Preview

Roper V. Simmons (2005)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Roper V. Simmons (2005)
Roper v Simmons (2005)
The case of Roper v Simmons revolves around the question, should children be sentenced to death for a crime that was committed prior to the age of 18. While the 8th and 14th Amendments guard against cruel and unusual punishment, does the punishment of death, for those whose crimes was committed when they were under the age of 18, automatically fall under the category cruel and unusual punishment? The Missouri Supreme Court, basing its decision partially on the Atkins v Georgia decision by the U.S Supreme Court which concluded that executing the mentally ill was a violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments, ruled that Roper v Simmons fell under the category of cruel and unusual punishment. This decision led the state

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ferrell V. Elrod 469

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If profits can be shown with reasonable certainty, there is no reason to penalize the enterprise of the founder of a new business by denying remedy for losses occasioned by the default of the defendant. Ferrell v. Elrod 469 S.W. 2d at 686…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper (2005) is a United States Supreme court ruling related to capital punishment for juveniles under the age of 18. The case stands for the proposition that it is unconstitutional to sentence to death juveniles who are charged with murder before attaining the age of 18 (Roper, 2005). In this case, Christopher Simmons, a 17-year old boy, was convicted and sentenced to death in 1993 for robbing a woman in her home then afterwards kidnapping her and throwing her off a bridge to her death (Roper, 2005). This sentencing was followed by a series of appeals to federal and state courts with each being rejected.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R15523, 17425. Rivera now said he was walking on Hickory Street when Holly Staker, who was wearing a sleeveless shirt and a pair of tight shorts, invited him up to the apartment. Rivera said it was dark in the apartment and a little boy and girl were playing inside. Id. At one point, Holly Staker changed the little girl’s diaper. Rivera stated that Holly Staker then changed into a nightgown and tried to seduce him, but he resisted her advances. At this point, the little boy went outside to play. Rivera continued that Holly Staker persisted in her sexual advances and they had intercourse, although he did not think he ejaculated because he was concerned about pregnancy. The sexual activity was interrupted when the little girl cried in the next room, and Rivera decided he did not want to continue. At this point, according to Rivera’s statement, Holly Staker got angry that he refused to continue having sex and brandished a knife, which she began swinging at Rivera. Rivera said he grabbed her arms and started punching her without realizing the knife was cutting her. He did not know how many times he cut her, but it was more than twice. Rivera stated that he washed the knife and his hands near the kitchen sink and ran out the back door of the apartment. He threw the knife, which he had broken into two pieces, to the ground. Rivera said he then went home and burned his clothes in the dumpster behind his house, after which he walked back to Hickory Street and saw the police and the woman for whom Holly Staker was babysitting. R14617-25, 15475-84,…

    • 4813 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Smith v. United States, the plaintiff, John Angus Smith, was convicted of engaging in drug-trafficking, which would have granted him a five year sentence had he not “used” a firearm in regards to the incident. As stated in statute 924(c)(1), the use of firearm in relations to a drug-trafficking crime enhanced the sentence, and turned it into a 30-year sentence. The argument at hand is whether the term “use” was to be taken from a broad dictionary definition or in the ordinary meaning. The majority of the court argued that the term “use” should not be limited to the intended use of the firearm (as a weapon) as they exemplified cases of which the firearm was used as a bludgeon even though that was not it’s intended purpose, yet…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this case of Goldberg v. Kelly we have an issue that discusses the termination of welfare to a recipient. Now what seems to be the issue here is that there used to be no federal or state law on how to regulate this and enforce this but only a procedure that the New York State 's general Home Relief program adopted to use and follow. The sole issue of the problem is accepting the fact that a person with life depending needs could lose their financial aid and determining just exactly how those procedures should be carried out and exactly what they will be. The Home Relief program adopted a procedure that notifies the person to be terminated from the financial aid funds a minimum of 7 days before it can be enforced. The recipient is then allowed to request a higher official examine their case and is allowed to meet with that caseworker to be presented the evidence on why they are being terminated from the system. The only option that the welfare recipient have is to write a personal letter or one assisted by an attorney and request that a higher supervisor take look at their case. The recipient has the right to request a fair hearing after all of this and is then allowed to present their arguments orally and cross examine the witnesses against him/her. If the recipient prevails at the hearing his is then awarded all his held funds that were being held. This is where the argument comes in as to whether the recipient should be awarded the right to a fair trial before the termination that takes effect after a quick 7 days. As I had stated before the main issue at thought is assuming these recipients rely on these funds and should not lose the right to these funds without a fair trial.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This case involves the Plaintiff, Kelly Pryor, and the Defendant, National Collegiate Athletic Association, in a complex argument that involves racial discrimination under Title VI and the NCAA adoption of Proposition 16 as well as Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation claims. The court must carefully consider the claims Pryor has brought forth and determine if the discrimination of Proposition 16 was purposefully adopted by adding certain education requirement to ultimately hinder the amount of scholarships awarded to incoming black student athletes. Throughout this case analysis, I will weigh the different evidence presented from both parties and report the court’s reasoning for decisions made in Pryor v. NCAA.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case involved a conflict between the beliefs of the Old Order Amish and government regulations on employment and Social Security. The Amish regard the care of the sick and elderly to be one of their religious obligations; as a consequence, they believe that paying Social Security taxes (designed to care for the sick and elderly) would entail acknowledging that the government had that task rather than they. Thus, paying Social Security taxes would mean denying an important aspect of their faith.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    complaint made by Gregory and in my opinion, though the rules and regulations of the…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aarons V. Peterson

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ISSUE Is the defendant negligent and liable for injuries to the plaintiff? RULES In negligence, a plaintiff must prove: duty; breach duty; causation; and actual injury. Cite A person owes a heightened duty of care where children may be present.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Burr V. Allred

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Burr V. Allred was born on march 29 1899 in Bowie, Texas. Burr and V were the names of his uncles and he was known as Vee until he was older. While enlisting clerks did not want to type Allred's whole name so they dropped the Burr and the V was sometimes mistaken for a roman numeral, but Allred did not mind the change and continued to use the new name the rest of his life. His father was Renne and mother was Mary (Henson) Allred. He was one of nine children and had a strictly-disciplined home, by having a lot of sibling he learned to have patience and tolerance. What he learned in that home stood him in good stead throughout his career as a statesman. As a boy James also worked as a shoeshiner, soda pop bottler and newspaper boy and kept…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988, Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case, Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989), divided the court which eventually rejected that the Constitution excludes capital punishment for minors of this age group. Roper vs. Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford vs. Kentucky. Only seven countries in the past century have favored execution of minors convicted of capital crimes: Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jaffee V. Redmond (1996)

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jaffee v.Redmond (1996) The case of Jaffee v. Redmond was taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1996. The issue was whether a psychotherapist-patient would be recognized under Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Court granted a decision that recognized the existence of such a privilege holding that confidential communications of a licensed social worker and a police officer be protected from compelled disclosure As reported by Levy (1996), the Court decided that all communication between a patient and a psychotherapist falls under the umbrella of privilege and, the psychotherapist can’t under be forced by the courts to disclose such information.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declared laws that require judges to impose life-without-parole sentences for juveniles to be in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishments.” The decision ( Miller v. Alabama ) was a 5-4 split in the Court – which is typical of many such decisions that apply the cruel and unusual punishment provision.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons V. Ogden

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After a four year hiatus in the Supreme Court docket, the court finally rule in 1824, the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, which eventually proclaimed the federally supremacy clause and the commerce clause, but it's impact of American commerce can still be felt today.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 5350 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Starting in 1642 within British America, an estimated 365[74] juvenile offenders were executed by the states and federal government of the United States.[75] The United States Supreme Court abolished capital punishment for offenders under the age of 16 in Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988), and for all juveniles in Roper v. Simmons (2005). In addition, in 2002, the United States Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the execution of individuals with mental retardation, in Atkins v. Virginia.[76]…

    • 5350 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays