking in our culture once again.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    From flappers to movie stars, cigarettes became an integral, flexible prop. Cigarettes are a familiar part of the American culture and have been for hundreds of years. Allan M. Brandt author of the book The Cigarette Century, states, “Cigarettes are the product that defined America.” Cigarettes became a popular modern commodity as consumer beliefs developed. The product intertwined and blossomed with the development of American business, advertisement, and consumerism in the modern age. As cigarette consumption skyrocketed, evidence that cigarette smoking, and second hand smoke was dangerous was yet to emerge. Knowledge of the health effects has since had a complex effect on the public and the industry. American policy, industry strategy, and lawsuits concerning cigarettes have all provided windows into governments, industry, and public confrontation with risk, freedom, responsibility, and blame over the course of the last hundred years. Thus is why all Americans have a bias towards cigarette smoke, tobacco companies and products, and because of this, the product oftentimes has an ethical position-somewhat contradictory, as being both a leading cause of cancer and as an appealing product to some.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thank You for Smoking is a criticism of today's "culture of spin". The hero of the film is Nick Naylor (Eckhart), the Chief Spokesman for Big Tobacco whose task was to defend the rights of smokers and cigarette makers while health advertisements and programmes call for stopping smoking which has a relationship with cancer. He knows very well the bad and damaging effects of cigarettes which may lead to death, but he wanted to win against other people’s arguments, as that was his job & duties. That was clearly shown in the scene when he told his young son Joey, "The beauty of an argument is that if you argue correctly, you're never wrong."…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sullum, Jacob. Chapter 7. For Your Own Good: The Anti-smoking Crusade and the Tyranny of Public Health. New York: Free, 1998. 130-31. Print.…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King’s smoking addiction started at the age of 26, relatively late compared to other teenage rebels. She had bought a couple packs of Du Maurier English cigarettes intended for paperclip holders. She emptied out the cigarettes and threw the cigarettes in her drawer. But one day the scattered cigarettes were in her way, so she tried one. Then it was history from there: she smoked everyday ever since. She even talked about how pleasurable it was to have the post-coital cigarette. She misses her smoking sessions with her boyfriend while denouncing non-smokers who she called anti-tobacco puritans. She explained that most Americans are passive, and to get their anti-smoking point across they had to put up signs with a cigarette in a circle slashed with a red diagonal. She criticized public service ads because it exaggerated how gross smoking really is. One anti smoker proclaimed, “Kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray.” King also believes hating smokers is a way to hate old people. Young people can justify hating them because middle aged women usually smoked; they are the ones who watched Bette Davis movies and other classic smoke movies. Therefore, King will always have the attitude of “smoking is cool” implanted in her brain.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cigarette Pacakging

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As Australian society and the community develop throughout the years, many people are opting for healthier food choices, healthier lifestyles, and overall, are just more health conscious. Thus, the issue of smoking cigarettes and the health hazards it engenders has become a popular topic among the public. Recently, in Australia, legislation was passed that requires all cigarettes to be sold in plain green packaging, with no branding. The introduction of this legislation has stirred up much commotion, causing people to voice their opinion through the media. In the opinion article:’ Plain cigarette packaging will change smoking… slowly’, (No Date, The Conversation), Paul Harrison conveys his support for the new legislation, as he believes, from his extended research, that it can help to discourage smoking. On the other hand, Brendan O’Neill displays an opposing viewpoint through his opinion article, ‘Plain packaging is an infringement of free speech’ (26 November 2011, The Australian), suggesting that this new law is yet another one of the government’s ways of suppressing the public’s right to freedom of speech.…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tobacco has been a cash crop in America since the first colonists settled here. In fact, many historians have said America would not exist as we know it without the original routes of tobacco here. While there are significant health risks with tobacco, it is an essential part of the American economy. In 2011, the huge sum of 17,653,708,000 dollars were collected in revenue from taxation on cigarettes (Tobacco Tax Revenue). Apart from this immediate benefit of the taxes, it also dissuades people, particularly youth, to smoke. “Every 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes reduces consumption by about 4 percent among adults and about 7 percent among youth”…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In a study conducted through the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, it was found that between the years of 1998-2006, fifty percent of American children were exposed to second hand smoke on a daily basis. Dave Eggers, having experienced this statistic first-hand, tends to have a very biased but yet unique opinion as to why smokers continue with their habit-- even though they are all well aware of the possible outcomes of their choices. In 1998, Eggers wrote an essay that was published in Esquire Magazine. Continuing to fight the idea of smoking and it’s after-effects, Eggers uses personal experience, interviews, and research into tobacco companies to depict the one idea in regards to a smoker’s death that has gone unanswered for far too long: “Ultimately, who’s to blame?”…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Joe Chemo

    • 2090 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 45.3 million people in the United States to be cigarette smokers. Such an astounding number is certainly an accomplishment for cigarette companies and their investors. But after learning cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S.; the number only seems grotesque and disheartening. However, in recent years, there has been a national push for anti-smoking campaigns. More specifically, anti-smoking advocates have made a tremendous effort to raise awareness in children and adolescents in an attempt to decrease the nation’s startling smoking statistics for the near future. A tactful attempt to raise awareness about the dangers of smoking cigarettes has come from the use of satirical advertisements. An example of such an advertisement was found on the website adbusters.org. The image invokes a reaction from viewers while discrediting the Camel brand with the use of the same rhetorical strategies used to initially capture a massive market for Marlboro cigarettes in an original advertisement. The spoof advertisement is able to discredit such a renowned company by carrying the bulk of its argument in the use of logos opposed to relying solely on an emotional appeal.…

    • 2090 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thank You of Smoking

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film Thank You for Smoking is a dark comedy that follows a lobbyist, Nick Naylor, for the tobacco industry. Dark comedies take a serious topic, and make light of the topic through satire. A good example of rhetoric can be found inThank You for Smoking during a scene where Nick Naylor delivers an argument against putting a skull and crossbones label on every pack of cigarettes. This is done during a hearing in front of a congressional committee lead by Senator Finistirre from Vermont. Naylor’s audience is the committee and members of the audience including his young son. Naylor is defending a controversial idea with controversial evidence and support, whether it goes against what he believes or not. Naylor’s own morality gets called into question. Logos, pathos, kairos, and ethos, the pillars of rhetoric, can all be found throughout Naylor’s defense. Rhetorical fallacies can also be found throughout the sequence.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the interviews one candidate stated that “Everyone makes a smoker feel guilty. I know I felt terribly guilty. When I smoked, I felt like I had the plague. You know, like I’m an unclean, unfit person because I smoked, and that’s a terrible feeling. Do you know what that does to you, really? That makes you feel like hell” (Poland). Many statements such as these were recorded throughout the interview, showing just how bad it has been portrayed to be a smoker. The stereotypical smoker portrayed in the educational programs geared against tobacco as homeless, unemployed, unskilled manual workers, and welfare recipients (Poland). This is a far cry from the formerly prominent smoker imaging, the “fat cat on Wall street,” or the cool teenagers who smoke while racing cars (Kleiser), or even cartoon characters who smoked big cigars (Craig). While these demographics were still very much smoking, it was the blue collar, working class people who were punished the most in social settings, as the stigma had grown to…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reynolds are finding new ways to market their products since they aren’t allowed to on television or in magazines. They are using “nontraditional” advertising by paying retailers to place their products in the most visible parts of the store (Brodwin). Brodwin also identifies R.J. Reynolds using flavors like orange-mint, chocolate, and vanilla in its Camel cigarettes to increase their appeal to youth and first-time smokers. Likewise, the tobacco industries also sponsor sports teams, concerts, and public arenas. Consequently, companies like ‘The Real Cost’ have exceeded the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendation for achieving popular awareness levels (Duke et al.). According to Hayden, tobacco-control efforts have averted 8 million premature deaths in the United States. A study led by David Levy of Georgetown University in Washington, DC compared the difference between the life expectancy in 1964 to today; the study showed those whose lives were saved by tobacco-control efforts gained an average of 20 years of life (Hayden). “Cigarette smoking costs about $170 billion a year in U.S health care expenses” and two-thirds of those expenses are paid through Medicare or Medicaid (Preidt). Tobacco use is taking the money of taxpayers whether they smoke or not. Luckily tobacco control efforts are also being federally funded. The Tips campaign is one of the most cost-effective of all health interventions; this campaign cost $48 million and was the first federally funded national mass media anti-smoking campaign and led to 100,000 smokers quitting permanently (Preidt). Although tobacco companies are still able to make revenue the anti-tobacco efforts have proven to be effective and make a difference in the United States while saving federal…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie, “Thank You for Smoking” is a comedy with a tobacco industry lobbyist, Nick Naylor as the lead. The movie has an eerie comic theme which tackles the serious issue of the addicting substance of tobacco, or to be more specific, nicotine. The idea which the movie was trying to portray was that this lobbyist was a great speaker who is able to manipulate many a feeble-mind. A lobbyist, to begin with, is one who is employed to persuade all-concerned of the employer’s concern(s), in this case, the marketing of tobacco products.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays