Preview

Rene Descartes Argument On The Power Of Knowledge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Argument On The Power Of Knowledge
When I woke up I was very confused as to what was happening, where I was, and who I am. As I grasped an understanding of what Gandalf was saying, I realized that I had the power of knowledge to prove to Gandalf and Bilbo that I do exist, and that I am certain I know who I really am. Knowledge is possible because it is based on self-evident and absolutely certain principles. Sense experience cannot provide the certainty needed to guarantee that what we claim to know is true. Like Plato and Democritus argued, we are like mathematicians, we have to rely on reason as the basis for determining whether our opinions are justified true beliefs otherwise known as knowledge.
Plato has more of an idealistic viewpoint. He knows that the ascent to knowledge
…show more content…
Memory allows us to remember something that we knew in the past, even, if we no longer remember the original sense. It is transmitted from one individual to another, which brings about justification and truth that we do exist and know what we know. However, the idea of skepticism is an important aspect to remember as I show Gandalf that I know I exist. In Rene Descartes first meditation he claims, that the senses often deceive us and our perceptions can often be inaccurate. “But while my senses may deceive me about what is small or far away, these may still be other things that I take in by the senses but that I cannot possibly doubt-like that I am here, sitting before the fire, wearing a dressing gown, touching this paper.” Therefore I know that it is up to me to distinguish what I know is true and untrue, what is trustworthy and what is deceiving. I know I exist because I am able to reason and distinguish between pleasant and painful sensations. In Descartes meditations he illustrates theses sensations that I know I experience. “I sensed hunger, thirst, and other such desires-and also bodily inclinations towards cheerfulness, sadness, and other emotions. Outside me, I sensed, not just extension, shape, and motion, but also hardness, and other qualities detected by touch.” I am also able to reason that God exists. God is a perfect being and he would not allow us to be deceived. Knowledge based on the senses rests on the foundation of reason that allows us to believe that God exists and he would not allow us to be deceived because he gave me a clear and distinctive perception. I can also reason that my memory can dispel any doubt that I had because I know what I have experienced, if I were dreaming my memory would be disconnected and in random order, this would make it hard to remember many details about everything that has happened to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Meno, Plato explores the relationship between knowledge and true opinion. For instance, Plato states, “As long as he has the right opinion about that of which the other has knowledge, he will not be a worse guide than the one who knows, as he has a…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understands that only a person how has gotten the idea of good can get the best knowledge since the idea of good is the best of the virtues possible, and he also understands that only the people who have gotten the idea of good and thus the best…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3) If we can’t be certain that what we sense is real, we can’t acquire knowledge through sense experience.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with Plato's objections stated above, however not to the degree where what is…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1988 T. Berry Brazelton wrote a bestselling book called, “What Every Baby Knows.” If Plato were to examine this, he would assert that babies know much more then what the majority believes to be true today. Plato believes that Knowledge is not educated, but something that is inherent in us at birth. To come to this conclusion Plato had to first gain an understanding of what truth and reality actually are.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believes that education is the surest way to an ideal society. In today’s society education is atopic brought up in debates quite frequently because it is important that the youth are educated so they can fill in jobs and run the country when they are older. This does not mean everyone gets an education, for there are many countries where education can not be afforded or is not the best. Yet in today’s school system students are not treated for their full potential.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In rationalism, reasoning and understanding is more important than the senses to the establishment of knowledge. Sense experience is an incoming visual, aural, touch,…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates tells the story of prisoners in a cave who were chained up from head to toe and couldn’t even turn their heads. Behind them was a fire and between the fire and them were showmen with puppets casting shadows. The shadows were everything to the prisoners, it was their reality. One day one of the prisoners was able to release himself from the chains and discovered where the shadows came from. Astounded by this reality, he continued walking towards another light shining, and discovered another world outside the cave. Feeling pity for the other prisoners, he went back to tell them about the world outside the cave. Instead of asking about this other world, the prisoners were enraged and threatened to kill the unchained prisoner. This story serves as a metaphor for the state of ignorance, its saying most people live in the world of shadows (Allegory of Cave, Plato). Plato believes knowledge is always better than ignorance. I agree with him. Its always better to know something than to not know anything, for example, if I was diagnosed with a mortal illness, I would want to know. I would hate to spend my last years or months of life doing things that make me unhappy. Knowing that I was going to die would make me appreciate things more. I would quit working, and go on a vacation. Even when the situation isn’t as bad as this one, its always better to know. After taking a test I’m always really anxious about knowing how I did on it. Even if I failed the test, I prefer knowing than wondering and feeling anxious about it all the…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In platos republic, book VI, platos tells the story of Allegory of the cave. This story tells of what plato believes true education is. First plato tells what education is not. “Education isn’t what some people declare it to be, namly, putting knowledge into souls that lack it, like putting sight into blind eyes”(518b) then plato describes what he thinks education is. “Then education is the craft concerned with doing this very thing, this turning around, and with how the soul can most easily and effectively be made to do it. It isn’t the craft of putting sight into the soul. Education takes for granted that sight is there but that it isn’t turned the right way or looking where it ought to look, and it tries to redirect…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Republic, Plato expresses that knowledge is something gained by a learning experience and also that you are required to rationalize and think-through the teachings you come across to truly apprehend something. On page 177 it is written, “… the virtue of reason seems to belong above all to something more divine, which never loses its power but is either useful and beneficial or useful and harmful, depending on the way it is turned.” (518e). Although it is known that knowledge is not easy to obtain, it truly depends on the “way that you are turned,” or rather the way that you are taught equaling the amount of knowledge you possess through a given amount of time. Opposed to that idea is the writing in the Meno, which is where we are told that knowledge is not quite something that is learned, but that it is innate in all of us.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An external world skeptic would agree in that our senses are not reliable when making judgements, however its context usually refers to the close past and/or present: not the distant past. Complex reasoning alike gives the context to link past events or memories of them in finding a conclusion using judgement. Complex reason is completely reliant on the past. Rinard argues that skepticism about the past leads to denying complex reasoning which implies that the skeptic’s reasoning is illogical and flawed. A skeptic might respond with a memory’s accuracy and how documentation of said past events brings legitimacy which then leads the external world skeptic into a selective skeptic. However the same can be said about legitimizing memories by saying it was the work of the deceiver. The response of an evil deceiver can be used for all rebuttals since it has no limits of application to which it can be tied to and is purely circular in its…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes and Locke both agreed that there were things in life that exist that we can be certain of. For Descartes, human experiences did not provide sufficient proof of existence. He indicated that through his Dream Conjecture and his Evil-Demon Theory (Paquette 205). Descartes stated that we cannot be certain if reality is a dream or not, thus questioning our existence (Paquette 205). In his Evil-Demon Theory, Descartes claimed that for all he knew, an evil demon could be putting thoughts into his head, making him think that reality was true when it was in fact false (Paquette 205). Ultimately, all this thinking resulted in Descartes coming to the conclusion that the one thing we could be sure of existing is the mind (Newman 2010). This can be seen through his most famous quote, “I think therefore I am (Kaplan 2008).” Descartes claimed that since he was able to doubt and think using his mind, his mind must exist (Paquette 205).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is the first thing that Descartes knows to be true. He says, “What about thinking? Here I make my discovery: thought exists; it alone cannot be separated from me. I am; I exist- this is certain” (Descartes, 19). He goes on to say that his senses are deceptive and whatever he may understand from his senses may be false, therefore he cannot rely on them.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    But, all of these sensory responses are purely physical. So, another explanation was needed in order to describe that which in not physical such as thoughts, emotion, pleasure, and pain. And the result of this was Descartes ' substance dualism theory. Because things such as pleasure, pain, thoughts, and emotion do not occur physically, but rather in the mind, his conclusion was that they are two separate things. His main reasoning for this is clearly stated when he says "I saw that while I could pretend that I had no body and that there was no world and no place for me to be in, I could not for all that pretend that I did not exist. I saw on the contrary that from the mere face that I thought of doubting the truth of other things, it followed quite evidently and certainly that I existed..." (Stevenson 86). In this, he explains that it was possible for him to doubt the existence of his body, without doubting his own existence as a thinking being. Therefore his existence as a thinking being must…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays