Preview

R. V. Latimer Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
579 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
R. V. Latimer Case Brief
Tracey Latimer the daughter of Robert Latimer was 12 years old and had cerebral

palsy, Because of this she required around the clock care by her parents. She was

not dying from this but she was in extreme pain. Tracey went through multiple

surgeries. Robert believed that putting his daughter through more surgeries would

be cruel and unjust. As a result of this Robert decided to bring his daughter into the

garage and put her in his car, he then turned the engine on and poisoned her with

carbon monoxide. Tracey’s mother was not involved in this, Latimer denied killing

her at first but he later then confessed for his actions .In the trial R. V Latimer

(1997) Robert was convicted for second degree murder although the Supreme
…show more content…
In the resulting second trial, Mr. Latimer was again indicted second degree

murder, however he was sentenced to just a single year in jail instead of the

minimum required ten under the Criminal Code, since in the conditions of the case

10 years was seen as cruel and unusual. The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal later

expanded the sentence to 10 years. Mr. Latimer in the end advanced the case to the

Supreme Court, contending that the sentence was too long as well as that the trial

was uncalled for in light of the fact that the judge chose the guard of need couldn't

be contended despite the fact that this choice came simply after the resistance had

contended it. It was additionally asserted that the judge had deluded the jury into

feeling that they could impact the length of the sentence. Since numerous in the jury

longed for a lighter sentence than that endorsed by the Criminal Code, it has been

contended that the jury may have turned to jury invalidation had they realized that

they couldn't choose the length of the sentence.

The Court first held that not just was the safeguard of need not able to legitimize

Robert Latimer's activities additionally the inapplicability of the guard ought to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 2011 Lafler V. Cooper was a case where Cooper was being charged with assault with intent to murder and three other offenses for shooting a woman in the thigh and buttocks after missing a shot in her head. In criminal court they offered to dismiss two of the charges and to recommend a 51-85 month sentence on the other two in exchange for a guilty plea. After entering the guilty plea, he then rejected the offer after his lawyer told him that the prosecution would be unable to establish intent to murder because the victim had been shot below the waist. Criminal…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Latimer Famous Quotes

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Latimer challenged the sentence on the grounds that the mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years for second degree murder constituted cruel and unusual punishment. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) dismissed Mr. Latimer’s appeal and upheld his life sentence with no parole eligibility for 10 years. The SCC held that the mandatory minimum sentence for second degree murder was constitutional and consistent with the goals of sentencing. The court also ruled that the trial judge was correct in not allowing the jury to consider the defense of…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You are a legal scholar on sentencing invited as a guest lecturer to provide information on the…

    • 2267 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statement

    • 938 Words
    • 1 Page

    hoping for the 10 years. The point had come up that this was his first offense to he should get a…

    • 938 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue on appeal is whether the accused has reasonable grounds to questions if the jurors posses bias against aboriginal peoples that will have an effect on their decision. [at para. 7] The questions that were asked were; 1. did any jurors have racial bias or prejudice that could affect his/her decisions, 2. if any jurors did have bias or prejudice, were they capable of setting aside them for the purposes of the trial. [at para. 3]…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Loeffler, R. L., & Lawson, T. J. (2002). Age and occupational status of defendant in relation…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Movie: Twelve Angry Men

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the judge has assessed the harm and culpability in the offence, other factors are then considered that may provide context to the incident (Ministry of Justice, 2010). Despite the guidelines, judges are obligated to use their discretion to consider all mitigating and aggravating factors included in the case, which relate to the offence or the offender and provide information about the circumstances when the offence was committed (Sentencing Council,…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    Blakely v. Washington case the judge take the sentencing and gives a major sentencing to Blakely of 90 months. The defense takes the case to the supreme court and judge Scalia argues that his sixth amendment was violated and he can have a trial. They find the sentence was cruel and they…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tkam Reflection

    • 627 Words
    • 1 Page

    innocent and died trying to escape jail which Bob put him in. In a way, Bob is responsible for…

    • 627 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Potential jurors are summoned to court using master jury lists. The people who are summoned, called, the “venire,” come to court to participate in voir dire, a process designed to select a fair and impartial petit jury by asking members of the venir about potential biases concerning the case. Those who cannot serve as fair and impartial jurors are exused for cause. A few other memebers of the venire may be excused by either party using peremptory challenges so long as these challenges are not used in a discriminatory manner that violates the constitutional of equal protection.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a judge has to make a decision on a sentence it can be a very difficult…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    theo about rerum novarum

    • 4018 Words
    • 11 Pages

    --February 17 - Colin Ferguson is convicted of six counts of murder for the December 1993 Long Island Rail Road shootings and later receives a 200+ year sentence.…

    • 4018 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Incorrect

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    which he was executed, and admitted mutilating the body of the 14-year-old girl he killed. I can’t help…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They Jury System

    • 1774 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This topic was selected so the researcher could gather information on the topic at hand and the researcher hopes to find proper solutions to the problems plagued by the jury system.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays