Safe Injection Sites Research Paper

Opioid overdoses have recently become a notably broad issue over the past few years, taking the lives of over 250,000 Americans. With this problem raging out of control, safe injection sites are not a valid response to the opioid epidemic for four main reasons: there are other beneficial ways we can respond, government spendings will become an issue, the atmosphere of the injection site will be alarming, and lastly, providing drugs will not help the patient become drug-free. There are several other beneficial ways to respond to the opioid epidemic rather than using safe injection sites. Sending the patient to rehab or counseling will be a more suitable move to make. At rehab, they will be away from the temptation of consuming drugs into their system. Counseling will be beneficial because the counselors will provide comfort for the addicts, reassuring them that they are not alone in this battle. There will be a more positive outcome if the patient is encouraged to stop consuming drugs, instead of being supplied with the material to keep their addiction alive. Government spendings will be another conflict by using safe injection sites. “If a Ford Motor truck causes expectable deaths because the tuck is dangerous, Ford pays, not taxpayers” (Johnson 833). If taxpayers are not responsible for
“Imagine how neighbors will feel when street-based drug dealers surround the injection sites” (Johnson 833). Parents want their children to grow up in a safe and positive environment, and by having an injection site nearby will not be suitable. Children are easily influenced by their surroundings and notice every tiny thing. Besides using a “safe injection site” that gives out a negative influence on children, making them think that it is okay to have someone safely inject drugs into their system, we can create a better plan; one that provides a positive