Preview

Russia, Democratic or Not?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
296 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Russia, Democratic or Not?
By: Angelo Kraus
Block: 3B
2/21/2012
Russia, Democratic or Not?
Russia should be considered a semi-democratic country. They have the characteristics of a democratic country, yet at the same time they don't. For example, they have freedom of speech but to an extent. As shown in a round table discussion show that's been on air for years. But, its only good things are spoken about the government and Putin. Also they can vote and what not but the government tries to rig it. Another example is that people may oppose the government, but may not publicize it widely. A show of this would be like the man that broadcast his ideas about the government on the radio, but he is only aloud to at on station. Any other station has him blacklisted. So not many people hear his ideas. Another problem is there freedom to assemble. They can do this but only with the permission of the government. Also they sometimes pay kids to participate in rallies that oppose anyone against the government and Putin. And lets not forget about the private owned businesses because these are essential. In Russia businesses can be privately owned to an extent plus they can choose what to sell and how much, also they decide who they hire. Also, the Russian Federation confirms a citizen's right to state healthcare and medical assistance free of charge. Citizens do not pay for this but instead companies and government subsidies do. Plus the health care is poor. They may have well trained doctors but indecent equipment. This is a helping cause in the reason why the death rate is higher than the birth rate. The life expectancy is also low. These are all signs of a semi-democratic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1855, opposition to the Tsarist Government lacked an effective unifying ideology. This remained the case throughout the 1855-1964 period, even once the communists had taken power. A key contributing factor towards this was the lack of unity opposition possessed. Opposition throughout the period came from several sources, however it was dominated by division in opinion and ideology, only fully uniting in the February revolution of 1917 which brought down Nicholas II and the Romanov dynasty. Even then opposition still differed in opinion, however it was unified by one common cause. Throughout the period, the peasantry were providing opposition to Russian Government. However opposition was repeatedly ineffective. The Polish revolt of 1863 during Alexander II's reign was crushed by the army in much the same way as the 1953 East German revolt and the 1956 Hungarian rebellion were crushed under Khrushchev's tenure. A continuing feature throughout the period is the key role which the army played in limiting opposition from the peasantry, with military force frequently being deployed throughout the period. Lenin used it in the Civil War against the Green armies of the peasantry and Stalin used a similar style of brute force in the assault on the peasantry during the collectivisation process, albeit on a much grander scale. The army was very important to the state and their loyalty to Nicholas II during the 1905 revolution was vital in ensuring he was not deposed then instead of twelve years later. The peasantry also lacked a shared ideology and there were several other factors which meant that a full scale peasant revolt was never likely to occur. The demographic and general backwardness of Russia, whose weakness was repeatedly shown by failures in war throughout the period, meant that the peasantry were never going to unify because poor communications and transport links simply…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The students pull their desks into a semicircle. Someone cracks a joke about the failing eyesight of their octogenarian professor. "The old man can't see too well," one of the students says, "but he knows what's going on."…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, Russia has developed differently from the “western” civilization. Russia started off as being similar to the “western” culture, but overtime developed into one that the west never saw. Russia was influenced in it’s development from the conquest of the Mongols to Peter I. Russia also had unique features that were a first for societies in Europe and the rest of the world. Russia throughout history has been conquered by many different groups of people, from the Mongols to Peter I, and has many unique features including how it’s society was influenced and how it can be compared to “western” civilization. Russia started out like many other “western” societies with a single prince and single dynasty.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term authoritarian means complete obedience towards an authority in which the people do not have individual freedom and blindly submits to authority. In an authoritarian regime, power is often exercised by one person or a small elite group which means oppositional groups are often limited or does not existed therefore the country or state would be ruled by one party thus a centralised state. The Tsarist regime was a system of government that was ruled by a monarchy, the tsar, who people believed was appointed by God and this had lasted over several centuries since 1547 but eventually collapsed in 1917 as many of the people were upset towards the ruthlessness and unfairness of the Tsar. Tsarist and Leninist Russia both showed authoritarian…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia Change over Time

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With many new factors making the world globalized and as steps were taken toward modernization in the 1700s, the world underwent many changes, however still keeping some of its initial traditions. From 1700-1900 in Eastern Europe, the economy had switched from agricultural to manufacturing due to the growth of factories and industry in the 1800s and serfdom was abolished, however the tsars still remained the center of authority.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was more change than continuity in the ways in which Russia was ruled in the period 1855 to 1964? To what extent do you agree with this view?…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1905 all the tensions in Russia culminated in a revolution that nearly swept the Tsar from power. He had started a war with Japan in the hope that a quick victory would bring a surge of patriotism; however a series of humiliating defeats brought just the opposite. There were strikes in the factories and street demonstrations. In January 1905 a demonstration was fired on by the Cossacks and many were killed, this day is now known as Bloody Sunday. There were mutinies within the navy. Revolutionaries, including Lenin and Trotsky, returned from exile. Workers councils were formed in the cities. Whilst in the countryside, peasants murdered landlords and took over their land.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What exactly is meant by the term “democracy”? According to the rich and long history of democracy itself, it is doubtful that there is an appropriate and comprehensive definition of democracy exists. However, by studying the formation of democracy, there is a common agreement that the term “democracy” consists of the following characteristics: “regular free and fair elections, universal suffrage, and accountability of the state's administrative organs to the elected representatives, and effective guarantees for freedom of expression and association as well as protection against arbitrary state actions.” (Holden) Then, one could see the key term of democracy is the representation of the political system. In order to examine and question the “level of democracy” in the contemporary Northern states, it is necessary to analyze the representation of democracy, in particular, the implementation of new policies and remaining difficulty of democracy of Great Britain and France.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is America A Democracy?

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Interest groups are a necessity in our republic. That’s right. I said republic. The United States of America is not now, nor has it ever been a “democracy”.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    communism vs democracy

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Communism is an original system of society, quite different from Democracy in many ways. While total democracy is not widely spread, many forms of it are successful throughout the world today.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism vs Democracy

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Democracy and communism are the two main governing systems ever to be set into motion. Effects of both of these systems can be observed in many countries worldwide. Democracy is the political orientation of those who favor government by the people or by their elected representatives, whereas communism is a form of socialism that abolishes private ownership which means that all means of production such as land and natural resources are owned by the entire community. Of course, more modern forms of these two governances are adopted by the countries that prefer to do so. Although democracy and communism are two opposite governing systems, a certain amount of similarities can still be found.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cold War was a conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that lasted from the late 1940s to early 90s. It was primarily a result of the ongoing dispute between Democracy and Communism. Its name stemmed from the lack of direct, large-scale fighting between the two main powers. Although these two countries were the primary offenders, many other regions all over the world were affected by the political and militaristic tension.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic is the UK?

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to meeting the basic requirements for a modern democracy the UK is doing adequately. These requirements include guaranteeing basic human rights, separation of power between the institutions of state, freedom of opinion, freedom of religion, equal right to vote and good governance that lacks corruption. These are some of the key elements, there are clearly other factors that play a part in the definition of a democracy. Although the UK might seem like they meet all the requirements and abide to all the ‘rules’ and from a shallow point of view looks like an ideal democratic country, there is so much resistance that says otherwise - and it is justified.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy of Kyrgyzstan

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Is Kyrgyzstan a democratic country or is it still an authoritarian regime? Different experts might have different answers and opinions to this question. In order to find an accurate answer to this question, it is important to know profound definitions of both democracy and authoritarian regime. As a student who is still learning about democracy, I define democracy as a political system in which citizens have the power to elect politicians to present them, through a free and fair election. Also, I define an authoritarian regime as a political system in which government has the authority and the supreme power. In recent years several countries have made the transition from an authoritarian regime to democracy. Kyrgyzstan was one of such country that became democratized in the very recent days. Kyrgyzstan became democratized mainly because of the political, technological and economic changes that occurred within the county between 1991- 2010; however, during the transition process Kyrgyzstan faced a number of huge problems, which would possibly continue at least for another few years before Kyrgyzstan can settle down as a successful democratic country.…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays