Preview

Rgis Lawsuit

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
544 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rgis Lawsuit
The company in my state that was involved in a lawsuit is RGIS. Some of the factors related to this case is not being paid for transportation to and from inventory sites, time spent waiting to start inventory, and not given itemized wage statements. RGIS is an inventory chain who is guided by a set of core values that helped them grow from a small, regional operation to a global leader serving many of the largest companies on the planet. It was founded by Thomas Nicholson in 1958 and I worked from them for four years.
RGIS to date still denies any wrong doing. RGIS is claimed to have violated the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and the wage and hour laws. They had failed to properly pay all wages and overtime compensation to its employees. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of the many thousands of current and former
RGIS auditors threw out the United States. The goal of the lawsuit was said to make RGIS compensate us for all hours’ worked and future violations to come by them. This lawsuit began in 2000 and has been on going to as late as 2011. Due to the negligence and ineffective procedures of RGIS the courts ruled in the favor of the claimants. As a result RGIS was set to pay out over $27 million in damages as of July 2011. As we all know the lawyers in this case got the bulk of the money, but I did receive a fair share for what I had been thru. Although there is no way to prevent every occurrence in the workplace, there is numerous things management can do to lessen the frequency of this destructive or pervasive behavior. The management of RGIS could have better mitigated the risk of this type of lawsuit by having better transportation pay and compensation in place. I really don’t think there is much to be done in this case right now. The only thing that could be done wasn’t done in the beginning. I believe if they only took the time to listen, and then react they would’ve had a better outcome. You would think

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As a direct and proximate cause of the negligent acts of Defendant Anheuser-Busch or its employees as set forth above, Plaintiff has incurred the following expenses for medical care and attention:…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A whistle blower contacted the City’s Office of Employee Relations (OER) and filed a complaint to the OER Director about two DOT Engineering Technicians, Tom Newton and Wayne Jones. His report stated that Newton and Jones lied about the use of overtime on their timesheets and also falsified…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Affymax, Inc. Case

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page

    The defendants in the case is Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson is headquartered in New Jersey and operates in multiple foreign countries.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written Assignment 2

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rossi Inc. is a diversified manufacturer of industrial products. In 2008, Rossi updated its asbestos litigation liability, including the costs of settlement payments and defense costs relating to currently pending claims and future claims projected to be filed against the Company through 2017 for losses incurred to date. Before 2008, the Company’s previous estimate was for claims projected to be filed through 2011. As part of the 2008 update to the asbestos litigation liability, Rossi engaged Thompson and Associates, a consulting firm, to serve as an external specialist to estimate the claims liability for December 31, 2008. As a result of the 2008 update and the external specialist claims estimate, the Company significantly increased its recorded asbestos litigation liability by $586 million, arriving at a total liability estimate of $1,055 million as of December 31, 2008. During 2009, additional payments against the reserve reduced the recorded liability to $962 million. As of December 31, 2009, the Company performed an analysis of the asbestos litigation reserve and determined that the asbestos litigation liability should remain at $962 million. In 2009, Rossi Inc.’s average cost per claim litigation increased from $29,000 in 2008, to $34,000 due to management’s aggressive approach. This resulted in Thompson concluding that the litigation liability account should have a carrying value of $1,124 Million instead of $962 Million. Management of Rossi Inc. thinks that there aggressive approach to litigation claims in 2009 and revised defense strategy will decrease litigation cost and defense cost in the future.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    W Inc and your company have been engaged in litigation over a specific patent infringement matter.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    M International and W Inc. have been engaged in long-standing litigation over a specific patent infringement matter. Pertains to the accounting for this contingency loss, this memo has made the following conclusions:…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether Google was negligent in the act of knowingly allowing or aiding managed security service providers to commit fraud, violating consumer protection. In addition, whether Google should have prevented such activity, even if aware of it.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the course of the lawsuit Jan gets other attorneys in his Boston law firm to assist him. Jan spends lavishly for experts, but the length of the discovery process and opposing counsels’ maneuvers stretch all his assets to the limit. Jan concentrates his efforts against the parent company (Grace) since they had personal testimony of a former employee of Grace who had witnessed dumping. The case against Beatrice Foods was dismissed and would then lead the firm to accept settlement from Grace for $8 million.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Steve often purchases office supplies from Supplymax. a company with stores in many states, but none in Steve home state of Missouri. Supplymax does, however, maintain a distribution center in Kansas City. Missouri. Supplymax does not advertise in Missouri except that it places a few advertisements in national magazines. Some of which are sold in Missouri. Steve has an agreement with their store in Chicago. and Steve will often contact the Chicago store and have them hold items for him to pick up when he is on one of his frequent business trips to Chicago. Last year. Steve purchased eight chairs from Supplymax to use with his Conference table at his business. At a recent meeting with his local sales staff. One of the chairs collapsed injuring Steve. Steve has sued Supplyimax in state court in his hometown of St Louis. Supplymax does not want to have this case heard in Si. Louis. Or anywhere in Missouri for that matter. But if it must be in Missouri. Supplymax demands that the case be heard in Kansas City. Discuss the issues and likely outcome of his situation.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Cregger confirmed that the claimant, Mr. Juan Santana-Cortez was employed full time with the company on January 22, 2015, when he was hired as a Shop Helper. He claimed that Mr. Cortez was a problematic employee because he had demonstrated a rebellious attitude towards management, by not doing what told to do. However, from what he knows of Mr. Cortez, is that he did not have any problems or issues with his coworkers whom he worked with inside the manufacturing plant.…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12 June 2003,…

    • 6716 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: Was there Employer-Employee Relationship between the petitioners and individual watchmen of the MSA who are alleged to be members of the Respondent Union.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Group Thinking

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

     This case deals with a civilian worker at a large air-force base who was…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sample Case Analysis

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The decision was based on the following violation analysis and the possible actual damages that the company may incur should we pursue the case in Court:…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays