Preview

Satire In Linnea Saukko's How To Poison The Earth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Satire In Linnea Saukko's How To Poison The Earth
Linnea Saukko wrote the piece “How to Poison the Earth”. The piece is a satire. A satire is the use of humorous, ironic, and exaggerative speech or writing to bring light to politics and other topical issues. Plenty of the nightly shows have adapted to this format. This format allows a speaker/writer to create a persona that mirrors them. This mirror persona is so amplified that the audience comes to the realization “on their own” that they hate this persona. The readers will take this and hate the speaker/writer’s allies. Saukko’s satire contains strong traces of sarcasm, facts, and a form of emotional appeal to create her argument.
Saukko’s persona could be described as Saukko with an extremely sarcastic attitude. On that note, the entire paper is a sarcastic statement. Sarcasm is conveying a concept through mocking and/or irony. Saukko uses both of these methods in her paper. In the paper, Saukko is purposely fake while mimicking or mocking those who actually support the issues discussed in her paper. In the first paragraph, Saukko says “we should generate as much waste as possible”. She does not actually believe that and is mimicking big business as a whole and exaggerating their stance on pollution.
Saukko is also ironic at some points. A great
…show more content…
She mentions “Surface water… will transport the poisons to places that cannot be contaminated directly”. This fact is important because it explains why the prevention of pollution to groundwater is so important. A similar fact on air pollution is “the wind will disperse the toxins while rain washes them from the air”. This amplifies the importance of preventing air pollution because the rain washes the air onto the land into our water. The air pollution comes from combustion and evaporation. Combustion comes too close to our hearts because combustion is why we have cars, energy, heat in our homes, and so many other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    She hook people with a quote that president Herbert Hoover promised at the intro and I think that was effective.And she gave a specific example of statistics from UN and also made a comparison with the specific example, the hybrid Toyota Prius, which is made for saving earth from the global warming. I think that helps to emphasize the practicality and excellency of having vegetarian meals. She also described how animal agriculture effect to global warming to make readers know the seriousness of the problem. Detailed facts help emphasize seriousness and make people feel more realistic about the problem. She also mentioned the other advantage beside global warming which is reducing water pollution. That can persuade people more with another good point of it. At the last paragraph, she gave a specific example of the way to get a vegetarian food to tell people it is not hard to do it. This article has been written on 2007 but I think this article still works in nowadays because the argument is still available and important issue for the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of Linnea Saukko’s “How to Poison the Earth” is to explain the process of poisoning the Earth. Saukko utilizes sarcasm throughout the essay while explaining the process of poisoning the Earth. For example, Saukko infers that since the earth continually undergoes renewal, humanity should produce more waste from uranium-238 and plutonium due to their longer half-life (Saukko 309). The ironic tone of the essay does not take away from the directive process analysis exhibited throughout the text. For instance, Sauko explains that releasing poisonous substances around the planet at a rate that the Earth could purge is how to efficiently poison the earth (Saukko 310). Furthermore, Suakko’s use of irony highlights the drastic consequences…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Popsicle Cycle Analysis

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The flora and fauna of the world is delightful to humankind, much like a popsicle might be a delight to an individual. When one considers the rainforests and the deforestation that takes place there in order to support a growing human population, this relates to the consumption of the popsicle. People may neglect to think about the consequences of deforestation or the use of fossil fuels, even though they may be a participant in these processes through their consumption of paper products or devices that need energy. The person consuming the popsicle might also be in denial about the impermanence of the popsicle, or the consequences of consuming it. Russ Crest, an author at Beautiful Decay magazine, says of Myers and Berg’s work; “ Sometimes something must be broken or fractured in order for us to see its value. This may be especially true for our environment. Only when we see the consequences of our actions do we begin to understand our complicity in fracturing it” (Crest). People do not notice the destruction of the environment until awareness is brought to it, either in their real life or in news media. Until then, people take nature for…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He exaggerates the advice he is about to give the students. He lets you believe that he is going to offer you serious advice, but then he gives a humorous one instead.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Often times, an individual can be defined as an environmentalist or a people-first critic. Saving the environment is the environmentalist's ultimate goal, while the people-first critics look more to the human aspect of everything. Scientist Edward O. Wilson satirizes the language of the two groups, and how unproductive their discussions are, through the use of hyperboles, insulting and stereotypical diction, and a created sense of situational irony.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satiric Essay

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The contradictive topic of environmentalism leads to unproductive discussions. Edward O. Wilson’s satire illustrates this concept through a unique structure, parallelism, and diction. The discussions of the topic, environmentalism, are unproductive and redundant in nature.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Satire On Global Warming

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I see pollutants rising into the atmosphere in deadly, clouded masses, Slowly depleting our sight of solid, green grasses. Killing the only planet sustainable for human beings. If our ecosystem is slowly dying, well what does that mean… for us?…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Satire Global Warming

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This planet has done countless things to keep us alive and well. this planet takes care of us so we need to start doing the same!Many people that it doesn't exist think it won't affect them. Global warming is everyone’s problem because this is our planet, our ice caps are melting, the Earth is getting warmer, which will leave us without winter.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Global Warming

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    WARNING! Life as we know it will cease to exist in about 10-15 years. Costal areas will flood, the air will be tainted with carbon dioxide, all volcanoes will erupt, and mountains will slide into oceans. We are to blame for this terrible disaster, humans have created global warming!…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions” (“Text A”), an international newspaper advertisement from Exxon Mobil and “An Agenda for Climate Action” (Text B”), a speech by Eileen Claussen, the President of Pew Center on Global Climate Change were both written in 2006 with the focus on global warming. The author in both commentaries strives to bring out the message that as human beings, we must take action to stop the worsening of climate change. Text A is a published article by a company that emphasizes that everyone in the world should be able to take part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and that illustrates the range of actions, in particular technological advances the company has taken to address the problem. As for Text B, it is a speech delivered to university students that identifies the ultimate cause of the problems of climatic change the world is facing now. Even though the message of the two texts is the same, the way they convey it differs, in terms of the structure and content, language usage, purpose, and narrative perspective.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The contamination of the air present in the atmosphere is known as “Air pollution”. Respiration is an important life process of all living things. We breathe in the air present in the atmosphere. Therefore if the air around us is contaminated with poisonous gases, it would have a fatal effect on us.…

    • 752 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Story Of The Stuff

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Story of the Stuff which is made by Annie Leonard was very interesting and enlightening. It made me realize that no matter how small the stuffs we use in our everyday life, it should not be taken for granted because the economic system is in crisis and we can't continue to run on a linear system since we live on a planet of limited resources. People become obsessed with consumerism, especially when it comes to new technologies. Things that we buy and then discard go through different phases: extraction, production, distribution, consumption and disposal. Corporations have become bigger than our government and the first limit to the system is exploitation of our natural resources. We are consuming products to the point where 1/3 of our natural resources are already used up with 30% of our waste being shipped to other areas of the world. Due to these instances, almost all of our forest have already been cut down, and yet this corporations who still wants to cut them have no “corporate environmental responsibility”, what they want is always earning more profit. They should think that if all the resources in earth runs out, even money can’t revert the damage they have done to these non-renewable resources. Also they can’t already buy these resources from the over-exploited third world countries. Yet the government hasn’t done enough actions to address these problems. I find it appalling and irresponsible of our government. Maybe just maybe they are doing actions or made rules and regulations to minimize these occurrences but still it wouldn’t be enough since corporations can lend money to those corrupt officials whose minds are obsessed with money then poof, the corporations will continue its operations. It is not merely the fault of the corporations or the government, each individuals also contributed on consuming the limited resources the earth…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The earth’s atmosphere is a constantly moving body of gases that encircle our planet. This body of gases known as air is a mixture, not a chemical combination, of a number of gases; that is, each gas retains its own characteristic properties. It consists of about 78 percent nitrogen; 21 percent oxygen, and carries along with it water vapor, clouds, dust, smoke, soot, and a variety of chemical compounds. The remaining one percent contains all the other gases including carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, ozone, methane, and ammonia that contribute to harmful pollutants that are released into the air. Millions of tons of harmful gases are released into the air each year. According to The World Health Organization, 2.4 million people die each year from causes directly attributable to air pollution, with 1.5 million of these deaths attributable to in-door air pollution (World Health Organization, www.who.int). For the past several decades’ air pollution has become more of a health risk factor. What is air pollution? Air pollution is air that enters our atmosphere that contains undesirable substances such as gases, dust, chemicals, particulate matter, biological materials, fumes or odor in harmful amounts. That is, amounts which could be harmful to the health or comfort or humans and animals or which could cause damage to plants and materials. The use and release of certain chemicals can be of serious concern if they have significant impacts on human health or the environment. The substances that cause air pollution are called pollutants. An air pollutant is known as a substance in the air that can cause harm to humans and the environment. Pollutants can be in the form of solid particles, liquid droplets, or gases. In addition, they may be natural or man-made. Pollutants that are pumped into our atmosphere and directly pollute the air are called primary pollutants. Pollutants can be classified as primary or secondary. Primary pollutants are directly…

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Air pollution is one of the most important environmental health threats of our time. It is a huge leading cause of death in the United States which includes heart disease, cancer, stroke, and chronic lower respiratory diseases. Air pollution and other air toxins damage our airways, lungs, heart, and circulatory systems. Exposure to these pollutants increase ones chance of having to go to the hospital and emergency room visits, time lost from school and work, and premature deaths due to disease.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oral Test

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dr.H : Well, people who are exposed to very polluted air can develop heart disease and lung…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays