Preview

Scycology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
39763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scycology
H onesty , A ccountAbility And t rust : F ostering r eseArcH i ntegrity in c AnAdA
The Expert Panel on Research Integrity

Science Advice in the Public Interest

HONESTY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRUST: FOSTERING RESEARCH INTEGRITY IN CANADA

The Expert Panel on Research Integrity

THE COUNCIL OF CANADIAN ACADEMIES 180 Elgin Street, Suite 1401, Ottawa, ON Canada K2P 2K3
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was undertaken with the approval of the Board of Governors of the Council of Canadian Academies. Board members are drawn from the RSC: The Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada, the Canadian Academy of Engineering (CAE) and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), as well as from the general public. The members of the Expert Panel responsible for the report were selected by the Council for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report was prepared for the Government of Canada in response to a request from the Minister of Industry. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors, the Expert Panel on Research Integrity, and do not necessarily represent the views of their organizations of affiliation or employment. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Honesty, accountability and trust [electronic resource] : fostering research integrity in Canada/Expert Panel on Research Integrity. Issued also in French under title: Honnêteté, responsabilité et confiance. Includes bibliographical references. Type of computer file: Electronic monograph in PDF format. Issued also in print format. ISBN 978-1-926558-26-4 1. Research—Moral and ethical aspects—Canada. 2. Integrity. I. Council of Canadian Academies. Expert Panel on Research Integrity Q180.55.M67H66 2010a 001.40971 C2010-905698-1

Disclaimer: The internet data and information referenced in this report were correct, to the best of the Council’s knowledge, at the



References: 85 University of Western Ontario (2008) 26 This appendix summarizes the recommendations of the report Review of NSERC’s and SSHRC’s Policy Framework for Research Integrity (NSERC, SSHRC, & AUCC, 2008). Title Integrity in Scientific Research: Principles and procedures Statement of SNF Position on Scientific Misconduct Source Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, 2008 Swiss National Science Foundation, 2005 Natural Environment Research Council, n.d NSF Office of Inspector General, 2009 DHHS Office of Research Integrity, 2009 92

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment2 S251057NUR248

    • 2363 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I declare that all material in this assessment is my own work except where there is a clear acknowledgement and reference to the work of others. I have read the University’s Academic and Scientific Misconduct Policy and understand its implications.*…

    • 2363 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CS159 HW1

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Please review the policies of the course as they relate to academic integrity. The assignment you submit…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In April, 2003 writer Kolesnikov, Jessop (Singapore Sonia) wrote an article titled “Unethical behavior” in the South China Morning Post. In the article it talked about unethical research behavior happening on the other side of the world in Asia. It also shows the importance to have tightened rules and regulations for ethical behavior in medical research.…

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sci 275 Bridger Tetons

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wiley, J. (Year). “Bridger Teton Environmental Science [Video file]. Retrieved from Wiley Plus website: http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/student/main.uni…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ilab Week 3

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard T. Wright and Dorothy Boorse. Environmental Science, 11th Edition.Bookshelf. Web. 22 March 2013 <http://devry.vitalsource.com/books/9781256080008>.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An article was chosen from the University Library to evaluate the issue of unethical business research conduct. The article chose is called Flacking for Big Pharma: Drugmakers Don't Just Compromise Doctors; They Also Undermine the Top Medical Journals and Skew the Findings of Medical Research . The identification of the unethical business research involved in the article is given. The parties involved along with effected party is mentioned. The evaluation of the article also identifies how the unethical behavior affected the organization, injured party, and society. A proposition of how the unethical behavior could be avoided is proposed.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    McKay, A., & Barrett, M. (2010, March 22). Trends in Teen Pregnancy Rates from 1996-2006: A Comparison of Canada, Sweden, U.S.A., and England/Wales. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 19(1-2), 43-52.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Resnik, D., & 0, . (2011, May). What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important?. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, (), . Retrieved from http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/…

    • 817 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Res/351

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Kakuk, P. (2009). The legacy of the Hwang: research misconduct in biosciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4)545-562.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Research in science is an investigation that is bound by rules to establish rational explanation. The information used in scientific research should only be proven reputable information; untrustworthy information will result in faulty research. Research and the information gathered has to be represented with accuracy and without bias. There are three approaches to take to ensure research is sound (Camfield & Palmer-Jones, 2013). The first important manner to take into consideration is if the research derives from a philosophical approach. When asking a question it is imperative to understand the motivation behind comprehension using a rational thought process. The second vital step when conducting research is using methodology. This practice of theoretical analysis insures the design and conduct of the study is committed in such a way that is to be regarded as trustworthy. Last is the researcher’s obligation of ethics. Knowing the difference between right and wrong can be complex at times to rationalize by some. It is important to understand that knowing the difference between right and wrong in a personal concept is different from knowing what is right and wrong by others.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marsden, S, & Malander, M. (2001). Historical cases of unethical research. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Dakota, North Dakota. Retrieved from http://www.und.edu/instruct/wstevens/PROPOSALCLASS/MARSDEN&MELANDER2.htm…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sci207: Week 3 - Outline

    • 2359 Words
    • 10 Pages

    References: Bottcher, A., & Rex, A. (2012). Environmental science student manual. Sheridan, CO: eScience Labs.…

    • 2359 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grady, C. (2010). Do IRBs protect human research participants? JAMA, 304(10), 1122-1123. Retrieved from http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=186530…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goode, E., (1996). The ethics of deception in social research. A case study, 19, 11-12…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Services Ethics

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The benefits of risks of research must be distributed fairly. There should be fair processes and results to select the research subjects for both individuals and society.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays