Preview

Review: The Controlled Scientific Experiment Carried Out In The Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
661 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Review: The Controlled Scientific Experiment Carried Out In The Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
Review
1.) The controlled scientific experiment carried out in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
2.) Science is an effort to explain how the physical world works by making observations and measurements, and carrying out experiments. It is based on the assumption that events in the physical world follow orderly cause-and-effect patterns that we can understand.
Carrying out experiments involves the scientific process. The first step in the scientific process is identifying the problem. There must be a problem worth studying in order for the scientific process to be needed. The second step is to find out what is known about the problem in order to conduct a correct and relevant experiment. The third step is to develop a question for the experiment to be based off of. The entire point of
…show more content…
A model is an approximate representation or simulation of a system.
A scientific hypothesis is a possible explanation of what scientists observe in nature or in the results of their experiment. A scientific theory is a well-tested and widely accepted scientific hypothesis. The Scientific Law (Law of Nature) is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes some aspect of the universe.
Peer review involves scientists openly publishing details of the models and methods they used, the results of their experiments, and the reasoning behind their hypothesis for other scientists in their field (their peers) to evaluate. Its important because scientific knowledge advances in this way, with scientists continually questioning the measurements and data produced by their peers.
Scientific theories are not to be taken lightly because they are tested widely, supported by extensive evidence, and are accepted as being useful explanations used by most scientists. The term “theory” is often used incorrectly because they do not understand how rigorously scientific theories are tested before they become widely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this society today, science is a method of discovering how things will impact what will happen in our future. However, scientific discovery is getting the correct information through a process or steps. It also is the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena (free dictionary). Science is expanding the knowledge of the world around us to make sure that the knowledge of science is available.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Biology 108 Worksheet

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Define science – Science is the development of concepts about the natural world , often by using the scientific method…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hummanities 3991

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When we talk about science, many people hear the term “theory”. The definition of a scientific theory can become confusing since many people interpret the meaning differently. When a person uses the term “theory” in a sentence it is usually used in a non-scientific way. They assume that a theory is something assumed, but not proven. When the term “theory” is used in science, it means an explanation based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. It has been tested and confirmed as a general principle to explain phenomena. A scientific theory must be based on careful examination of facts. “A theory is a hypothesis or set of hypotheses that has stood the test and (so far, at least) has not been contradicted by evidence” (Suplee 9).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories resulting from Scientific and Observation & Measurement done by yourself or one group needs to be validated by further study. Reproducing of the scientific method to test the theory again and again gains confidence that the theory is correct, but still may have flaws because the test conditions may be too narrow validate the theory. Therefore testing by others by collaboration with others can help to add more viewpoints on the theory and others who collaborate may run scientific method at other locations and with other conditions to further confirm and/or refine the theory. Peer review allows for others within the scientific community to consider the theory and find flaws or suggest other testing or refinements that are necessary. Peer review may also lead to collaboration with scientist who can run additional testing and may have access to more resources for testing (better equipment, more manpower, research funding, etc).…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    As too often occurs in such debates, each side is quick to dismiss the assertions of the other as fantasy, and imply that the sensible and reasonable person should not engage in non-productive contention with such headstrong opposition. When dismantling the arguments from each side, it becomes apparent that the most heated points of controversy often boil down to a matter of semantics. The scientific use of the term “theory” is quite different from the use of the word in general conversation. A scientific theory is a structured argument used to explain why things occur the way they do in the physical world, based on tested, measurable scientific evidence. A hypothesis, on the other hand, is an assertion about something (a speculative guess) that a scientist expects to be supported by future scientific finding.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    A scientific theory is broader in scope and explains more events that a law. After hypotheses and laws have been tested many times, with accurate results, they become theories.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    your inner fish

    • 3496 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Scientific explanations begin with a hypothesis, ending with experiments that are performed to support the hypothesis made. This can then become a theory. Other ways of knowledge, on the other hand, don’t need to be tested to be true; we just know that they are true.…

    • 3496 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientists use the scientific method primarily to gain knowledge about the nature of reality. Due to the means of the scientific method, the structure of the atom and the composition of the stars, the mechanisms for growth, the cause of disease and cures or infection, and also the blueprint for life have all been discovered. The scientific method has many great functions that all evolve from the inquiry of a problem (steps: Observe, Create Hypotheses, Deduce specific things that may also be true, Test the hypothesis), leading to a hypothesis that is then broken down to help distinguish relevant information from irrelevant information within the scientific problem.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the scientific method

    • 2341 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Biology is the study of the phenomena of life, and biologists observe living systems and organisms, ask questions, and propose explanations for those observations. Science assumes that biological systems are understandable and can be explained by fundamental rules or laws. Scientific investigations share some common elements and procedures, which are referred to as the scientific method. Not all scientists follow these procedures in a strict fashion, but each of the elements is usually present. Science is a creative human endeavor that involves asking questions, making observations, developing explanatory hypotheses, and testing those hypotheses. Scientists closely scrutinize investigations in their field, and each scientist must present his or her work at scientific meetings or in professional publications, providing evidence from observations and experiments that supports the scientist’s explanations of biological phenomena.…

    • 2341 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Watson stated in "The Value of Theories", a scientific theory is a systematic explanation that unifies various observed phenomena and facts. Based on observations we make, science operates under theories which are constantly revised and checked by experiment. A scientific theory also possesses many vital qualities for true understanding.…

    • 643 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scientific Method

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages

    Learning Goal: To understand how the scientific method can be used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method is a procedure used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method consists of making observations, formulating hypotheses, designing and carrying out experiments, and repeating this cycle. Observations can be either quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative observations are measurements consisting of both numbers and units, such as the observation that ice melts at . In contrast, qualitative observations are observations that do not rely on numbers or units, such as the observation that water is clear. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation of the observations. The hypothesis is not necessarily correct, but it puts the scientist's understanding of the observations into a form that can be tested through experimentation. Experiments are then performed to test the validity of the hypothesis. Experiments are observations preferably made under conditions in which the variable of interest is clearly distinguishable from any others. If the experiment shows that the hypothesis is incorrect, the hypothesis can be modified, and further experiments can be carried out to test the modified hypothesis. This cycle is repeated, continually refining the hypothesis. If a large set of observations follow a reproducible pattern, this pattern can be summarized in a law—a verbal or mathematical generalization of a phenomenon. For example, over the years people observed that every morning the sun rises in the east, and every night the sun sets in the west. These observations can be described in a law stating, "The sun always rises in the east and sets in the west." After a great deal of refinement, a hypothesis can lead to a theory. A theory is an explanation of why something happens. For example, Newton's theory of gravitation explains why objects tend to fall toward the Earth (as well as explaining the interactions between the Earth and the other…

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A scientist would initially observe and classify data. He would proceed to look for pattern in the data and formulate a hypothesis. Following this, the scientist would make a predication. The scientist would test this predictions through experiments. If the experimental results confirm the hypothesis, a scientific law has been discovered. The scientific method limits the influence of bias and prejudice in the experimenter. It provides an objective, standardized approach to conducting an experiment and, in doing…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peer-review process is considered critical to establishing a reliable body of research and knowledge. Scholars can be expert only in a limited area of their fields; they rely upon peer-reviewed journals to provide reliable, credible research upon which they can build subsequent, related research.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science - a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanation and prediction about the world.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics