Preview

Right to Confront

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2014 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Confront
The confrontation clause has been a valued law in American courts throughout our history, although the clause has seen some discord. The confrontation clause specifically states that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witness against him. This clause was brought about to protect rights of the accused in criminal prosecutions, by allowing cross examination and allowing the accused to look the witness against him in the eye. Particularly in the case Coy v. Iowa, John Coy tested this constitutional right against the state of Iowa. Coy was set free after being convicted of sexually assaulting two thirteen year old girls. A technicality in how the case took place was ultimately the basis of Coy’s release, and not evidence that lead to the original guilty verdict. Though the right to confront is a highly valued right here in America, certain cases involving children, exceptions have to be made and clarified to protect children in the sexual abuse cases. There are some laws regarding sexual abuse cases and children, but the proper system has yet to be set up to guarantee protection for children in all sexual abuse cases. As in the case with Coy v. Iowa the lack of clarification in the confrontation clause resulted in John Coy’s release. Coy was tried for sexually assaulting two 13-year-old girls, Kathy Brown and Lynda Thompson. Brown and Thompson were sleeping in their makeshift tent in their backyard when a masked man came into their tent in the night, grabbed them both by the throat and declared, “If you scream, I will knock you out.” The masked man then continued to sexually assault them in a lascivious manner. As daylight arrived and the assault came to an end the girls were left terrified and battered. The girls never did see the face of their assaulter, but they did remember certain details about the night. They recalled a plastic cup that was urinated in during the assault, the flashlight that was used by


Cited: Alderman, Ellen, and Caroline Kennedy. In Our Defense: the Bill of Rights in Action. New York: Morrow, 1991. Print. "Child Abuse Research and Statistics." Sexual Abuse. Web. 11 Nov. 2010. . "Coy v. Iowa, U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument." The Oyez Project | U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument Recordings, Case Abstracts and More. Web. 29 Nov. 2010. . Grearson, Katherine W. "Proposed Uniform Child Witness Testimony ACT: An Impermissible Abridgement of Criminal Defendants ' Rights." Boston College. Web. 29 Nov. 2010. . "Maryland v. Craig, U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument." The Oyez Project | U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument Recordings, Case Abstracts and More. Web. 29 Nov. 2010. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Doe Court Cases

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The cased being studied in this article discusses the occurrence of the military officer, John Doe, who is reported as an alleged abuser of his 13 year old daughter, Mary Jane. The allegations of physical abuse occurred on a Sunday afternoon when John Doe was at home on leave. He instructed his daughter,Mary Jane, to do her homework after she helped with preparing dinner. She was given an hour to complete all her homework without any mistakes. When NCO Doe came back to check on her she had not yet completed her homework and was watching television instead. John Doe decided to give her another chance of 30 minutes to complete the assignment. One the second attempt he found her still watching television and instructed her to turn it off and to continue with her homework. When NCO Doe came back for a third time, Mary Jane still had not completed her homework.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palko Case Summary

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Interpretation of the Bill of Rights is a task that provides great challenge for the…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buffets v. Klinke

    • 3142 Words
    • 10 Pages

    PRIOR HISTORY: [**1] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. D.C. No. CV-92-00370-FVS. Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding.…

    • 3142 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution’s Structural Limits on Power Should Be the Focus of the Bill of Rights” contains many valuable insights. In particular, it re-affirms the proposition – lost for many years but perhaps gaining some new currency – that the so-called “structural” provisions of the Constitution are, and were intended to be, not merely matters of mundane and perhaps outdated institutional design but core protections of individual liberty. Further, it rightly emphasizes that the antifederalist-inspired Bill of Rights amendments work together with the Constitution’s structural provisions to limit government and promote individual liberty by reducing the federal government’s power even in areas in which it is granted authority.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp v Ohio

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ii. On May 23, 1957, police officers in Cleveland, Ohio believed that a suspect in a bombing, as well as some illegal gambling equipment, might be found in the home of Dollree Mapp. Officers went to the home and asked for permission to enter, but Mapp refused them without a search warrant. Three hours later, the two returned with several other officers. Showing off a piece of paper, they broke in the door. Mapp asked to see the “warrant” and took it from an officer, putting it in her dress. The officers struggled to take it away from Mapp and snatched the piece of paper away from her. They then handcuffed her. The 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures” and the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights under the 14th Amendment was questioned before the Court. The illegal search in Mapp’s home and whether the evidence was admissible was challenged by many.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.” The Court also held that “without proper safeguards, the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so freely.” Therefore, a defendant “must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires.” As those reasons, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona in Miranda, reversed the judgment of the New York Court of Appeals in Vignera, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Westover, and affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of California in Stewart.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    HOLDING: NO, the defendants did not get an adequate defense and yes the defendant’s rights were abridged.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Court maintained that the defendant's right against self-incrimination has long been part of Anglo-American law as a means to equalize the vulnerability inherent in being detained. Such a position, unchecked, can often lead to government abuse. For example, the Court cited the continued high incidence of police violence designed to compel confessions from a suspect. This and other…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monk, Linda. The Bill of Rights: A User 's Guide. New York: Close up Foundation, 1991.…

    • 2692 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attorney Moore’s argument made no difference at the time because Miranda was found guilty of robbery and rape (11). Miranda was considered by almost parties involved to be guilty. The question that was beginning to be asked was when can “suspects” protect themselves with their constitutional rights? These thoughts were still rumbling around in the nation when another trial happened that raised the volume of those rumblings.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Liberties

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Objective 1: Understand the constitutional basis of civil liberties and the Supreme Court's role in defining them.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing Evidence

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When these types of statements are introduced, Confrontation Clause issues arise. Under the 6th amendment, an accused has the right to confront the witness against him. The courts have shifted in their approach to the analysis regarding the confrontation clause.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Jacoby, Susan. "First Amendment Junkie." Critical Thinking. Barnet, Sylvan and Hugo Bedaw. Boston: Bedford St. Martin, 2005. 41-43.…

    • 518 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anthony Lewis has always held his head high where it has concerned the American Judiciary – Lewis’ praise for the American judiciary is arguably sensible and thorough in its worthy aspect. Not only does he excel as a reporter and a columnist at the New York Times, but where it concerns his authorship he has been equally exceptional in his craft. In his latest book, “Freedom for the Thought That We Hate” Lewis has the same heroic view of the American Judiciary to portray and he does it with his usual flair, with his typical – subtle, but very much inherent – admiration for the Judiciary, and for everything that he stands for. Similar to his incomparable, thorough, and critical account of the 1963 Supreme Court Case, Lewis does not lag in sending…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    who take the opposite view also seem to have just as valid an argument. Which…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays