Preview

Rh Bill

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rh Bill
Good grief! Less than two weeks after it was enacted into law, the still controversial Reproductive Health Law, otherwise known as Republic Act No. 10354 or the “Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of

The RH law is now in the hands of our Supreme Court justices. Though I’m an atheist let me say this: “God help us…”
2012″, was challenged as unconstitutional in the Supreme Court on the ground that it “mocks the nation’s Filipino culture”.
This is unbelievable. No, this ismadness!
Yes, perhaps the new law mocks ‘our’ collectivist, welfare or palamuninculture, but there are better, more urgent reasons why it should be invalidated by this impoverished land’s court of last resort.
Petitioners, couple James and Lovely Imbong, on behalf of their young children and the Magnificat Child Development Center, filed a 25-page petition for a writ of certiorari, claiming the measure, which aims to promote contraception, sexual education and family planning programs and is strongly opposed by the country’s Roman Catholic Church, is invalid and should be nullified.
“This case will present the illegality of the Act as it mocks the nation’s Filipino culture–noble and lofty in its values and holdings on life, motherhood and family life–now the fragile lifeblood of a treasured culture that today stands solitary but proud in contrast to other nations,” petitioners said.
Named respondents are Executive Secretary Paquito Ochoa, Budget Secretary Florencio Abad, Health Secretary Enrique Ona, Education Secretary Armin Luistro and Interior and Local Government Secretary Manuel Roxas II.
Here’s a piece of advice: If the Catholics really want to stop the law, they should file a more serious, more legal-plus-secular-sounding petition.
I disagree with their shallow evaluation or argument that is obviously grounded in religion.
The RH law is unconstitutional, invalid, immoral and evil because it violates individual rights. This is the only reason why we must all oppose

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    They wanted to appeal because they believed that the people’s rights were being infringed upon. The Supreme Court found that Connecticut law violated the “right to marital privacy” (McBride, 2007). The First Amendment has a penumbra where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). The Fourth and Fifth Amendments are described as protection against all governmental invasions "of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life” (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). Planned Parenthood asserted, “the state cannot dictate to husbands and wives what they may and may not do in their marital relations” (Stein, 2010, p. 100). The Supreme Courts stated that the state of Connecticut has to prove to the Courts that its law is "compelling" and "absolutely necessary" in order for the Supreme Court to overcome that right (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). Griswold was the a pro-marriage ruling and given the fact it was a case involving marriage and sex law, the decision strengthened the supremacy of heteronormative sexual expression (Stein, 2010, p. 29). The Oxford Dictionary defines heteronormative as Denoting or relating to a worldview that promotes heterosexuality as the normal or preferred sexual orientation (Oxford, 2015). With the Supreme Court ruling it provided married couples with privacy. The lawyer in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut mentioned, “Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives? The very idea is repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship” (Stein, 2010, p. 30). This helped set the groundwork for when other cases were brought up to the courts. Why is this court important to changing of urban sexualities in the 1960s? It is important because it provided women with the right to decide if they wanted to take contraceptive with worrying…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Australian Christian Lobby 2012, ‘Submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee Concerning the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill’ 2010, Australian Christian Lobby, retrieved 27th April 2014, < http://www.acl.org.au/>…

    • 1974 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    These three Supreme Court cases have tested the Catholic Church’s teachings on the topics of abortion, same-sex marriage, and contraception. In this modern era, the Catholic faith is being tested more and more, and the Church is going through many trials and tribulations, because “all who desire to live a godly life in…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real issue to me seems to be what the law is to be interpreted as. It seems that if we follow…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    It prevents the government from recognizing same-sex couples as married in the eyes of the law, even if their marriage is legal and recognized in the state they live in.…

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    “That at about 2:50 o’clock in the morning of February 6, 2010, at Barangay Magurang, Municipality of Polangui, Province of Albay, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, with intent to violate the law, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and knowingly bear, carry and possess a deadly weapon (balisong) in a public place, without the necessary permit and authority from the COMELEC to possess and carry the same within the election period, to the damage and prejudice of the public interest.”…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Estrada vs Sandiganbayan

    • 3252 Words
    • 14 Pages

    That on or about 04 February 2000, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in the City of Manila, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, being then President of the Republic of the Philippines, without having been duly authorized, judicially or administratively, taking advantage of his position and committing the offense in relation to office, i.e., in order to CONCEAL THE ill-gotten wealth HE ACQUIRED during his tenure and his true identity as THE President of the Republic of the Philippines, did…

    • 3252 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appellee's Brief

    • 3538 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Plaintiff-appellee PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General in answer to the allegations raised by the accused-appellant in his Brief, respectfully states:…

    • 3538 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It should be remembered that the Philippine Constitution, while inexorably committed towards the protection of the working class from exploitation and unfair treatment, nevertheless mandates the policy of social justice so as to strike a balance between an avowed predilection for labor, on the one hand, and the maintenance of legal rights of capital, the proverbial hen that lays the golden egg, on the other. Indeed, we should not be unmindful of the legal norm that justice is in every case for the deserving, to be dispensed with in light of established facts, the applicable law, and existing jurisprudence.”…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gayly's Docs

    • 21137 Words
    • 85 Pages

    These are consolidated petitions for the writs of prohibition and certiorari to enjoin petitioners’ prosecution for Rebellion and to set aside the rulings of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Regional Trial Court of Makati City (RTC Makati) on the investigation and prosecution of petitioners’ cases.…

    • 21137 Words
    • 85 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rh Bill Article

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MANILA, Philippines–A Catholic Church official on Friday defended its continued opposition to the reproductive health law, adding that the Church only wanted the public to be aware of its potential “dangers.”…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti RH BILL

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Surely, the proposed law spreads around nice words such as responsibility, healthcare, freedom, choice, development, rights, equality, couples, etc. Yet, it is nothing but an attempt to remove God from our government and society. When I told a friend that lines, he answered: “grabe naman kasi kayo, masyado kayong overreacting, masyado nyong ginagawang literal ang mga sciptures. sa sobrang pagkaliteral, yung mga sentiments na rinerelease nila, wala na sa lugar… hindi naman sa masyado kong crinicriticize pero you’re going beyond limits… kung walang RH Bill, kaya bang pakainin ng simbahan lahat ng mga batang dadagdag sa listahan ng mahihirap sa buong Pilipinas? kaya ba nilang ipagamot? kaya nilang pag-aralin, as in lahat?” Yeah, I know. It’s really hard to reply to that, lalo na at opinyon nya yun. I just ask him, “don’t you think the bill will legalized abortion?” “Finance everyone’s freedom to have sex responsibility. We can support RH Bill and implements parental responsibility and still be a good Catholic,” he answered callously. When it comes to this part, we started to have different views toward it. And it is always a constant reminder that, we should read first the entire proposed bill before giving reactions. As for my own opinion, not because I’m Catholic or because of what the scriptures tell us, I really can’t accept the part wherein they give free condoms (to high school students) to those out of wedlock. “There’s only two words much better than condom and pills for you (esp. the teens today) it’s called wedding ring. All of us for sure are pro-life! Maybe some can’t because of poverty and great responsibility. Come to think of it, the bill cannot be pro-life because of many sections in the bill that promote harm than health, promote injustice rather that a greater good, and do not respect the solemn union of spouses in marriage. I just realized that being an anti means PRO-QUALITY LIFE. No, I’m…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rh Bill

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    is a Philippine bill aiming to guarantee universal access to methods and information on birth control and maternal care. While there is general agreement about its provisions on maternal and child health, there is great debate on its key proposal that the Filipino taxpayer and the private sector will fund and undertake widespread distribution of family planning devices furthermore, 81% Filipinos are Catholics, the Catholic Church exerts a strong influence in public life. Its staunch of opposition to the bill has drawn the ire of non-Catholics and Catholics alike who support the bill, and they invoke the principle of separation of church and state to stop the church. Passage or non-passage of the bill has negative implications depending on the…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    digest

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On November 11, 2009, after admitting the petitioner’s evidence, the COMELEC (2nd Division) dismissed the Petition on moral grounds that petitioner tolerates immorality which offends religious beliefs, and advocates sexual immorality. Petitioner should likewise be denied accreditation not only for advocating immoral doctrines but likewise for not being truthful when it said that it or any of its nominees/party-list representatives have not violated or failed to comply with laws, rules, or regulations relating to the elections.´ Furthermore, states COMELEC, Ang Ladlad will be exposing our youth to an environment that does not conform to the teachings of our faith.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But the other side declares different. According to them, not only that the bill puts a stopper in conceiving naturally, but it also degrades the moral values and culture of the society. Perhaps the most pronounced supporters are the members of the religious sectors. Still, according to them, the bill is a device mainly to ideologically attack on human life, the family, and our social and cultural values. Though this is only proclaimed by a group of people who values mostly religion, and many a conservative Filipino agrees with it.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays