Should Textbooks Be Replaced By Notebook Computers?
“Should Textbooks Be Replaced By Notebook Computers?”
Its believable 100% that the scientific worldview dominates our contemporary consciousness. And thus do kids really need to go to school to learn by textbooks?. For most ancient people it is blindingly obvious that textbooks is the only place where teaching relies upon. And for them it goes without saying that real learning only takes place where there is teaching with the aid of textbooks. Kids need notebook computers for real learning to take place, and they need them for six or eight hours a day, five days a week and at least eleven months a year. In fact, they need them in there entire life or if not they end up sinking in a sea of ignorance.
In this world of modern lead generation, …show more content…
There are various reasons why textbooks should be replaced by today’s latest technology. Hence, it's high time for the whole world to embrace the 21st century of technology, by saying goodbye to the frustrating conditions of Student textbooks which must be replaced by notebook computers because of the following views.
One of the reasons is that textbooks lead to back pains and shoulder problems. “Kids who wear their backpacks full of textbooks over their shoulders, as many do, since it looks better or just feels easier- may end up leaning to one side to offset the extra weight. They might develop lower and upper back pain and strain their shoulders and neck”. “Doctors say they are observing a growing number of children suffering serious back pain as the result of carrying around overloaded backpacks because children’s spines are still growing. Thus, the heavy packs and tilted gait they carry could result into long term back problems” “According to data from the United States Product Safety Commission, over the period from 1994-2000 more than 23,000 youths ages 6 to 18 were treated for backpack related injuries, such as contusions, sprains, and strains to the back and shoulders, and fractures” (Procon.org). Children are suffering as a result of heavy back packs full of textbooks and many believe that this is a problem that can be totally changed by the introduction of net book computers …show more content…
“Over fifty million trees are chopped down each year to make textbooks in the United States alone. Four billion trees worldwide are chopped down yearly for paper, notebooks, workbooks, you name it” (Dublin.patch.com). An example is that “Indonesia extinguished half of its rain forests in these few decades” (essay-forum.com). That is a lot of trees resulting in less and less oxygen yearly. If we do not stop this problem, a long time from now, we will not have any oxygen left. “Using similar data, an outfit called "Clean tech" did a study which looked at the question sort if in reverse, saying if you were to read three books a month for four years, the e-reader would significantly outperform conventional paper books in carbon emitted” (scgh.com). Notebook computers do not require trees as the textbooks requires many trees. It is a major issue of how any trees we chop down a
Its believable 100% that the scientific worldview dominates our contemporary consciousness. And thus do kids really need to go to school to learn by textbooks?. For most ancient people it is blindingly obvious that textbooks is the only place where teaching relies upon. And for them it goes without saying that real learning only takes place where there is teaching with the aid of textbooks. Kids need notebook computers for real learning to take place, and they need them for six or eight hours a day, five days a week and at least eleven months a year. In fact, they need them in there entire life or if not they end up sinking in a sea of ignorance.
In this world of modern lead generation, …show more content…
There are various reasons why textbooks should be replaced by today’s latest technology. Hence, it's high time for the whole world to embrace the 21st century of technology, by saying goodbye to the frustrating conditions of Student textbooks which must be replaced by notebook computers because of the following views.
One of the reasons is that textbooks lead to back pains and shoulder problems. “Kids who wear their backpacks full of textbooks over their shoulders, as many do, since it looks better or just feels easier- may end up leaning to one side to offset the extra weight. They might develop lower and upper back pain and strain their shoulders and neck”. “Doctors say they are observing a growing number of children suffering serious back pain as the result of carrying around overloaded backpacks because children’s spines are still growing. Thus, the heavy packs and tilted gait they carry could result into long term back problems” “According to data from the United States Product Safety Commission, over the period from 1994-2000 more than 23,000 youths ages 6 to 18 were treated for backpack related injuries, such as contusions, sprains, and strains to the back and shoulders, and fractures” (Procon.org). Children are suffering as a result of heavy back packs full of textbooks and many believe that this is a problem that can be totally changed by the introduction of net book computers …show more content…
“Over fifty million trees are chopped down each year to make textbooks in the United States alone. Four billion trees worldwide are chopped down yearly for paper, notebooks, workbooks, you name it” (Dublin.patch.com). An example is that “Indonesia extinguished half of its rain forests in these few decades” (essay-forum.com). That is a lot of trees resulting in less and less oxygen yearly. If we do not stop this problem, a long time from now, we will not have any oxygen left. “Using similar data, an outfit called "Clean tech" did a study which looked at the question sort if in reverse, saying if you were to read three books a month for four years, the e-reader would significantly outperform conventional paper books in carbon emitted” (scgh.com). Notebook computers do not require trees as the textbooks requires many trees. It is a major issue of how any trees we chop down a