Rational Choice Deterrence Theory Essay

The theories involved with the study of criminology, deliver a detailed an informative insight into the offence through the criminals or individuals association. The intention is to analytically deliberate how specific criminological theories can be immersed within specific felonies. This essays main objective is to discuss the theory of Rational Choice Deterrence with brief insights into classical theory and discover the fundamental association within the offence of kidnapping.

Kidnapping involves the theft of an individual with the desire of a cash settlement for their survival or, a ransom. Over the centuries the term kidnapping has had association to the idea of the theft of a child. Conversely, it has been stated that the term “kid” was
This criminal theories final instinct is habitually of monetary concern. However, many of basic criminological theories, such as critical or developmental life course theories, state how the upbringing or the status involved with the criminal subsides overtime until it leads to their, eventual, lifestyle pathway. Kidnappers, however, seem to rely more on a “coherent” mind frame normally having experience and a higher degree of knowledge. The Rational choice Deterrence perspective involves more time and savviness before the individual’s involvement. Clarke states that Individual participation in kidnapping and the employing of this theory would seek out the supposed and apparent risks, obtain suitable expertise, and discover the settlement before the idea can even come to fruition (Clarke 1993). Then it leads to specific choice structuring properties that really define to the criminal whether or not they are aware of detailed
Although this theory does, more so, involve the rationality of the costs and benefits that a weighed up, the criminals initial rational comes from the fact that kidnapping , no matter the financial influences, will eventually make up for the original financial deterrence that the crime initially entails. This is where classical theory takes over, although (RCD) is an offshoot of classical theory each theory sits on other ends of the spectrum in regards to financial influences this is because it also has its limitations through small minded criminals pursuing self-interest before weighing up the choices appropriately, it is stated, criminals make bad choices on their own intent and are responsible for such intent (White and Perrone 2010). Therefore a more successful offender would abide to the theory of rational choice deterrence as he/she is not a simpleton, he/she has been down a similar road and knows what to expect and how to avoid certain mistakes made in the past, the weighing up of the multiple choices involved with this theory is necessary and comes from criminal mind that thinks before it