Should The Government Monitoring The Internet Equals Violation?

"Monitoring the Internet Equals Violation There is controversy over to what extent the government may monitor internet content. The federal government may not monitor internet content however, the state government and local governments may monitor internet content only for the safety of the user. However, charging citizens for internet crimes are usually ruled unconstitutional. In addition, monitoring internet content violates Amendment IV and previous precedents. Ultimately, the state government has the responsibility to monitor internet content only when there is a clear and present danger to citizens. The duty to monitoring internet content is up to the state and local governments. The federal government may not interfere with monitoring internet content because the constitution does not delegate the power of regulating internet content to the federal government. In addition, Amendment X states if the Constitution does not explicitly give the federal government the powers, then the Constitution reserves those powers
The state government has the obligation to protect people from certain internet content however, the Supreme Courts find the charges of internet crime unconstitutional. In addition, monitoring internet content violates Amendment IV and the right to privacy. Overall, the government attempts to regulate and monitor internet content to protect citizens from cyberbullying, pornography and other types of internet crime. Mainly, the government is attempting to diminish cyberbullying and various unmoral acts that are corrupting society. The government and society must find various solutions to this dilemma to boost the economy morally and physically. However, the courts rule the government’s attempts as violations of amendments and various precedents. Ultimately, the Bill of rights and precedents protect citizens’ privacy of internet