BOOK REVIEW RUBRIC Spring 2011
(5) 100- 90
(4) 89 - 80
(3) 79 - 70
(2) 69 - 60
(1) 59 & Below Response to Project Questions
Writer responds fully to all project questions.
Exceptional responses to questions; answers are given in depth and in meaningful ways. Includes specific material from book to support ideas.
Full responses to questions; answers are thoughtful. Includes some material from book to support ideas.
Adequate responses to question, but responses lack depth and detail. Answers lack substantive information from book. Answers may be uneven.
Attempts to respond to most questions; answers may be minimal. Lacks appropriate information from book to support ideas.
Responses to questions may be vague or incomplete; not all questions are responded to. Meaning/
Writer understands the book and communicates the book’s ideas using an historical context
Contains in-depth analysis with clear and insightful connections to the historical period. Ideas are richly developed, using many relevant details, quotes, and examples from the book.
Contains analysis with strong connections to the historical period. Ideas clearly developed; relevant and specific details, auotes, and examples support ideas.
Contains an understanding of the book’s ideas with some connections to the historical period. Some ideas are developed; references are specific, but may not contain details.
Understanding of book may be uneven or inaccurate. Lacks appropriate connections to the historical period. Ideas are incomplete or undeveloped; references not clear or are too brief.
Lacks understanding of book and fails to make appropriate connections to historical period. Ideas are not stated or developed; no references to the book or may only refer to one part of book. Organization
The book report has a logical and focused structure.
Clear focus, logical sequence, and skillful use of transitions.
Clear focus with logical sequence and good transitions.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document