Preview

Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Animal Testing Be Banned?
Abstract

This investigation was outlined and evaluated the research question of should animal experimentation be banned in varies sites. For the past five decades, there has been a widespread argument for the use of animals in medical science and product testing which is controversial. By looked through medical perception, it undeniable sometimes animals testing have made a valuable contribution to human health. However, looked at another site, animal tests in turn creates serious damage which are dangerously misleading information toward human health, increases ricks endangering and contribute to the making new diseases and even death towards animals. In order to successfully complete this research, a total of 32 university students completed
…show more content…
Moreover, animal experimentation such a waste of resources, scarified money and time and also unethical action which have been violated animals’ rights.

2.1Findings from animal testing are unreliable Indeed, there are many modern medical advances such as antibiotics and vaccine exposed to animals have came out with different results, reaction and treatments as humans. This is because of animals have vastly different genetic backgrounds and physiological properties compared to humans. For instance, penicillin was an antibiotic which was discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1929 (Safer Medicines, 2016). It has shown that Guinea Pigs were killed after using Penicillin, but for humans, it is still known as a useful antibiotic which is commonly used to treat any kind of infections which is caused by bacteria, to save human lives (Animal Research, 2016). Another real life case is the use of the drug thalidomide. Based on a research report of The Physician Committee (2016), it is proven that it has inversely effects on pregnant animals and pregnant mother. Thalidomide drug which were consumed by pregnant mothers during pregnancy caused harm or death to more than 10,000 babies in the year of 1960. However, in fact thalidomide has
…show more content…
They have right to be treated with respect, animals are deserved to live their lives free from suffering and carrying on pains, physical harms. According to Sri Aurobindo (2010), he stated that life is life no matter in a cat, or dog or man. There is no difference there between a cat and a man. The idea of difference is a human conception for man's own advantage. So far in comparison of the biggest difference between humans and animals is just humans have abilities such as they are able drive, speak and write. On certain view, humans are exactly same as animals due to some people are lack of those abilities which makes they become similar as animals. Therefore, animals have equal right as humans, have inherent value and animals exist for their own reasons not for useful to humans. There were more than millions live frogs were used for dissection. Through this action, it have been deprived animals’ right to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though animal testing should be banned from ever being practiced or used again, people still view it as a necessity despite all of the evidence against it. Animal testing requires inhumane, unsanitary, unsafe, or cruel conditions that if done to humans would be outlawed since they either reduce the quality of life or cause disease or death. Seeing that animals are living, breathing creatures that want to survive just as much as people do, assuming that test conditions are not good for human kind, then they are not good for any living creatures. Furthermore, they are inherently wrong by nature. Tolerating animal cruelty promotes the same insensitivity that allows cruelty to people, such as serial killers and the early incidents of animal torture.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am a seventh grade student at the amazing Warren Jr. High. One of the first reasons why we shouldn’t have animal testing is because animals are getting hurt or abused. Another reason why we shouldn’t have animal testing is drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe on humans. The main idea of the essay is animal testing should be banned.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation saves lives and makes vaccines for diseases. But, millions of animals die for experimentation and it doesn’t work every time, even people die because of false information. Animals are important in their habitats and kingdoms. If people take them, then they can't do their jobs. Animal experimentation is not needed for us because of how many animals die for it and how many false procedures there are that also kill people.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should NOT be used for testing in labs. There are many reasons why this dilemma should stop. They have different bodies than humans so the tests may react different on them than on humans and that could lead to danger to people. I think if scientists have to lab test on something living then they should pick something overpopulated, but that still is not okay, therefore something needs to be figured out. Or instead of using helpless animals, they should use all natural products and take human volunteers willing to get tested on. Why risk poor helpless little animal’s lives? Why torture them? It is proven that animals are not the best test subjects to use.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The crux of the issue of animal experimentation is whether or not we think it is absolutely necessary and moral to experiment on animals in the hope for benefits to…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever wondered about the pain and suffering that animals go through for our selfish needs? The topic of animal testing has been debated (raged) since the seventeenth century (1600), but in the recent years this topic has been under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups. Although animal testing has been beneficial, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals are being treated terribly for experiments that may have no point in the end. Is that what you would want to hear know your life could still be in danger?…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should scientists examine their harmful substances on animals? Approximately two to five million animals have been used under testing (''Animal Aid,'' n.d). Animal testing has increased worldwide, scientists believe that animals are the best sacrifice for these specific type of tests which include a wide range of chemicals, which include vaccines and drugs because they believe that animals are the only species that proper things to be examined on and usually will not feel anything even if they got sick after being testing on, and which will lead to poisoning animals and eventually harming them. Excess killing of animals can cause extinction of its own kind. People around the world find that animal testing is much better and safer, in contrast a major amount of people are not happy with what is happening to the pets if the experiments are not safe and the creatures are getting hurt.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Animal Testing Essay

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the past five decades, public support for animal testing has declined tremendously. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs. In my opinion, I do not support animal testing because there are better ways to conduct experiments, rather than using animals. Generally, there are the pros and cons of animal testing. However we can maintain animal rights. In my presentation, I will discuss them with supporting reasons include explanations and examples.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is used as a method to assess the safety and effectiveness of many products and chemicals (Bishop). Many people deem this acceptable and don’t think twice about the countless animals being tortured. It can be argued that animal experimentation can be valuable and have helped find cures for many diseases. However, the numbers of successes are minimal. Testing on animals is brutal and unnecessary, and should be prohibited in all countries.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has its pros and cons but ultimately is unnecessary now. It seems that the only reason it still exists in such popularity is the immoral influence of large corporations. Experiment methods such as selective formulation, human cultures, the physiological chip, cellular tests, and microdosing have made animal testing, a once necessary evil, obsolete. For this, it seems experimenting on animals should at least be limited. Maybe one day it will be completely…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing uses thousands to millions of dollars of taxpayer’s money but, in many cases it has been proven that animal experimentation has little or no scientific relevance. Each year, animals are being tested to show the effectiveness and safety of products, such as cosmetics, but how about if it’s not effective at all. How about it is a waste of time and money? Thousands of animals are experimented on that don’t grant assurance for humans. Animal testing should be banned in the U.S. because the genetic differences between humans and animals are tremendously wide.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most animal tests do not work and are not effective. Sure, people might argue that animal testing has advanced our medicine and saved countless lives. Well, that is true but, most things we are experimenting today, since we have came very far in the medicine department, can not be effectively tested on animals. Humans and animals are not much alike as well. Animals have different metabolic structures, and anatomy. Also, almost all drugs are re-tested on human subjects. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) states that 95% of drugs that were successfully tested on animals but failed in human tests because they were dangerous. The same thing happened with cancer medicine, 93% of tests failed on human trials but not on animal trials. Most medical advances for human health are not even based on animal trials. Just like Paul Furlong, professor of clinical neuroimaging, said “We’re not 70 kg…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every year more than 25 million animals are used to develop new medicines and the majority of these animals are either euthanized or die from the experiments. This makes many people question our motives and moral principles. Should we continue to allow scientists to use animals for their research? Is research experiments really necessary? Is it alright for us to kill animals just so that we can benefit? The debate between supporting or opposing animal experimentation is difficult due to the success and failure we receive. But we can not deny the fact that animal experimentation is a very important factor that helps us advance in medical researches and technologies. They help us…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Firstly, the way animals and humans react towards a drug can be drastically different and therefore what applies to an animal might not apply to the human situation. Kara Rogers, in her report, describes the reliability of animal testing results. She says that the chemical properties of a drug are the main factors that determine the effect of a drug in a body. Animal experiments might give an indication whether a drug is likely to be effective but its applicability is determined by the outcomes revealed by clinical trials done on humans. Kara says that sometimes the effect of a drug on animals and humans is different due to the physiological and genetic differences. There are examples of drugs that were proven to be toxic to humans but such toxicity was not evident when it was given to animals. Kara advocates the use of alternative methods such as in vitro tests to test for drugs because not all are applicable to both animals and humans simultaneously. There are many examples of drugs that have completely different effects on humans and animals. For instance, monoclinical antibodies that are used to treat immune system diseases and neurotherapeutics that treat nervous system diseases show completely divergent effects when they are used on animals and humans. (Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing) .Secondly, one should not forget the physiological differences between the humans and the animals especially rats. According to information stated at the Christian Medical Fellowship about 2.78 million animals are used annually in research in the UK and that most of the animals used in UK are rats. According to the stated statistics only 84% of the animals are rodents, 12% are fish, amphibians or birds, and the rest are small animals, large mammals and primates (CMF Publications). Moreover, people should become conscious of the fact that conditions in which lab animals are kept can influence and alter…

    • 3324 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation has been a decidedly controversial topic for a long time. Whilst there are arguments for both sides, Animal experimentation should be banned. It’s not vital in the medical world, often times providing inaccurate information; it’s unethical, because it’s done at the expenses of animals; and it often isn’t beneficial because of the various differences between humans and animal test subjects.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays