Preview

R. V. Latimer Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1187 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
R. V. Latimer Case Study
The reason I chose this case was due to the fact it was a popular case throughout my childhood and because my cousin was a quadriplegic and had a form of cerebral palsy where she was limited to being taken care of by medical and hospital staff I was just a small child at this time my family would have regular visits with her One summer she got extremely sick and went into a coma my aunt then had to make the decision to keep her on life support or to let her go So this case is very relevant to what happened but under different conditions and circumstances.
According to the events depicted in R.v. Latimer 1994 On October 24 1993 Mrs. Latimer and her 3 children were out to Sunday church during that time Robert Latimer and Tracy Latimer were at
…show more content…
1046) The police knew of Tracy’s cause of death which had aroused their suspicion towards Robert so they had reasonable grounds to believe he was involved in an indictable offence In the final submission and the argument of the defence they stated that Roberts statements were not voluntary and he had experienced pressure from the two officers, and the statements should be excluded This pressure did not amount to trickery and did not affect Robert’s decision between right and wrong in his answers and did not deprive him of the right to remain silent during the questions (R.v. Latimer, 1994) Later in November 1994 Latimer had been found guilty of 2nd degree murder sentenced to 10 years He was then released on bail while his case was being appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada the Supreme Court then ordered a new trial due to interference with the jury The second trial then resulted in a 2nd conviction of 2nd degree murder he was then given a mandatory minimum 10 year sentence for 2nd degree murder They then found 10 years to be cruel and unusual punishment which is under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms s.12 which states “Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.”(Martin, 2016, pg. 1919) Latimer was then sentenced to 10 years with no possibility of parole he then served half of his time in a provincial jail and half on his farm The Supreme Court then began to launch clemency petitions in 2001 Latimer also began to serve his sentence in William Head Prison during that year In 2007 Latimer had requested day parole from the national parole board he stated that killing his daughter was the right thing to do and he was then denied day parole

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first time the case went to court was to resolve the dispute over her neurologic devastation and how her parents and her husband were interpreting her wishes regarding life support. The courts ruled in her husband’s favor, that Terri would not want continued life support and the decision was made to withdraw life sustaining treatment. Her parents appealed the decision to remove treatment and won, because their physicians stated that Terri was not in a permanent vegetative state. Her husband and parents again went to court regarding PVS, and once again her husband was granted the right to remove…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The selection that makes a more effective argument is selection 1 " Lochner v. New York Decision" because it not only give strong evidence it also states that this is the man is a second time offender. As stated in the selection "after having been therefore convicted of a violation of the same act, and therefore, as averred, he committed the crime or misdemeanor, second offense." It also says that somebody who work passed the maximum number of hours wouldn't develop any health problems, but it states that he, "wrongfully and unlawfully required and permitted an employee working with him in his biscuit, bread, and cake bakery and confectionery establishment, to work more than sixty hours in one week." What this quote from the text is saying…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It troubled him that the Judge Teel described Nancy’s condition as “unresponsive and hopeless” with “no cognitive purpose for her except sound and perhaps pain.” If Nancy feels pain then she is not in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). We did not know what was going on behind the scenes, but later it would all come to light. Our case bypassed the appellate court of Missouri and headed straight to the Missouri Supreme Court, with a little assistance. Our case was scheduled for review in September, along with a case that has opposite opinions as ours. In other words, the parents of a young man named Phillip Radar, that was diagnosed as being brain dead, did not want to let their child go, but the hospital caring for him did. Phillip’s heart was beating even though he was brain dead. Both of the cases were scheduled to be heard on the same morning in September, but on August 31st Phillip’s heart stopped and the effort to revive him was unsuccessful. His death left our case as the only one to be…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What are the significant differences between the Quinlan, Cruzan, and Wenland cases? Why are these three cases important? In the case of Quinlan, her wishes had been made known by previous oral and written statements she had made. In this case her father was the surrogate speaking her wishes and fighting the courts systems who had ruled against his decision to remove her respirator. This was then overturned on the grounds of the constitutional right to privacy covers the decisions of formerly competent patients whose legal surrogates may speak for them, when they no longer can. She did not die when her respirator was taken off, she continued to breathe on her own. The family did not want her tube feeding removed because they thought she would suffer.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quinlan Case Study

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page

    Bernice, thank you for your post on the Quinlan case. I remembered hearing about the case when it was in the news but I did not follow the story. The Quinlan's legal case set precedent and established a patient's right to refuse medical care and control his or her own medical treatment. There were the development of advance directives, the creation of ethics committees in hospitals, nursing homes and hospices, and the invention of Health Care Proxies all because of Karen Ann Quinlan. Karen became the symbol of abuse of technology in this technological age. Thank you for your post.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first amendment in the Bill of Rights states “Congress shall make no law respecting…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States v. Lopez case was the first United States Supreme Court case since the early 1930’s to create laws that limit Congress’s power. On March 10th of 1992, Lopez brought a handgun into school. When the police asked him if he did bring it , he didn't lie, he said the " yes I did carry the gun".Not a few days later Lopez was charged with violating federal laws which banned guns on all school properties in the United States. Because of what he did , the federal law came with an act called "Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1990".…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R. v. Morgentaler was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada, a verdict which declared abortion laws in the Criminal Code of Canada as arbitrary and unconstitutional. The court ruled the laws to have violated the woman's right to security of the person under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to security of person. After the ruling, you could not be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada for having an abortion without consent of the therapeutic abortion committee.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This particular oxymoronic characteristic of religious freedom is evident when looking at the legal case of Town of Greece v. Galloway, which could be argued as a case that violates the Establishment Clause. This case deals with the monthly business meetings in the town of Greece. Galloway and Stephens sued the town and John Auberger because they were feeling uncomfortable as each meeting began with a prayer (Stahl). Galloway and Stephens argued that they felt discriminated because Christian prayers were preferred the most (Stahl).…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it was said she could live many more years with machine support, the doctors stated there was no chance of recovery. (Gaudin) The family also had been paying expensive medical bills because of her need for machine support, and they were struggling financially. Nancy was not the only child of her parents, so expenses were piling high. (LLP) Her family believed that they had clear evidence that Nancy would not want to be in the state she was in. Many of Nancy's friends, including Nancy's housemate, had verbal proof that a year earlier, she had stated she would not want to live in a vegetative unresponsive state unless 'she was half normal'. (Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech 1) However, to the court this was not enough convincing proof. Justice Sandra O' Conner stated that this could be considered assisted suicide. It was said that because a competent person cannot refuse food or water in a hospital setting, an irrational person should not be allowed to either. (LLP) However, if a patient had the want to die due to incredible pain, deformity, etc., they could refuse a feeding tube. The question in term is how we decide if a person is irrational or not. Do specific people decide the severity of the pain or the quality of life? (Gaudin…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Terri Schiavo Case

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Regarding the other case of the pregnant women, I feel this is entirely a different situation in many ways. She was not able to breathe on her own. Being in a vegetative state and not being capable of breathing…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is obvious why this case and especially its verdict has caused such an uproar with ethicists and society. The ethical dilemma presented in this case is whether Canadian law has the authority to prohibit Sue Rodriguez the right to pursue physician assisted suicide as a way to end her life.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    R. V Burns Case Brief

    • 2031 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The accused claimed to the Minister that their section 6(1) (right to remain and return to Canada) charter rights would be violated if they were extradited, and that as a result the Minister should consider if the defendants could be tried in Canada (para.16). The respondents also claimed section 7 (fundamental justice) and section 12 (cruel and unusual punishment) of the charter would be violated if extradited. The appellants differentiated their case from R. v. Kindler and Ng because they were Canadian citizens, while Kindler and Ng were not. They claimed that Canada does not have the right to send its citizens away with the possibility of never returning contrary to 6(1) of the charter (para.17). The respondents also claim that their age at the time of the alleged offences, 18, should be taken into consideration. The Minister rejected the claim of banishment, because the purpose of the treaty was to allow criminals to face criminal proceedings and once proceedings have been finished the respondent 's could return to Canada (para.19) He also rejected the age argument because they…

    • 2031 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays