Preview

Rational Choice Theory and Marxism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
391 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rational Choice Theory and Marxism
There are many ideas on how social order works and what must be done for social order to be achieved. I would like to examine two popular conflict theories rational choice and Marxism.
Rational choice theory is based upon utilitarianism where individuals try to maximize utility or benefits and minimize costs. In other words individuals choose their actions based upon how much it benefits them. According to Hobbes this self-interest leads to competitiveness amongst humans which needs to be governed. According to this theory must create laws and rules to be obeyed to maintain social order as individuals are at the center of all the power. However rational choice goes on to state that the natural human selfishness and competiveness is actually what is best for society economically and socially, i.e. the invisible hand and through the creation of specialization. A popular criticism for rational choice theory is that assumes rational thought for actions and neglects the existence for any other kinds of action. Furthermore rational choice theory assumes any phenomena in society can be explained by and is the cause of individual action instead of social structures.

While rationalist believe that individuals hold the power in society, Marxists believe that society is a complex system where individuals work together to work toward a common goal. Conflict comes in the form of social hierarchy where few hold the wealth and power in society (capitalist) but the working class demand equal amounts of power. In other words classes of people in the social hierarchy, not individuals, are the decision makers and power holders of a society. Marx believed that social order in every society is achieved through the production of economic goods. Those with the greatest production capabilities are the one who also dominant the market which causes a power struggle for social and economic resources. To overcome this struggle upper class and working class would have to work together as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational choice theory definition is the view that people behave as they do because they believe that performing their chosen actions has more benefits than costs. That is, people make rational choices based on their goals, and those choices govern their behavior. David Kwiatkowski, his risks was minimal at first because his co-workers and girlfriends were helping him get the drugs. But as time went on, David moved from place to place and with each different job he learned more about how the system worked. Then another factor is the fact is that he was not always alone in what he was doing. Meaning other co-workers was doing exactly what he was doing and they may not have known about each other but he was not only using his job to his benefit.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moving on to the theorists of rational choice, Cesare Beccaria, and Jeremy Bentham both were the initial theorists of rational choice theory. The premises for rational choice theory are free will versus determinism, cost and benefit, selfishness, waging war against each other, and social control. On page 15 of the text, Criminal Goes to the Movies, there’s a significant passage that illustrates the foundation of rational choice theory, leading to a social contract. “Beccaria began by assuming that…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is a useful conflict theory in helping us to understand why there was obedience, particularly in the past in society. Marx was seen as an economic determinist, as he believed that the functioning and running of society was based upon the economy. Because of this, Marx says that is why there was a divide between the proletariat (working class who have only their skills to sell) and the bourgeoisie (the ruling class who own the means of production). The bourgeoisie cannot operate without the proletariat, as they cannot produce products, and similarly the proletariat cannot operate without the bourgeoisie, as they need them so they can be paid a wage and feed their families. Therefore, even though the Bourgeoisie were exploiting the proletariat and the proletariat could have walked away to stop being exploited, they never walked away as they needed the money. On the other hand, this can be viewed from a different perspective. The reason why these people may have not left their jobs is because they could have been in a state of false consciousness, whereby they were unaware of their exploitation by the bourgeoisie. This helps us to understand society as the Marxism theory provides reasoning on how the bourgeoisie were able to exploit the proletariat, which in turn fuelled capitalism and allowed the ruling elite to maintain their profits. It is also relevant to today’s society, as it helps to explain why many people who are in a hard laboured, low paid job (e.g. Factory workers) do not leave, despite hating their job, and this is because they need the money to survive.…

    • 2098 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Scott J. (2000) "Understanding Contemporary Society - Theories of the Present: Chapter 9 - Rational choice theory", London: SAGE Publications Ltd.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that all humans were radical and that this directly influenced their organization of government. Similarly, to Locke, Marx classified society into two groups; The Bourgeois and The Proletarians. Marx believed that a ruling class was inevitable, “we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold of gradation of social ranks,” (Marx 9). All though, Marx sees no way to exist without social ranks, he also believes that in this case the bourgeois will join the proletarians in living a good life, “a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeoisie ideologists,” (Marx…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicy Theroy

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two main theorists, with the conflict theory; they are Karl Marx and Max Weber. Marx believed “that there are two basic groups of people within society – the wealthy and the poor.” (“Marx”) “Marx’s conflict theory seeks to study the inner-workings of struggle, why struggle occurs, and how the ruling class manages to hold onto their power during struggle.” (“Marx’s”) Virtually this means that the wealthy wanted to maintain their power with wealth, and the “working class” was to remain working never to better them.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict theory coined by Karl Marx suggests that suggested that social order is maintained by domination and power opposed to a shared consensus among society. This inequality is derived from social and political aspects established in society. Marxists believe that social in equalities are implemented by the bourgeoisie in order to maintain a disturbance among the proletariats in order to keep them distracted from existing economic issues. A way they do this through the media. They distract the public with celebrity’s lavish lifestyles and people are tied to the economy in an attempt to imitate them. Factualists would counter this perspective claiming that social inequalities benefit society positively. They believe that it works as an incentive for individuals to work harder and achieve their maximum potential. The education system also ensures that the most suitable are picked out for the job. It also ensures that social order is maintained as people would accept their position as they had an equal chance to everyone else. Factualists also believe that the individuals at the bottom of the fragmented social scale are needed as some has to do the…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While order theory posits that social solidarity exists through a hierarchy of occupations that rely upon each other to survive, conflict theory suggests that true social order is the destruction of the hierarchy (Marx et al., 1976; Stern & Axinn, 2011). Conflict theorists believe that hierarchies accomplish little except force everyone to compete for resources, ultimately ending in a massive economic downfall like the Great Depression (Russell, 2014). Conflict theorists envision a society free of capitalism. No amount of restructuring will make capitalism appealing to them. This is because, historically, any hint of capitalism has translated to a society that begins to base its values on these economic principles. The needs of citizens…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A major argument that Marx put across in his scripts was that capitalism would force society to polarise, causing two classes within society, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. These classes were at both extremes of the social spectrum, the bourgeoisie been the rich "fat cats" who reeped the fruits of capitalism, they were normally the factory or…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Selected Essays by Lefoko O. Molebatsi (2001) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Public Policy and Policy Analysis: The Rational Model Question: The rational model of public policy making, though heavily criticized, is the most widely used and or talked about model. Discuss why. By Lefoko O. Molebatsi (University of Botswana) Instructor: Prof G. S Maipose 2001…

    • 2813 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism shares in common with functionalism the macro structural approach to society, looking at it as a whole, however a key difference between the two theories is that marxism is a conflict perspective, that is the conflict of class between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat also known as the ruling and working classes. The work of Karl Marx in the mid 1800s constitutes the main body of this conflict theory, he wrote that the central institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by which capital (money, machines, factories and other material objects) is controlled by a small minority of the population, leading to opposed classes i.e. the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Cohen 1978). Marxists believe that society is based on ascribed status which is given by birth or family background, therefore the bourgeoisie pass down their land and properties to their children, keeping the wealth in the…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most consumer behavior analyses and programs seek to dig out consumers’ needs and wants, which direct their purchasing and decision behaviors. Consumer behavior and choice are complex, inherently dynamic and potentially affected by a number of factors. According to this, it seems that the rational choice theory should make some adjustments to be adopted to this increasingly more dynamic reality and marketing environment and thus set a realistic and stable base for consumer behavior analysis.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays