Preview

Second Treatise On Civil Government By Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Second Treatise On Civil Government By Jean-Jacques Rousseau
According to Jean-Jacques Rousseau (b. 1712) there is two types of people in the State of Nature a natural or savage man, and modern man. The savage man is the one who existed before organized society and modern man, or we can think of this as natural existence and civil society. In Rousseau’s writing you can see he believes that a savage man is a happy man, and that he believes we are naturally and innately good and that “civilization” turns man bad. Thomas Hobbes is one philosopher that thought differently than Rousseau, he believed natural man was solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short and that civilization is responsible for “rescuing” mankind and that being a “savage” is considered bad (Dunning). While John Locke is one philosopher that agrees with Rousseau saying in his Second Treatise on Civil Government, “In the state of nature all men are free to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature” (Hibben).
Rousseau believed in Amour De Soi, French for self-love, the concept of the self-love humans share with
…show more content…
This, however, hinders not, but that philosophers may, if they please, extend their reasoning to the suppos'd state of nature; provided they allow it to be a mere philosophical fiction, which never had, and never cou'd have any reality”(Dunning).
Hume also argues that if we were all so friendly and kind to one another Justice would not be important to us, and that it only comes from the selfishness and the generosity of man along with the limited resources nature provides us. Rousseau thought that education and reason was the reason that man was “unnatural” and corrupted, which Voltaire disagreed with emphatically, which was one of many things the two did not see eye-to-eye with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of Rousseau 's ideas that was also talked about in his text was the idea that man was born free. This idea of being free is incorperated within the Declaration itself. “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienble Rights.” (pg. 80). This line from the declaration of independence focuses its idea to that which rousseau considers a “Right,” a word mentioned in the Declaration of independence itself. Rousseau talks about this concept of a “right” of being a sort of natural agreement of authority that all men are born with. Rousseau explains that our rights cannot derive from physcial strength, and cannot derive from our natrual authority over his fellows, he explains that a right is a sort of an authority that is given…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political unions define our lives. They are the basis for the laws that govern our actions and, perhaps, even our thoughts. So long as governments exist, people must work to discover their ideal structure. James Madison, in “Federalist Paper Number 10” and “A Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments,” and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in The Social Contract, each try to determine this structure, and they both assume that stability is vital to an ideally functioning society. Nevertheless, when it comes to the government’s power, Madison and Rousseau have little in common. Madison believes that the government is bound by a “great Barrier” which defends the individual's’ rights and that any government breaching this barrier becomes a tyrant. In stark contrast, Rousseau claims that when people join together…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau and Voltaire have differing views on modernity. Rousseau sees arts and sciences as something that corrupt manner. Our conscience detects the difference between good and evil and we transport ourselves to another universe when we read ancient history. Voltaire on the other hand sees history only as a source of wars and disasters and it is our reasoning that frees us from wrong doing. Also, the discovery of the ability to think for ourselves comes very…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the opening of the “Declaration of Independence,” Jefferson lays out several main themes that reflect Rousseau's concepts. Jefferson borrows from Rousseau's thinking on equality and freedom when writing, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights…" (Jefferson 80). Rousseau speaks of equality by disproving the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and Hugo Grotius. These men support the concept that "human race... [refers only to a small, select class of people - the ruling class] (Rousseau 60). Rousseau thinks that the philosophies of these men lack justification and that "All men are born free, and everywhere he is in chains" (Rousseau 59). All men are equal only until they give up their freedom and equality in exchange for comforts and protection in their lives. In other words, Rousseau says man is born free, but because of society man become less and less free. The government, and its laws bind the people down, but the people gain benefits from the government.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He also thinks citizens should have the right to revolt and government should always give and protect our rights. However, the Enlightenment thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau, feels we protect our own rights by working together. In class we discussed how his belief is similar to the phrase: If we all have superpowers the no one has superpowers. We considered this phrase because if everyone were to have superpowers, then we wouldn't wish to have them anymore since everyone has them. Rousseau also stated we must use reason to give the individual rights of life, liberty, and property. Locke shows his views on liberty by inferring one should have the ability to choose who governs them, as well as having their freedom of religion protected. Rousseau expresses his conception toward liberty by explaining whatever the majority of the people want should become law and rules should be strictly enforced if the people are in…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Second Treatise of Government, Locke asserts that humans are born with a natural right to life, liberty and property. He further explains that these individuals are bound morally to respect the rights of every member of that society. Yet he acknowledges advances in society, which impair such state to exist. Locke believes that not all members of the state of nature will respect those rights and further emphasizes the need to create a social contract, which protects these rights. For the only reason a state, or government is established is to protect themselves from anyone who chooses to act immorally consequently preventing them from preserving their natural rights.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government, a central theme Locke decides to pursue in the first chapter is his definition of political power. This definition is necessary for that it sets the precedence in what the call for a government is and how it differs from other social structures. Locke states the power of a government official over a subject can be differentiated from that of a father over his children, a master over his servant, a husband over his wife, and a lord over his slave. Locke asserts that unlike the personal power one imposes over an individual the power of the government is that of a different nature. Locke goes further in providing a definition in stating political power to be a right to make laws with the death penalty and consequently all subordinate penalties for regulating and preserving property, and to employ the force of the community in enforcing such laws and defending the commonwealth from external attack; all this being only for the public good. Locke seems to desire to show the differences in the relationship of a type of private power within man and how he handles his…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of the economic and political texts are written with the main agenda of finding solutions that could boost the welfare of man. This also gives an account of how economic and related social issues and structures play an integral role in shaping the politics of a people. This fuels regime change, a change in the economic policy which is later used by the ruling class to mobilize political support. Some of the authors that have contributed greatly to the discourse of political, social, economic, and religious wellbeing of the people include Locke, Equiano, Shelley, Darwin, Marx, and Freud.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anth 100 Essay 1

    • 2092 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our society’s progression originates from the ideologies, principles, and dogmas passed down through a succession of different philosophical thinkers. We will focus our attention upon the post-Columbian European and American thinkers who have implemented their beliefs to assess the origins of human nature. This essay will provide a greater understanding between Michel de Montaigne, Rousseau Jean-Jacques and Thomas Hobbes with their descriptions of human nature, society’s origin, and the forces that propelled change in human history.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mario Puzo's, Omerta, reflects the theory of Thomas Hobbes In the state of nature, where the theory states, that in the state of nature"…no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."(The Modern Age: Ideas In Western Civilization, Page 37-30) In Peter Cary's, True History of the Kelly Gang, which conveys the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, "Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they. How did this change come about? I do not know. What can make it legitimate? That question I think I can answer…human beings were good in the state of nature and that in civilization there is the basis of corruption." (The Modern Age: Ideas In Western Civilization, Page 35- 38)…

    • 2801 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another doctrine is The Noble Savage, commonly attributed to philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, inspired by the European colonists’ discovery of the indigenous in the New World; it stated the belief that savages were solitary, without ties of love or loyalty and without any industry or art. It also captures the belief that humans in their natural state are selfless, peaceable and untroubled and that negative emotions such as greed and jealousy are products of civilization, a concept which debased Thomas Hobbes’ belief that man is naturally cruel and requires a regular system of police to be resolved. Looking at it from a personal angle, I would say that I quite agree with Hobbes only on one aspect: man is naturally cruel; if he isn’t, then how is it that our history has been tainted with the blood of millions of people who have died because of a single man who could not rein his malice, i.e. Hitler. Even in our everyday life, we manage to…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays