Preview

Should Charlie Gordon's Doctors Act Ethically?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
370 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Charlie Gordon's Doctors Act Ethically?
Curotto Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man who wishes one day he would be smart. Charlie Gordon is mentally disabled. When Charlie took the IQ test he scored 68. Charlie Gordon's doctors are Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss. Dr. Nemur is a psychiatrist , and Dr. Strauss is a neurosurgeon. Charlie is in contact with these doctors because they gave him the surgery to make him smarter. Ethics refer to well-founded standards of right and wrong to prescribe what humans are known to do. Despite Charlie getting to experience genius like ability, some critics believe his doctors did not act ethically. Even considering the critics claims, Charlie Gordon's doctors acted ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smart.
The surgery showed the doctors that the surgery can be used on humans, but it has never been done before on humans. There were some side effects to Charlie's surgery. Therefore Charlie's doctors had to act ethically. The side effects were that Charlie would be smart for a little while, and act like a normal human being, but later in life Charlie would go back to being himself again. As
…show more content…
The doctors had to make a big decision, if they did not give Charlie the surgery then he would probably never be smart. On the other hand if they did give him the surgery then he would be smart, but then eventually he would turn back to dumb. The surgery that the doctors gave Charlie should be given to other people around the world. The question people should ask them self's is "do I want to smart for a little bit, or never be smart at all." That’s the question Charlie had to ask himself. Even Charlie said “I don’t know what’s worse to not know what you are and be happy, or to become what you’ve always wanted to be, and feel alone.” He means that no matter what he did to himself people would never like

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why I believe That charlie should have had the operation is that while he was a genius he discovered thing about what was happening to him and he called it the “Algernon-Gordon Effect” (keyes, 80). He also found out how the artificial intelligence works and how it wears off…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the operation, Charlie began to go through a regression. Before the operation he was smarter than he is now that he regrets. “I did a dumb thing today I for got I wasnt in Miss Kinnians class at the adult centen any more like I use to be”(Keyes 243). His regression was so awful that his I.Q decrees to 68. So it was an awful idea…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man with an IQ of around 68. For his whole life, he has only wanted to be "smart" like everyone else. Charlie has two doctors named Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur. The doctor's want to use Charlie as a test subject to test out a surgery to increase the Human IQ. Ethics are if you really did the "right" thing, so Charlie's doctor's did not act ethically when performing the surgery on Charlie. They had not kept their choices opinion free, they had not put Charlie's social life over science, and they didn't inform Charlie of the potential risks and side effects of the surgery.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlie Gordon showed us that surgerys are very risky and we should really think before we do risky things. In the science fiction story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keys, Charlie has a passion to get intelligent but in my perspective the surgery was useless and risky. Charlie Gordon should not have had the Artificial Intelligence surgery because i was risky and it wasn't permanent.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon Argument

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlie Gordon was a determined man. He wanted to learn as much as he could but he was unable to because he was mentally retarded. Meanwhile, his doctors were testing an operation which they wanted to perform on Charlie to make him more intelligent however, he would eventually lose his intelligence and knowledge leading to his death. He would be unable to connect with other people because he would be too smart. Despite these affects, people still believe that the operation preformed on Charlie was ethical. Charlie Gordon's doctors didn't act ethically when they preformed the surgery on Charlie Gordon to make him smarter.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie’s actions are important because they reveal how we can make irrational decisions without knowing the dangers. Charlie was definitely being brave in choosing to do his surgery, for an act to be courageous, it must involve extreme risk or danger, but it should not be for a personal gain, it should be moral. Charlie agreed to do the surgery, but only because it was going to help him become intelligent. Sure, it would’ve helped his doctors improve the procedure for future trials. But, that doesn’t mean they are helping save someone’s life, they are only improving it temporarily. Earlier in the Flowers for Algernon movie, Charlie reveals how foolish and not courageous his actions were when he tried to use the mixer (in the factory he worked at), without proper training. For an act to be courageous, it must not be irrational. The equipment was dangerous, and Charlie could’ve gotten hurt. Later in the Flowers for Algernon movie, Charlie revealed how selfish he was when he stood up against Dr. Strauss in Chicago. It’s understandable that Charlie was standing up for himself, but he embarrassed Dr. Strauss even after all he had done for him. Charlie was acting like the sun, wanting planets (or everyone and everything) to revolve around…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctors lead Charlie blindly, but willingly, into the surgery, using him for research. Charlie knew not what his new found knowledge would bring him; despair, doubt, dread. He knew of the doctor’s ignorance to his feelings and human status, and of the surgery ultimately failing. Due to the devastating events that would transpire, Charlie should have refrained from undergoing the…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, The doctors shouldn’t have chosen Charlie Gordon because they resisted in obeying the Ethics of Fieldwork in the Belmont Report. According to the Belmont Report,” the requirement to acknowledge autonomy and the requirement to protect those with diminished autonomy.” A person with an IQ of 68 has extremely diminished autonomy or intelligence. In the report it says to “Protect those with diminished autonomy.” Charlie was not protected from the harm the world has…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlie was all in for the surgery no matter what because all he wanted was to be smarter than he was. Although all he got was to experience about a few weeks of being smart. It made him want to work harder and make himself smart again after the intelligence wore off. He could have lived his life if he didn't have the surgery, but now there is that possibility that he will pass before he was able to do the things he was wanting to do. Therefore the surgery was unnecessary and Charlie shouldn't of had to go through that…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to CBS news, 15% of people are mentally handicapped, but what if I said that there was an operation to make a person three times as smart and make one normal. In the fictional story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes, It is about a mentally handicapped man named Charlie Gordon that gets an operation that is supposed to make him smarter and get rid of his disability. The operation is tested on a mouse and it gets smarter, so they perform it on Charlie and it makes him smarter for a short period of time. Eventually the mouse loses the intelligence and dies. Obviously, there are more costs as a consequence of Algernon-Gordon experiment.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlie in the story wanted to be smart to have more friends and make people like him, what we the readers can assume as fitting in. Though Charlie probably didn’t know what fitting in meant before his surgery, it shows us how he was desperate to be smart even though it might hurt him tremendously, or even just be temporary. This example shows us that he was putting a mask, and obscuring himself and being somebody completely different, not even realizing what the end result might be. Keys wants to explain how the people in the world want to change themselves completely just to fit in and get liked by others, an example would be people trying tattoos and being punk to be like the people around them when they, from the inside, dislike tattoos and being…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does Charlie really deserve to die? Charlie just wanted to become smart and live longer; but the Doctors didn’t tell Charlie that the intelligence would be temporary. In the story, Flowers for Algernon, I strongly feel that the Doctors did not follow their ethics of fieldwork and made a bad choice by choosing Charlie Gordon as their test subject for the intelligence surgery. If Charlie didn’t take the surgery, he could have lived longer with an IQ of 68, but instead dies.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the nurse pushes Charlie in the squeaky bed into the operating room, unaware the horrible things will come of the surgery. In the story “Flowers for Algernon”, a science fiction story by Daniel Keyes, Charlie Gordon, a 37 year old man, with a mental disability, wanted to be smart all his life. Then one day Charlie was given the chance to have a surgery that would triple his I.Q, after the operation he undergoes many changes. Charlie’s character drastically changes after the operation. Charlie should’ve never had the surgery because he became negative as a person, he regressed and lost everything he learned, and he’s experience psychological and emotional changes.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the novel beginnings Charlie write progress note in a rudimentary format with misspellings and grammar conflicts yet show his desires to "get smart". This Charlie is dull but still provides insight by reciting however various people act such Alice being nervous before his operation or why he was even chosen for the operation. After the operation intelligence is slow to come to Charlie, we learn that he was abused emotionally as a child and it continued to his elder years. The progress notes emit their true value here as provide basis for examining the change and development of his intelligence. Charlie emotional descent comes soon after his intelligence raises rapidly, this especially evident in his distrust of Burt, a psychological doctor, who has treated Charlie well to this point. Charlie discloses to us that he feels he needs to hide his personal entries and while he cannot understand this need the reader can use judgment. His emotional comes when states his intelligence has changed the way he…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    xplain the quotation and how it relates to the reason you think Charlie was or was not right to have the operation. (This is…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics