Rick Reilly begins his article by attempting to make people think cheerleading is one of the most dangerous sports that high school’s offer. He backs this idea through the concepts of logos. He uses a report by The Physician and Sportsmedicine to back his point that cheerleading is dangerous. This was a good use of authority. Rick Reilly follows this up with an assertion that cheerleading is more dangerous than football (100). This start was a good way to …show more content…
He starts throwing punches and being aggressive with his statements. He uses authority to say that cheerleaders are not all perfect. There were professional cheerleaders that do drugs, and do whatever it takes to be skinny, even if it’s not healthy. This is a good point, but he goes about the wrong way of saying it. He uses sarcasm to back this statement and it just comes out wrong. After that he shows his true reasoning for writing the article. He comes out and says it might be a hard topic to write against. Cheerleaders are like baseball, an American tradition, but someone needed to stand out against them and be the bad guy. Women have had equal rights for a long time now and do not have to show off the guys any more. This is the point he has been trying to make throughout the whole