Preview

Small Claims Courts in the Philippines

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1319 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Small Claims Courts in the Philippines
Small Claims Courts in the Philippines
Going to court for a small sum of money has just become cheaper and faster with the establishment of small claims courts. A simple procedure makes it easy for everyone.
According to former Court Administrator, now Supreme Court Associate Justice Jose P. Perez, 70% of cases before Metropolitan Trial Courts in Metro Manila are small claims (involving small amounts of money) and many of the litigants in these cases are poor. The same thing is true, if not more prevalent, in the provinces and rural areas of the Philippines.
To easily dispose of small claims, the Philippine Supreme Court promulgated the Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases , which will govern the litigation of claims for sums of money not exceeding 100,000 pesos (P100,000.00) and designated certain courts to handle such cases.
Cases Covered by Small Claims Courts
All claims for payments or reimbursements for a sum of money not exceeding P100,000.00 are now considered small claims and, therefore, may only be filed before Small Claims Courts (SCCs). The claim may arise from a variety of sources: unpaid loan, purchase price of a product or service, value of a stolen or damaged property, amount claimed as damages, etc. The amount limit does not include interests and costs. Thus, an indebtedness of P100,000.00 that earned an interest of P1,000.00 when due and incurred P200.00 as cost of collection - bringing a total of P101,200.00 - will still be within the jurisdiction of SCCs.
The rule did not create new courts but merely designated Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts (known as first-level courts because they are at the first and lowest level in a hierarchy of courts with increasing jurisdiction and powers and in the appeals process). Upon the effectivity of the rule on October 1, 2008, only 22 first-level courts were designated to act as SCCs throughout the country, but now all



References: Rule of Procedure on Small Claims Cases (A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC); Rules of Civil Procedure (Rules of Court); Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Court of Chancery is not given the jurisdiction to award penalties on government cost recovery cases as it is of limited jurisdiction. Therefore its laws are not mandatory as it can be honored by The Supreme Court who will make the decision. Therefore any cost recovery action is not available at equity. Similarly, private cost recovery actions should be addressed at the Superior Court.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Single recovery principle: requires a court to settle the matter once and for all, by awarding a lump sum for past and future expenses…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Should a case be denied a court hearing because there is not enough in monetary…

    • 461 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I. Superior courts now have trial jurisdiction over all civil cases including family law, probate, juvenile, and general civil matters. For monetary issues under $10,000 a person in pro-per living in Los Angeles could file a complaint in small claims court. All filings over $10,000 would have to be made in Los Angeles County Superior Court Civil Division. If we were to receive an unfavorable ruling above in a court other than…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are two major lawsuits which the main populace has defined as frivolous. One of those cases is the McDonald’s split coffee case. This is the case where the plaintiff spilled her coffee and was rumored to sue McDonald’s for 2.7 million dollars and win. The other’s case is the Pearson dry cleaning case where a man sued Chung Dry Cleaner’s 54 million dollars for losing his pants. The plaintiff won in the McDonald’s Case and the Plaintiff lost in the Dry clearance’s case. In this paper we are going to dissect each case by the facts, the law, the issues, the ethical issues, the defendants preventative measures, and then the analysis of it all.…

    • 3450 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Observation Paper

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The court case I observed was the 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law, Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The purpose of this court case was to determine whether or not it should be taken into a motion of summary judgement. The plaintiff in the case was Deborah White. White was represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants in this case are Patrick Gibbs; and O’Malley’s Tavern. The representatives of the defendants were Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. Before summarizing the arguments of the plaintiff and the defendant, there will be a short summarization of the incident.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    court report

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a) The plaintiff, MavCap, filed the case against Mobifusion, Inc. In exchange for a securing three million dollar investment from MavCap; in 2010, Mobifusion agreed in the Note Purchase Agreement that MavCap could have a seat on the board of directors of Mobifuson and that the MavCap, through the Board, would be allowed to approve any expenditures of its investment over RM 100,000 (about $32,790). However, in Sep 2012, Mobifusion decided to end run its contractual obligations and cut MavCap out of the approval process by making daily funs transfer just RM 1,000 (about $299.32) under the threshold for which MavCap’s approval was required, but in combination such daily transfer greatly excced the RM 100,000 approval threshold.…

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    project management course

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    CLAIM COSTED AGAINST THE CLIENTS NAME AND I RECOMMEND THAT WE SETTLE CASH ON MY ESTIMATE PM COSTING…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ii. Amount in controversy – good faith allegation the claim in the complaint exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The State level courts follow a similar structure with Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (city, county, municipal, district, or magistrate courts) which hear cases usually at a…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal system

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Can the small claims court impose equitable relief (non monetary relief such as an injunction or specific performance)?…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    French Court System

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    single court at the top and various courts at the base. Litigants displeased with a court decision…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andres Lao vs. CA

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: In 1965 a Contract of Sales Agent was entered by the Association of Anglo-American Tobacco Corporation with Andres Lao. Lao was to sell cigarettes manufactured and shipped by the Corporation to his address in Tacloban, and he would remit the sales proceeds. Lao would receive commission for those sold, with a monthly salary and operational allowance. In 1968 Lao’s attention was called to his enormous accounts and the difficulty in obtaining a tally despite his avowal of regular remittance of collections. In 1969 it was established that his liability amounted to P525,053. Also, the Corp. discovered that Lao was engaged in a construction business and suspecting that he diverted the sale proceeds to such business, it gave a demand letter for payment of his obligations. It also found that contrary to his allegations, he did not have a huge collectible from customers and nothing was due to the Corporation. From then on, the Corp. no longer sent him shipments. In 1970, Andres, Jose and Tomas Lao brought a complaint for accounting and damages against the Corp.. The court ordered both to undergo a court supervised accounting but also ordered the Corporation to pay the Lao’s actual loss of earnings, moral damages, exemplary damages, atty. fees and cost of suit. Later the court gave a supplemental decision dismissing Lao’s claim of overpayment. The Corp. and the Lao’s appealed. The CA found the Corp. liable for actual damages of loss of earnings, moral damages and exemplary damages. It also ordered the Corp. to pay the claim of overpayment by Lao. The Corp. file a motion for reconsideration and during its pendency, Esteban Co, the new VP of the Corp. filed a complaint with the fiscal alleging Lao failed to remit an amount which he allegedly misappropriated and converted to his own…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ARTICLE 1823

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case at bar the respondent Tropical had every reason to believe that a partnership existed between the petitioner and Galan and no fault or error can be imputed against it for making payments to "Galan and Associates" and delivering the same to Galan because as far as it was concerned, Galan was a true partner with real authority to transact on behalf of the partnership with which it was dealing. This is even more true in the cases of Cebu Southern Hardware and Blue Diamond Glass Palace who supplied materials on credit to the partnership. Thus, it is but fair that the consequences of any wrongful act committed by any of the partners therein should be answered solidarily by all the partners and the partnership as a whole…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays