Preview

Rules Of War In A Nutshell Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rules Of War In A Nutshell Analysis
The video Professor Crist provided, “Rules of War (In a Nutshell),” was very educational. Honestly, I was very unfamiliar with the rules of war and did not even know these set code of conduct existed during wartime situations. After watching the video and reading the text, I believe I have a better understanding of these norms. After having a greater understanding, I agree that there should be norms, which prevail during wartime situations. The norms should include, not targeting individuals who are not a threat (civilians and the unarmed), no damage of necessities, such as water systems and sources of food; lastly, no destruction a total population that cannot recover. I am personally not a fan of war, but I recognize the need to defend and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Summary Of War By Taeaa
    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of War By Taeaa

    deserve to receive this unbearable loss? It makes others wonder is it worth all of the suffering in this war? How many of our brothers and sisters have to pass before we realize the true negatives of the war? Close relatives and friends of these fallen soldiers may be so hurt from such a horrific loss that they are never able to fully recover. Making not only the dead soldiers victim, but also the family and friends of the soldier. Some of the victims close friends and family may never fully recover from a loss of this magnitude. Making it harder yet on the family creating not only an emotional problem but it physical problem due to depression and other side effects. For those lucky enough to return to their families, their recovery is…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Powers Resolution Analysis
    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page

    War Powers Resolution Analysis

    My initial reaction would be to side with Congress. The War Powers Resolution allows the president to engage in an act of war without the consent of congress only in the case of an attack on the United States, or by “statutory authorization”. Based on this, the legislative branch seems to be in the right in this situation. I would ask the president questions pertaining to the goals of the US forces in the region, and questions to Congress such as to their opposition to the presidents actions.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    War By Tim O Brein Analysis
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War By Tim O Brein Analysis

    Tim O’Brein is an author who often writes about war themed stories. He tries to make people feel and think about war, he himself was a war veteran. He served two years in the Vietnam War, the same war the Private First Class Paul Berlin is fighting in in the story. He makes points about how war can change a person, how war can scar your memories, and about how it can effect everybody.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Rules of Engagement
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Understanding Rules of Engagement

    The art of war has rules that are in place to insure that even in war, discipline is maintained. The Rules of Engagement (ROE) work well when each level adheres to the specific details assigned to them. The ROE also works well when the two opposing sides are equally matched. Understanding the ROE is key to understanding what went on during the war in Viet Nam. Each level of military combat has a responsibility and a role to play in the ROE.("," para. 4)…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hijacking The Good War Analysis
    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hijacking The Good War Analysis

    In the journal article critique “The Presence of the Present: Hijacking ‘Hijacking ‘The Good War’?” the authors, V. William Balthrop, Carole Blair, and Neil Michel, critique the WWII Memorial, which was opened up to the public in 2004. They state clearly in their thesis that “[They] contend that the Memorial’s rhetoric affirms contemporary U.S. imperialism under the revered sign of World War II, ‘speaking’ more about the present than about the past. [They] argue that this interpretation forwards important issues for memory studies, about assessing the ethical and political legitimacy of particular renditions of the past in the present”(Balthrop, Blari, Michel…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Wicked War Analysis
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Wicked War Analysis

    Looking back to American history, some cringe with regret at events that were catastrophic and villainous. While in some instances we overwhelmed with pride for the right decisions our ancestors chose. But it is events like the US - mexican war that brings us the realization that in order for America to be the great nation it is, the war was a necessary act. Amy Greenberg’s A Wicked War captures the lives of five important people that left their legacy in American history.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Pacifism
    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just War Pacifism

    Human beings have been fighting with each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it. The Ethics of War begins by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but there can be situations when war may be catastrophic. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just War Theory Obsolete Essay
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just War Theory Obsolete Essay

    Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative suggests three maxims which separate moral from immoral actions (Kant, 1981).The first aspect of this imperative states one can only act morally if the statement by which you are acting becomes universal law without contradiction and the consequences of such are logical (Kant, 1981). For example, if the statement ‘you ought not kill’ is put forward, the universal consequences are logical making it a moral statement. However, this statement is not true in war, especially in the case of nuclear warfare. Since this statement dictates an action must be universalized without contradiction, the concept and consequences of war become nonsensical and illogical due to the fact that anyone can murder anyone, not just in war and including yourself (Kant, 1981), making this just war theory obsolete.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Afghanistan War Ethics
    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Afghanistan War Ethics

    Are wars even supposed to have ethics? War ethics are important because a lot of people don 't even know they exist or if people even follow them. Civilized nations established the Humanitarian law; it is a law regarding how to confront enemies in a semi civilized way and mandates the treatment of prisoners of war (Masci 1013). This law is what raises a lot of hairs on religious leaders and causes anger since they feel that this law is not abided by. It seems that religion and war always tends to go along with war. Whether the wars are started by religions or its religious leaders having problems with how the wars are being fought. The law also states how prisoners are to be tried in the judicial system and if they are to have their trial in civilian or military courts. The main purpose of this law was an effort to control violence or even stop it. Another big factor of having this law the requirement it puts on governments to assess situations before they even start a war to make sure there is an imminent threat. On the down side, a lot of government officials feel that this law weakens the U. S. because of the peacekeeping could create backfires and end in war anyway. War ethics do exist and there will always be people who believe they are not followed. The people who follow or don 't follow these ethics will always stand out in one way or…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Good War Analysis
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Good War Analysis

    One usually associate war with slaughter and envy. War is a serious commitment and places financial burdens on the countries involved. In Studs Terkel’s book, The Good War, he reveals first hand accounts of war veterans and people involved in World War II. Most of these interviewers share their tortuous times at war, but enjoy talking about the good times they had. This gives light to personal development and positive gains that came from war. In my paper, I will focus on how some good came out of the bloodbath of World War II.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Morality Of Total War Analysis
    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Morality Of Total War Analysis

    War is never an easy discussion; it is a subject people constantly debate, especially in regards to total war. Questioning the morality of total war is an issue due to the elasticity of the definition, which is dependent upon the individual. General William T. Sherman’s total war strategy in Georgia and the Carolinas is arguably morally acceptable -even though it included waging war against the civilian population- when taking into account the benefits versus the costs. There were excessive actions taken by Sherman’s soldiers, which stemmed from their prejudices towards the southern population. However, as a result of Sherman’s plan the war ended in a swift victory for the North. The justification and by association the morality of total war…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    War Can Be Justified Analysis
    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages

    War Can Be Justified Analysis

    In today's society, the possession and effective use of force is necessary. We have to recognize that we live in an imperfect world where evil seems to be an inevitablity. Our constant need for power makes the idea of a violent free world unimaginable. As long as we continue on this power hungry path the political issues will continue on this same path. Force is necessary with our current societal conditions and can be looked at as irresponsible when a nation does not prepare for the necessity of force. Any political conversation that entails the words, truth, liberty or peace run hand in hand with the use of force to create them. The perspective of some people are…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Virtue Ethics Criticsm
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Virtue Ethics Criticsm

    Nussbaum says that there are absolutes. However, it is virtues that have value, not rules. We should strive for Justice, Wisdom, Temperance etc. rather than looking for absolute rules. When thinking about whether to go to war, there are no absolute rules (You must not kill an innocent person, for example, is seen as impractical as all wars lead to innocent people dying). However, we have elected a leader who we want to act justly, to be temperate, to have wisdom etc.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Of War: Similarities Between Ancient And Modern Warfare
    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Of War: Similarities Between Ancient And Modern Warfare

    Comparing from the times of Alexander the Great, warfare has immensely evolved. For almost 10,000 years, combat technologies did not change until around 1000 AD. During this time, the Chinese had discovered the potential of gun powder and were using it for fireworks. A few hundred years later, Arab and Western European powers had started to develop fire-arms and cannons (powered by gunpowder) for combating the Mongolians in the East and Native Americans in the West. In addition with the advancements of aerospace technologies, warfare has changed more than ever.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More