Preview

Ronald M Green Building Baby From The Genes USmmary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ronald M Green Building Baby From The Genes USmmary
The essay “Building Baby from the Genes Up” by Ronald M. Green explains how in the future, parents might be able to design the genes of their future baby. Green supports genetic engineering of embryos, “why not improve our genome?” (549). He thinks that with the process of in vitro and preimplantation, it could eliminate disease or confer desirable features onto our future. Some medical professionals is concerned about the effect of genetic selection in parenting, Green said “The critics concerns may be less troublesome than they appear”, he thinks that parents will not love their children any less in the quest of perfection, and any kids will not be pressured to live up to perfectionist and expectation. The advancing knowledge in genetic …show more content…
Also, the possibilities of diminishing illness and disabilities via genetic technologies are what Green is trying to explain. Even though the process gives the parents “perfect child” how would you feel that your child is not made up of your genes; instead, it is someone that might not be even related to you? In my opinion, the processes are dangerous, what if there is a misapplied of genes? What going to happen next? Try again? This is something that we shouldn’t tolerate, because it’s not right. People should be just happy of what God gives to us, because it’s a gift. All the things that Green said that the diseases that we can prevent on having, like obesity, are something that we have control over. It can be passed along the genes of your kids, but there are ways to prevent it to happen, like eating balanced diet or preventing fast food chains. The diseases like obesity, diabetes, and etc are just common sense, since we have high technology today, we can find ways to avoid this to get worst. So, what if parents want a beautiful kid and he/she might turn out being not looking alike with his/ her parents? I think that parent doesn’t realize that their kid might face discrimination and bullying. Children who are designed may not be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author also makes it clear there are many people for designer babies; they see the positives to the “mad science”. Many families will use this after having one child with a disease and they want to be sure their next child doesn’t suffer from the same thing. People who carry genes that may cause life threatening childhood illness should be able to have healthy children if science can assist them, said an anonymous scientist. Tuhus-…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic coding allows parents to pick and choose the sex of their baby, the height that their baby will be, how athletic the baby will grow up to be and as genetic coding happens more and more, the more things that we will be able to modify through genetic coding takes away the opportunity that each child will grow up to be whatever/whoever they want to be. Sandel says it best when he says, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design or products of our will or instruments of our ambition” (Sandel 128), that we should accept and love our children for who they are, to teach them right from wrong and then from there, let them make their own…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie GATTACA, the audience is shown a new, futuristic world, in which the genetics of any offspring can be changed and altered to create a genetically perfect child, known as a "valid". In this new society, having an embryo genetically altered, and then inserted into the uterus of the mother, much like IVF, is seen as the "normal" way to conceive, and the previously normal, now atypical "faith birth" wherein intercourse is the cause of conception, is frowned upon, as it produces genetically "invalid" children. Everything, from the gender of the child, to the colour of their hair, can be manipulated, and is rationalized by stating that the child is "Still you, just the very best of you". In this type of society, only the genotype is important, and all else is regarded. Morally and ethically, society knows realistically that perfection does not exist, and it is the flaws within humans that set us apart from other species.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although this may sound convincing it does not eliminate the fact that there will still be the temptation for parents to “design” their own babies farther than just preventing diseases, but favorable physical traits which could lead to another mass superiority to a standard image as in the Holocaust. “many discussions about the ethics of cloning, of potential genetic manipulation and selection of ‘designer babies,’ and of eugenic dreams fueled by purported racial, cultural, and aesthetic ‘superiority’” (Babies, Bodies and Buyers).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    whether its deciding on dinner or picking out floor plans for a new home. But…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although not unanimously supported, the use of pre-embryonic diagnosis to screen for disease is generally accepted, this however leads to debate about how much freedom people should be allowed to make decisions about their future children. The issues arise as it is difficult to take an objective view on the topic, with many factors affecting peoples’ views. As there is in fact already a process of natural selection, perhaps it would be best to allow this to progress at its natural rate. On the other hand, if it is possible to allow people to decide elements of their child’s future, then who has the right to stop them from doing so? Can it be reasonable for a group of doctors and politicians to decide the fate of a generation? Especially where health matters are concerned.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Typically, genetic engineering is viewed as a drive for mastery which deviates from the appreciation of nature and the gift of life (Sandel 9). Sandel believes it is against our human nature to tamper with genetics because it strips us of our humility. For example, parents are supposed to nurture and love their kids but genetically modifying them takes away that relationship. Children are a precious gift and should be accepted for who they are, not for what society dictates is “perfect”. Strengthening his argument, Sandel brings our attention to two types of love: accepting and transformative. A parent who displays accepting love is “open to the unbidden” of their child and loves them for who they are (Sandel 11). They focus more on the being of their child rather than their well-being. Alternatively, transformative love seeks to change the child assuming something is wrong with them in the first place. As one can see, this type of love is similar to germline engineering, in that its focus is on well-being. The problem that Sandel discusses is how parents are unable to maintain a balance between the acceptance and need for success from their child. A parent’s need to mold their children’s lives leads to the larger problem of hyper-parenting. Oftentimes, they get caught up in setting their child up for success and perfecting them. This brings us back to the point…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic is “designer babies.” Pre-natal screening for certain conditions like Down Syndrome is common practice, at least in places that offer that option. But now there’s a fertility clinic in Los Angeles that says it will soon help couples select for non-medical markers. It’s already possible to choose your unborn child’s gender. As genetics research advances, parents may soon have many more choices available to them: their child’s size, hair color, and intelligence. Because of gene technology, inherited diseases may someday be a thing of the past.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The society that we all live in today is so set on achieving the impossible. With a new era of technology unfolding before our eyes, the question of morality and where the line is drawn continues to threaten our society and leads to ponder whether or not these advancements are truly positive for the human race collectively. Science has progressed so profoundly over time, that the idea of turning a baby into an ideal, or “designer” baby is starting to become realistic. Another medical breakthrough is the concept of cloning, and wondering how far can we can take this type of power over mother nature. Genetic mutations also have a high probability of negative impact in…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Want a smart Kristen, or a smart Michael? A designer baby may be the answer to a parent’s prayer for genius babies. A designer baby is a child born as a result of pre-implantation screening or genetic modification .Embryo screening combined with IVF allows screening of disease- causing genes and also help in the selection of cosmetic traits like eye color, hair color, and even intelligence. Researchers can now use Gene therapy to introduce new traits in the embryonic stage of the baby and hence alter the genetic makeup. However, do we have the right to play GOD? This paper will argue as to why these embryo manipulating technologies are highly unethical and also highlight possible socioeconomic issues. This paper will also recognize the need…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    If prospective parents could give their unborn child the possibility of possessing the “perfect genetic package,” should they do it? What would be the repercussions? The term “designer baby” is defined as a baby whose genetic makeup has been artificially selected and controlled by genetic engineering, combined with in vitro fertilization to ensure the presence or absence of particular genes or characteristics in order to satisfy his or her parents’ expectations (Johnson). Where should the line be drawn? Should it be allowed to genetically modify, design or alter children solely at their parents’ discretion? With major progression through research, genetic…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hereditarily screening our posterity to improve individuals is simply dependable child rearing and an ethical commitment. As guardians we need our children to experience their fullest capacities. Genetically altering babies could be viewed as an "ethical commitment" as it makes them grow up into "morally better kids", this in light of a couple of hereditary connections to 'identity issue. Genetically modifying individuals can help improve the quality of life and overall make up the society by allowing parents to choose the DNA makeup of their offspring.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits of Genetics Engineering Medical technology is used for a vast range of diagnostics, treatments and to monitor patients. All the past studies included gained knowledge is actively moving to the empowerment to a disease-free life. This process is known was genetic engineering, which is modification of the genetics to combat illness. The process of engineering is completed by changing the sequences of the DNA protein, either recombining or taking out the found mutated gene. Through the years, we were able to enhance human life over its maximum expectancy and still continue to progress.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people believe the idea of “designer babies”, altering the genes of an unborn baby for parent’s desired traits, to be unethical. The main reason for this is that because it would create massive decrease diversity, because of the fact parents would be choosing their children’s traits. In Bonnie Steinbock’s article, “The art of medicine: Designer babies: choosing our children's genes”, published in 2008, Steinbock explains how he believes designing your children is morally wrong because children wouldn’t be able to express themselves. Steinbock says, “Perhaps the objection is to the fact that the child’s genes were chosen for him by his parents, thus forcing the child to have certain talents and not others” (Steinbock). He believed that the child would have no input into what they want to pursue in their life. Part of being a child means trying different things to find the one thing they really desire. If parents genetically engineered their child to be good a musician, that would be the only talent they would have. At this time in history, people, including Steinbock viewed the procedure of designing babies to be very wrong and that it should not be…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therapeutic Therapy

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Parents have the right to genetically engineer their children before birth. There are two areas of this technology one that modifies and enhances the natural human capacity while the other is therapeutic and heals. To be able to genetically change genes for therapy reasons should not be arguable. Therapeutic reasons consist of cancer, obesity, and depression. All these issues can be fixed by genetically controlling genes that may be the cause of them. It is important to continue research for this. Other countries would also see the advantage of this groundbreaking technology. “With knowledge comes power. If we understand the genetic causes of obesity, for example, we can intervene by means of embryo selection to produce a child with a reduced…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays