Preview

rfgdf

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
360 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
rfgdf
Constitutional Convention Biography Basic Information
Name of Conventioneer John Dickenson

Birth/Death Nov. 8, 1732/Feb 14 , 1808

State Represented Delaware

Age at Convention 54

Background
Marital Status

Current Job Retired merchant and lawyer

Number of Children
1
Economic Class

Highest Level of Education

Religion Anglican/ Episcopalian ( associated Quakers)

Political Beliefs
Features of the Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, & the Great Compromise He supported the New Jersey plan because Delaware is a smaller state. He thought that the compromise between the Virginia and the New Jersey plan was a very good idea. He thought it was a good compromise because although the amount of seats each state gets in the house of representatives is based on population, the senate had only two seats no matter what state.

The Necessary and Proper Clause John Dickinson (DE) thought “aid and comfort” neither necessary nor proper, and vague. John Dickinson (DE) agreed that treason against a State was likewise treason against the US, but a clear definition was required.

The Slave Trade He had slaves but he treated them nicely until the Quakers said that slavery was bad, and then since john was a Quaker he freed all his slaves. So he did not like it. John Dickinson did not condone the beating of slaves to keep them malleable. He primarily used his slaves for agricultural work. He inherited his slave from his father.

Electoral College and the Presidency

Judicial Review and Judicial Powers Dickinson was for separation of powers. He wanted separation of powers because he was for the whole Constitution in general. Separation of powers is very similar to federalism except for it separates the powers between the three branches.

Notable Quotes/Picture: “We cannot be happy, without being free that we cannot be free, without being secure in our property, that we cannot be secure in our property, if without consent, other may, as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine our beloved nation, that we fought tirelessly to defend from the tyrant king of England. Just to be split like an axe dividing a piece of wood. The conflict between the larger and southern states will grow into much more than just a debate. The Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan will not work and be productive. The Great Compromise will let the nation thrive because it critiques both plans and let’s the north and south work together. Let me explain why James Madison’s plan will not work.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Connecticut Compromise: The Connecticut Compromise played a huge part in the adoption of the Constitution. The Virginia Plan had already establishedthat there were three branches of government, but the Connecticut Copromise made the Legislative branch bicameral. It now consisted of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The problem was that the smaller states thought their interests and concerns would not be recognized and the lager states wanted to dominate. So, the decision was made to make two seperate representative governments. The House of Representatives, which had the representatives based on population, and the Senate, which had each state represented equally. The New Jersey Plan was the plan that decided that instead of only one representative from each state in the Senate, there should be two.…

    • 295 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown's Raid DBQ

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many different views and ideas about John Brown flew around the North before the Civil War. Debates and arguments sprung up about whether Brown’s actions and means could or should be justified. Some agreed only partially with Brown. Document A proves that with Horace Greeley’s statement “And, while we heartily wish every slave in the world would run away from his master tomorrow and never be retaken, we should not feel justified in entering a slave state to incite them to do so, even if we were sure to succeed in the enterprise.” Greeley is merely saying that he approves of Browns means but not his violent way of going about accomplishing those means.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of these is the Virginia Plan, also called the Large State Plan, which advised that the representation in a bicameral legislature be proportional to property or population. The other is the New Jersey Plan, which called for equal representation for all states regardless to population in a unicameral legislature. Had the Virginia Plan been adopted entirely, large states would always have a dominant voice over the smaller states. On the other hand, if the New Jersey plan had been adopted entirely, bigger states with bigger needs would never prevail. When the delegates began to discuss this issue, they willingly agreed that a bicameral legislature is necessary for the new national government. They differed widely, however, in the representation of the two houses. Bitter debates followed until, finally, the compromise of equal representation in the House and proportional representation in the Senate was reached. In Henry Steele Commager 's article, "The Constitution, Was It an Economic Document?", he remarked that the framers "feared the powers of the majority, as they feared all power unless controlled" (141); the compromise of the representation of the houses underscores exactly this point because it prevents an absolute body majority which would prove to be fatal to the country had they had a malevolent intent. Furthermore, the compromise effectively appealed to all states and therefore…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no on else; hence the exercise of the natural right of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is know as the Philadelphia Convention, in which Federalist and Antifederalist debated the laws that were to be written in the constitution. The arguments at this convention, proved just how divided the states were. For instance, Mr. Sherman from Connecticut, argued that the House of Representatives should not be elected by the people, but instead they should be elevated by the state's legislature, since he believed many citizens were uneducated. But, Mr. Mason from Virginia argued that instead of the legislature, the democratic principle was to allow an election of branch by the people, agreeing with Mr. Wilson, from Pennsylvania's statement that, “No government could long subsist without the confidence of the people.” (The Confederation and the Constitution, 166). Many states alongside Connecticut agreed that citizens shouldn’t have the right to appoint people into the House of Representatives, but American citizens who are registered voters have the right to vote for their…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A compromise that was made was the Great Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement that small and large states made. This compromise stated the representation and legislative structure each state should have under the U.S. Constitution. The outcome of the Great Compromise was that each state would have two representatives in the upper house.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The agenda of this convention started out with a draft that was presented by James Madison and his colleagues. This draft became known as the “Virginia Plan”. In this plan it was proposed that they scrape the articles of confederation in favor of a central government. Within this plan the power of each state would be reduced and the federal government would increase its power and control. Along with this draft another provision was introduced that caused quite a stir within the smaller populated states. A bicameral legislature with all seats portioned by population was proposed. Allowing this Senate to lead all foreign affairs, assemble a council of revisions that would have the power to veto both national and state legislation. James Madison, the “Distracting Question” in Philadelphia (1787). Faragher, Buhle, Czitrom & Armitage, (2009, p. 185)…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first three articles describe each branch and what each branch is made out of. (Doc B) The federal government was split into three and that was called the seperation of powers. Since all the power isn’t just in one branch, the seperation of powers guard against tyranny. As stated by James Madision “ The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executie, and judiciary, in the same hands whether of one, a few, or many.”…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Men being...by nature, all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent."…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The complication with the Virginia Plan is that not all states have the same population; therefore, smaller states could easily become overruled by larger states with a dense population. William Paterson, of New Jersey, debated this issue between the large and small states which is known as the New Jersey Plan. James Madison and William Paterson came to an agreement that agreed to both sides of their plans. This agreement became known as the Great Compromise which allowed all states to be represented equally in the Senate and in the House of Representatives.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Checks And Balances

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The principle of separation of powers, as implemented in drafting the Constitution, was based on several values generally held: the separation of government into three branches, legislative, executive, and judicial; the idea that each branch performs its own unique and identifiable functions that are appropriate to each; and the limitation of the personnel of each branch to that branch, so that no one person or group should be able to serve in more than one branch simultaneously. Since the judicial, executive, and legislative branch of the government all held power, the framers began to develop a system of checks and balances to guarantee that governmental power would not be conducted in an abusive manner. However, the constitution went much further than the mere separation of powers. It also established an elaborate system of checks and balances. The framers believed that in order to steer clear of a monarchy such as the one they had been used to under Britain’s rule, they would have to come up with a system of checks and balances which still prevails to this day. By implementating this system of checks and balances, they…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 1783, there would be increasing economic and financial issues that would be best solved by a stronger federal government. There was therefore a call to decide on how to deal with the rising issue of federal vs state power in the constitution. The Virginia Plan, drawn up by James Madison (a southerner) called for two separate houses and for the representation to be determined by population and for the central government to be able to step in and veto state legislatures in necessary. However a northerner, William Patterson, came up with the New Jersey Plan which called for a single house with just the one vote per state and that state sovereignty be preserved. Both sides had their downfalls. If you went with Madison’s idea, then the big three states combined would control over…

    • 1003 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the altercations was between the large and small states. They argued about representation and how they should be represented. James Madison a key player in creating the constitution proposed the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan proposed a bicameral legislative with membership based upon each states population. Many big states like New York, and Virginia supported this plan. William Paterson proposed the New Jersey Plan which was supported by many of the small states. The New Jersey plan proposed a unicameral where each state had one vote.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “unhappiness could well be found by focusing alone on the expectations of citizens and seeking to discern their legal legitimacy or otherwise ”…

    • 2963 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays