For what was considered the least talked about issue in society, sexuality was in many ways what defined the individual, their society, culture and the legal and moral laws that presided within it. The controllers of power were white, middle class, heterosexual men. If one of the white, middle to upper class men were found to be practising homosexuality they were gaoled and deemed to be under the influence of Satan himself. Homosexuality was in many ways to the hegemonic masculinity an abdication of the throne, stepping …show more content…
and We 're Here! '
Queer theory and Queer politics is often hard to comprehend, and harder to define since part of it 's basis is intentionally having no set definition. Queer theory is surrounded by contradictions, difficulties, opposing thoughts and political debate.
Queer theorists have different ideas on what is 'Queer ' and what is not 'Queer ' and some Queer theorists believe there is no set doctrine in which to be 'Queer ' because that would adhere to the 'norm 's ' of heteronormativity. Examining different 'Queer ' thoughts can help aid our own formulation of what is 'Queer ' and what 'Queer theory ' is to the individual and how it can help develop understandings around sexuality, gender, history, societies, cultures and heteronormativity.
Queer Theory assumes that sexual identities are a function of representations. It assumes that representations pre-exist and define, as well as complicate and disrupt sexual identities. That people discover their identities by working with (and against) the identities the culture represents as possibilities.
Queer theory drawing very much from the theory of performativity, where sexual identity is marked on the body and is in a constant process of