Preview

Ratifying The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1020 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ratifying The Constitution
Ratify to Satisfy
This country is in dire need of a reform. Our government holds no type of power. They do not have the power or the authority to enforce laws deemed necessary for the survival of a sound country. Our country cannot be a successful or authoritative government with the Articles of Confederation in place. So we need to make the conspicuous decision of ratifying the Constitution. The Constitution will fill the holes in our government that is created by the Articles of Confederation. It will establish the Executive Branch; which main purpose is enforcing the laws. Another important reason to ratify the constitution is the fact that it establishes the Judicial Branch that interprets the laws, to make sure they are fair to the people.
…show more content…
It is our first form of government and when making it, everyone was afraid of giving the government too much power. As we can tell today the government needs to have power in order to maintain order. Power is what the government lacks today. States have free reign over their people and take away their power. So in making a better government we can't live in fear of the government having some power. People are fearful that the Constitution will put states and the people completely under the government. Well, fact is that is not true. With the Articles of Confederation, the powers granted to the people are almost useless, the people can't really be heard. With the Constitution it will give people a voice, it will give them a right to petition against their government. It will give the states someone to answer to, which will make them have to make the right decision when it comes to your rights and the laws. Even with the states having to answer to the government, they will still have separate powers. With the ratification of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights will be put into play. The bill of rights are the first ten amendments, which guarantees certain rights to the people and states. The bill of rights is a document that guarantees that the government won’t have too much power or have complete rule over the people. For example, the 10th amendment will read something like this, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” This will be put into place to further define the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Again, it guarantees that the government won’t become too

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As inevitable as the U.S. Constitution feels today as the foundation on which the United States of America and its political system are built, it was not the first document ratified by the former British colonies to establish a union. During the years of the American Revolutionary War and the years directly following it, the newly formed United States of America were essentially a collection of thirteen more or less sovereign states loosely held together in an alliance by the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union (Articles of Confederation). However, as a foundation for a functioning government, the Articles of Confederation were lacking, leaving the federal government essential powerless and unable to effectively execute the few powers explicitly bestowed upon it by the Articles. Fiscal issues and rebellion threaten to tear the young nation…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was not an effective government, but rather, a workable one. We must understand that whenever a government is set up so loosely with no able guidelines, problems are bound to occur. The Articles of Confederation was more a “club” than a government. Anyone could leave whenever they so desired. Unfortunately the government did not work, but ironically, the leaders of our country purposely formulated this weak government out of fear of the past. This was an unavoidable…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way at which we are governed needs to be changed. A better form of government is necessary, one that can unite our states, weigh the competing interests with justice, and stabilize the nation's finances. The Articles were formed as a week way of governing ourselves. Now it's time for us to rid ourselves of this burden and come out strong. Under the Articles we have no central government, which enables us to prosper. For us to grow as one country we must be united. As of now we are but more than one government, each with our own laws, money, and taxes. The Articles are not a strong enough backbone to help us thrive into one nation, so we must come together as whole. Just one government is the wisest choice in our beginning.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States (U.S.) Constitution is the source of all government powers and provides limitations on the government that protect the natural rights of U.S. citizens. Prior to its creation, the 13 original states comprising the U.S., were united under the Articles of Confederation. These articles entrusted a Confederate Congress with the authority to wage war, mediate disputes between states as well as set weights and measures. However, the Confederate Congress was completely funded by individual states, did not have the authority to raise funds itself and all decisions required a unanimous vote of approval from all states. It was far from a perfect government. These limitations along with the historical tendencies high ranking officials have toward greed and abuse of power rendered this Congress ineffective, spawning a collective desire for reform. (Whitehouse.gov, 2017) In 1787 delegates from 12 of the 13 states convened in Philadelphia to draft a new Constitution. Their goals were to design a government that could provide fair treatment to its citizens, keep peace amongst the individual states as well as with outside nations, defend our country from enemies, and to set a standard for living comfortably, well, and free. To achieve this, the government was split into three separate branches and power divided amongst them.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forming this new country was a tough process. There were several different ideas. After realizing that the country was too weak under the Articles of Confederation. In result, there came a new idea; which was to ratify the Constitution. The procedures for ratifying the new Constitution were as controversial as its contents. This is where the fight to ratify the constitution began. The Anti-Federalists had many central arguments against the adoption of the Constitution. The proponents, the Federalist proposed a better argument for defending the ratification of the new Constitution which caused them to prevail.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution fixed many problems dealt with prior to the Constitutional Convention. First of all, a system of checks and balances was put in place for the three separate branches of Government. The Judicial Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Executive Branch. The Judicial Branch is made up of the Supreme Court and other Federal Courts. The Legislative Branch is made up of the House and Senate, and is Congress. The Executive Branch is made up of the President, and it passes laws, or Executes them. Checks and balances was created so no branch could become more powerful than the other(s). This system is described in Document 6; “Executive Branch… Can veto, or refuse to sign laws… Legislative Branch… Can override veto of the President…” This is also described in Document 7; “Judicial Branch… Can declare laws unconstitutional…” The list goes on about how each branch checks on each other. This is helpful because it ensures that every section of Government is just as important as the others. Another change with the Articles of Confederation was that Congress was given the power to tax. This is mentioned in Document 1; “Congress given the power to tax.” Also mentioned in Document 1; “Only the National Government has the power to coin money.” Now that Congress can tax the people, they can raise an army and pay for other things they couldn't…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conclusion of the convention should bring me solace but I find that it only brings me distress for the future of our country. I do not believe that we established a wise and just government. I believe that this government is destined to either become a monarchy or fall into the hands of a corrupt and oppressive aristocracy. Granting the plan we decided upon is superior to The Articles. The Articles of Confederation was a government that should have never been thought up. There were too many weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation. Congress had an extremely difficult time passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed. Since there was no president or an executive branch, there was no way to make sure that laws passed by Congress were carried out. There were no courts to interpret laws or to judge those that broke them because a national court system did not exist. To make matters worse, changing the Articles of Confederation was nearly impossible. A unanimous vote of all 13 states was required before any changes could be made and having that happen was nigh impossible. Not only was there a problem with the laws but congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expenses of the national government! Congress could ask for money, yet it had no power to force the states into paying them. Without money, Congress could not pay the nation's debt nor could it provide government programs and services. Another Problem under the Articles was that the national government could not control trade between the states or with foreign nations. Each state regulated its own trade, which resulted in many disputes among the states and with other nations as well. In addition, most states made their own money. Without a constant national currency, trading was a difficult process. The Articles made each state act like a small, separate nation. The people of each state saw themselves as citizens…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the monarchial rule under George III the people lacked governmental power. There are two sides to ratifying the Constitution. The Federalists who want to adopt the Constitution and the Antifederalists who wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation. Many Antifederalists believed that the governmental power should rest in the states, and…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The U.S. has just won its independence from Britain. A new form of government needs to be instituted. Out came the Articles of Confederation. Under the articles the federal government had very little power. It was quite clear the articles would not last for long.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison was one of the founding father and fourth president of United States. Madison draft most of the US constitution and all of the Bill of Rights and later he was referred as “Father of Constitution.” He wrote federalist 10 in late 1700s which played influencing role in ratification of the constitution. In his federalist #10 he addresses his vision concerning the constitution and focuses on the issue of small country is good or bad through his examination of factions. Madison defines faction as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of others citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the ratification of the constitution had a big impact in American history people rights were not revised, they stayed the same before the ratification and after. However it did change politically; establishing branches of government and issues between foreign countries. Also it changed economically, issues over currency and debate over parties. Therefore the ratification of the constitution was a turning point in American history.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the United States won the war against England in Yorktown it was up to the colonists to build a government from the ground up. The decisions made in the creation of the United States were arguably the most important events in the united states. In the year 1788 the Constitution was ratified by New Hampshire, officially doing away with articles of the confederation that so heavily hindered the government previously, creating a more balanced government that is still in place today.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an important moment for delegates to decide whether or not to ratify The Constitution. This is an important moment in our countries history because the delegates are deciding how the government is going to work.Why we have created this document is because the Articles of Confederation aren't working, and people think that the constitution are not going to work either.The proposed will give us Constitution nothing but failure. The Constitution shouldn't be ratified because this form of government has never been tried, even by Great Britain, and it could destroy the country a lot worse then the Articles of Confederation, it not only will do that but, even with the risk, we will have all branches of government to be filled with the wealthy elite class of people. And for these reasons, I think we shouldn't ratify the Constitution.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S. Constitution?…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays