Reflective Essay: The Use Of Performance-Enhancing Drugs

To begin, in essay one and three they consist of text from multiple scholarly articles that convey their viewpoints on a certain topic that we chose ourselves. Throughout both essays, I incorporated each of the article’s points of view on the given subject, evidence supporting their views and then ended with analysis describing the effectiveness of each piece of evidence. In the first essay there were three outside sources that I integrated into my writing in order to oppose the given topic. In these articles, each author presented a different perspective as to why performance-enhancing drugs should not be allowed. As for my third essay there were three articles that I incorporated into my writing. However, for this essay we had to choose a topic and choose a side in which to argue, then research and find three peer reviewed articles to support the given side of the argument. The use of multiple articles in my essay possessing a
These essays focused on being able to persuade an audience to side for or against a specific topic of discussion. When implementing this tactic to my work, it was a very effective and beneficial way of solidifying my position, while at the same time gaining the readers confidence in my views pertaining to the topic. Therefore, when attempting to persuade the audience to think a certain way, the use of a Call-To-Action can provide support to a strong writer by concluding their argument in an effective manner. In my first essay, I chose to argue that performance –enhancing drugs should not be allowed. In regards to my third essay, I chose to argue that officers should be wearing police body cameras. Overall, the use of a Call-To-Action in both of these essays is a very useful persuasion technique and is necessary to complete your argument with extreme