Should A City Support Cities To Live In A Nation?

Who should thrive in a nation? While some would argue that in modern times cities generate the biggest share of economic activity in a nation. Therefore, the government should support cities more than rural areas in order to promote the well being of a nation. Moreover, some would argue that since the majority of the population live now in cities they would be the best indication of a nation’s soul. However, a nation’s soul should not be said to be uniquely formed or represented in urban or rural setting a nation’s soul should represent a nation as a whole. Major cities, small cities, big towns, or small towns compose a nation as a whole. A city and a rural town depend on each other in order to thrive. For a nation to thrive, allocation of funds should not be based on who is believed by politicians to hold the cultural
Both are part of the rich tapestry of cultural representations in a nation. Both are valid forms of expression of culture. The connection between who lays claim on the cultural tradition of a country and budget concerns for development is preposterous. A nation’s culture as the example expresses culture and traditions that celebrate mores and beliefs held by a nation. If a city needs better public transportation for its citizens the government should support such projects. If a rural area, needs better highways to communicate with cities government official should support such projects as well. While it is true that sometimes, both projects can not be accomplished at the same time. It should be decided on its pros and cons which project should be pursue first. This might not be always 50/50 there is politics involved and interests to take into account, but it should be based on the feasibility of the project, its costs, and the benefits that will bring not arbitrary decision on who holds the nation’s cultural tradition in who gets the