Should Apple Use Iphone Data?

Many debates between the company Apple and the Federal Bureau of Investigation about whether or not Apple should unlock the phone of Syed Farook, one of the San Bernardino attackers. Many say disrupting their privacy violates the fourth amendment, “No unlawful searches or seizures against any man, without a probable cause.” I highly believe this allows Apple to help the FBI to unlock the phone of the attackers. In the article, “PRO/CON: Should Apple have resisted FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?” By the Associated Press, the author disputes the reasons why Apple should unlock the of the San Bernardino attackers. In the article, “Should Apple help the FBI access iPhone data?” by Brian Mastroianni, the author discusses the ideas the FBI had to convince Apple to not make the wrong decision.
According to the Associated Press, the American Government acted quicker during past similar events. Immediately after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Government shut down factories to build wartime facilities. The author writes, “Their mission: to
Apple is worrying more about privacy than the real issue. The FBI says, “...this is less an issue of securing private data on a phone and more of ensuring that all of the crucial intelligence in this particular case is collected.” The author is saying, Apple does not understand what they are fighting against. They obviously believe disrupting Syed Farook’s privacy is the main issue. HE’S A TERRORIST! Does Apple not see the man has helped the Islamic State extremist group kill 14 innocent citizens and yet believe his privacy matters. The terrorist’ dead for god's sake. Yes, we all understand this is a violation of the fourth amendment, but guess what Apple, the FBI has a warrant which allows Apple to unlock the phone with no charges against them. It’s a quite a big issue when the FBI has a warrant and are still unable to access the data in the