Preview

Research Paper On The Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research Paper On The Boston Massacre
On March 5, 1770 a specific event took place that had impacted many lives. This event is known as the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre was considered to be a street fight that took place when a mob started to throw snowballs, stones and sticks at a squad of British soldiers. In the end, five colonists resulted in death. This was caused by the developing tensions in the American colonies that had been growing ever since the Royal troops had first appeared. I believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of self-defense. I say this because, the British soldiers’ lives were under threat and had to use equal force. In addition, a massacre is when many are killed and it consists of an innocent/defenseless side. In the Boston Massacre, both sides were not defenseless. This was not murder either because, this event was not planned or was meant to happen. The British soldiers weren’t intending to kill these colonists. Lastly, manslaughter wouldn’t be reasonable because, the British soldiers killed these colonists in act of defense/protection.
Self-Defense means the defense of one's person or interests, especially through the use of physical force. Self-Defense involves when
…show more content…
I say this because, self-defense is the defense of one’s person or interests, especially through the use of physical force. What took place on March 5, 1770 is an example of self-defense. The British troops were under serious threat by a mob of colonists who were throwing various things and screaming threats at them. In result, the British troops acted by opening fire and ended up killing five colonists. This clearly shows that the British soldiers had to take action and defend themselves. This shooting was not planned and had only took place because of how the colonists behaved. There are endless reasons why this event was an act of self-defense rather than a massacre, murder or manslaughter. Boston Massacre? More like Boston

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A person's right to self defense begins at the moment the person reasonably believes that he or she is facing deadly force and reasonably…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Life of John Adams

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1770 Adams agreed to represent the British soldiers on trial for killing five civilians in what became known as the Boston Massacre. He justified defending the soldiers on the grounds that the facts of a…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A sobering fact is that our government has a monopoly on the use of force, but it cannot protect everyone at all times in an immediate fashion. Joel Samaha, Criminal Law, at 155 (11th ed. 2014). Therefore, citizens are permitted to use proportional force in a “self-help” fashion as long as 1. The necessity is great 2. The need exists “right now” 3. The force is used for prevention only. Id, at 155. However, preemptive strikes or retaliation are not justifications for force used in self-defense. Id, at 155. There are also four elements of self-defense: unprovoked attack, necessity, proportionality, and reasonable belief. Id, at 156. The first three were alluded to earlier and are fairly self-explanatory, but reasonable belief will be the primary focus in this discussion. This element requires that a defender must have the “reasonable” belief that it’s necessary to use deadly force to neutralize an imminent deadly attack. Id, at 156. However, what is “reasonable fear?” How does it play out in the courtroom? Is the burden on the person using force against an aggressor to show that he or she possessed “reasonable fear?” Does this requirement change whether a person is at home or walking on the sidewalk? Should we presume “reasonable fear” at times or should be look into whether the person using deadly force had a “reasonable” opportunity to retreat and avoid violence? Should we offer civil immunity to those who used deadly force legitimately? Overall, are the recently more aggressive self-defense laws good for public policy? Do they allow those with “itchy” trigger fingers to have a virtual license to kill, or do they take an extra necessary step to put the safety of law-abiding citizens ahead of the concerns of violent law-breakers? Newer self-defense laws, such as the one passed by Florida,…

    • 4220 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Self-Defense Law

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self-defense laws, also known as “stand your ground laws”, have been a significant aspect of many court cases. However, like most other laws, these laws can be used improperly and cause excess controversy around a case. Joe Palazzolo and Rob Barry’s article titled “More Killings Called Self-Defense” from the March 31st edition of Wall Street Journal brings attention to these self-defense laws. The case discussed in the article is an example of self-defense laws causing controversy, as many protestors believe these laws were used improperly. This is also a common issue as the number of justifiable homicides seems to be on the rise. Are these “stand your ground laws” truly being abused? This is the main issue causing the debate surrounding cases around the country.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When is it acceptable to protect yourself? Is it when you're nearly beaten to death? Or a more suitable question would be does self defense only apply to certain individuals? Self defense is one of the biggest motives that individuals acclaim to while undergoing criminal court cases. This law specifically states that you are entitled to defend yourself when someone provokes you or pursue you in a violent manner. Although I am favorable of this law, I passionately disagree with certain circumstances where this law has been scene as obscure.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, the amount of people who actually use this law for its purpose is microscopically small! You could say that pretty much no one uses guns for self defense, and is actually quite the contrary. They use it to harm others, instead of defending themselves against others. According to Carimah Townes from thinkprogress.org, “[The amount of people] between…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carry Guns In Schools

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A common ideal for a person, is to protect his/her self, and their family, but with guns being affiliated with crime ranging from muggings, all the way to murder. Guns are capable to kill with ease, for some people, they choose to carry guns protect themselves against the guns. Even though people may see the people carrying guns for self defense as another threat with a gun, most of the people carrying guns don’t use the gun. But there have been cases of people that had to use their concealed gun they were carrying to protect themselves. One example of a person using their gun for self defense, is…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Understanding the law is very important when assessing the use of force for personal protection. In the case of People v. McManus it was stated that “Defense of oneself or one 's relations, deemed a natural, inalienable right at common law, justified the use of force, making even homicide lawful” (People, 1986). If one is unsure of the local law in relation to force they should leave it to the authorities. Self-defense of one’s self against an attack…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to be protected by the geneva convention as a POW you have to wear uniforms – they allow us to disciriminate between civilians and non-civilians…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self defense is defined as the defense of one’s person or interests, through the use of physical force which is allowed in certain situations as an…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1991, ‘Self Defence’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.20, No.4, (Autumn, 1991), pp. 283-302…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self Defense Essay

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The primary goal of self-defense is to avoid becoming the victim of violence. The best way to do this is not to be where violence is likely to occur. For example, if you visit dangerous neighborhoods at night frequent places where drunken men gather, you are running some obvious risks. I know avoiding dangerous people and dangerous places is now always possible, but keep in mind that it is your first and best line of defense.…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. Confusion of Absolute Statement – this fallacy is committed when one argues from the truth of a general principle to the truth of specific case. The specific case may even be an exception the general law. Let us keep in mind, there are always exeptions to general principles. A universal principle is coined in view of normal and ordinary circumstances. But there may be exceptional conditions where the force of universal principle may be waived.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Take Away Their Guns

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The available evidence supports the claim that self-defense is a legitimate form of deterrence. People who report to the National Crime Survey that they defended themselves with a weapon were less likely to lose property in a robbery or be injured in an assault than those who did not defend themselves. Statistics have shown that would-be burglars are threatened by gun-wielding victims about as many times a year as they are arrested (and much more often…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays