Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Rome and Han Empires

Good Essays
655 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rome and Han Empires
From about 30 B.C.E to the 200’s A.C.E the Roman and the Han Empire’s fell. The Roman Empire had 2 centuries of Pax Romana (Peace in Rome) that ended with the death of Marcus Aurelius and started the decline and fall of the empire. In the Han Empire Liu Bang ruled the Empire very peacefully and restores unity to China, Bang established a centralized government, lowered taxes and softened punishments. Following Bang’s death Wudi ruled the Han empire and was known as the Martial Emperor because he wanted to expand China through wars, both Wudi and Bang were very successful leaders but after the death of Wudi china experienced many bad rulers and thus starting the fall of the Han Empire. Internal and external factors led to the decline and fall of classical empires like the Romans and the Han.

The fall of Rome was caused by many different internal and external reasons. One internal reason the Roman Empire fell was because of the weakening economy and inflation. In the text it says “Desperate for revenue, the government raised taxes, It also started minting coins that contained less and less silver.” By doing this the government made a huge mistake. Raising taxes made the civilians angry that they had to pay more, and minting coins with less silver caused inflation because they didn’t have enough metal to back it. This caused Rome to fall because the gap between the rich and poor grew even larger because of these mistakes. An external reason that Rome fell is that The Huns lead by Attilla started to attack the Empire. In the book it states“With 100,000 soldiers, Atilla terrorized both halves of the Empire. In the East, his armies attacked and plundered 70 cities.” The Huns along with the Germanic invasions hurt the Empire very badly and was one of the main factors it fell. These internal and external factors are why The Roman Empire fell the way it did.

The reason the Han empire fell was because of the internal and external factors. A main internal factor that lead to the fall of the Han was the economic imbalance. There was a large gap between the rich and the poor, and the customs allowed the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. A quote from the book explains this, “Small farmers went into debt and had to borrow money from large landowners, who charged very high interest rates. If the farmer could not pay back the debt, the landowner took possession of all the farmer’s land.” A lot of farmers that did this often could not pay back the high rates back and lost there land. This caused the large gap between the rich and poor consequently leading to the fall of the Han Empire. Additionally an external factor that lead to the fall is that Wang Mang overthrew the Empire in 9 A.D. “In 9 A.D. Wang Mang took the imperial title for himself and overthrew the Han, thus ending the former Han, the frist half of the Han Dynasty” Wang Mang was acting as a regent for six years for an infant that was crowned, but decided the Han Dynasty shouldn’t be in power still. Many people did like Mang so in 23 A.D. a group of rebels assassinated him starting the second half of the Han dynasty. If these internal and external factors did not happen then the Empire may not have fell the way it did.

Overall the Roman and Han Empires decline and fall happened because of internal and external factors. These Empires were two of the largest empires ever and they both were very similar and came to end because of many of the same reasons. We need to know how this happend and why it did so other countries or empires don’t fall the way these did.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There are no definitive causes for the fall of the Roman Empire, yet there are multiple valid reasons as to why it happened such as military power, social problems, widespread of diseases, and moral strength. The Romans had the power to repair what went wrong, yet they let the chaos get the better of the in a time when they had little control in a very uncivilized…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collapse of Rome and Han

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The collapse of Han and Rome empires were also very different and unique from each other. The Roman empire fell because of Civil Wars, and plagues throughout the country. After trying to buy loyalty from the army Rome became bankrupt. The Roman empire had gotten so big that it was difficult to defend against all foreign forces. These all contributed to the fall of Rome. The Han mainly fell because it was incredibly difficult to defend against invaders along the extremely long border. The small food supply, and internal power struggles also added to the collapse of the Han empire.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay #1-Compare and Contrast the Han and Roman Empires in terms of their technological achievements…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    China And Rome Dbq Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire both expanded their boundaries to the point where many thought they would be impossible to defeat. Regardless of that power, both empires had very devastating falls. Though they were both very different societies, China having a centralized bureaucracy, and Rome having a rule based on laws and private authorities, like many empires, many aspects of their defeat are similar. Some of the ideas contributing to this fall was the stress on military, the high taxes placed on citizens, and the religions of each empire.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han Dynasty Causes

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Han Empire was one of the strongest classical empires. It prevailed long before many others have fallen. The Han has achieved many things but for many reasons did not last. “all great things must come to an end”, and for the Han being such a great empire its reasons were lack of leadership, rebellions or civil wars, unstable religion, and being unable to protect themselves from outsiders.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the first millennium CE, the Han Dynasty in the East and the Roman Empire in the West had risen to take control of large areas of the world, growing into feared and adored societies. While these empires reached its height in territory, wealth and status, they also were involved in problems that led to the decline and fall of their societies. The Roman Empire officially collapsed in 476 CE and the Han Dynasty officially collapsed in 200 CE.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many reasons for the decline and fall of the Roman Empire. Each document in this essay explains a different reason. Some causes were: political, economic, social, and military differences and problems. Basically, the problem was that the gap between the rich aristocrats and the poor serfs got bigger and bigger; the rich got richer as the poor got poorer. Also, when something grows, it always falls back down. In Document 1, an excerpt from a book was taken out. According to the authors, the basic problems facing the Western Roman Empire came from the people that gave up devotion to the old civilization and didn't believe that it was worth saving. Why should they care about their land if they weren't allowed to take part in government say, they couldn't form groups to protect themselves, and were even excluded from their own army? The practically jobless people realized that their cities were slowly falling, but no one bothered to stop their decline; it was something that had to happen. The loss of popular support to the oppressive government, increased government corruption, division of the empire, and internal power struggles were some political causes that led to the fall of Rome. In Document 2, two causes for the fall of Rome were: the large size, and the introduction to Christianity. Because the Empire grew too large, it became uneasy to control. It was inevitable for the fall to occur, no matter how much anyone tried. Jesus' introduction to Christianity also started a change. The clergy (priests) helped change the moral values of society. It no longer mattered much, and military power was buried or thrown away. The rich's wealth was taken away and given to charity (poor). In Document 3, the Muller's explanation for the decline was an economic issue. As the Empire grew stronger, so did economy. When the Empire started to decline, business ceased and there was little progress, so that also crashed along with the empire itself. Slavery caused another…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays