Preview

The quality of life for all humans would greatly improve

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The quality of life for all humans would greatly improve
If the governments of the world adopted a socialist philosophy and economy, in recognition of the fact that we are all stuck on this rock together, the quality of life for all humans would greatly improve.

First, there would no longer be a need for war. With a sense of global community and the accompanying economy there wouldn't be any motivation to wage wars with each

other. There would be no super-powers, no struggle to attain land or control natural resources. Humans are the only animals in nature that kill each other for reasons of greed and power. How refreshing it would be to finally evolve beyond our current bellicose nature. If we banned together as a world wide society, we could, at long last, live in peace.

Next, we could direct our resources and efforts toward fighting the diseases that afflict us. A socialist-based economy would practically eliminate hunger by providing

enough sustenance for everyone, and that would effectively end our battle with malnutrition. Without the political walls put up by governments around scientific and

medical research, we would be able to pool our knowledge and further advance our understanding of medicine. Searching for cures and treatments of diseases would no

longer be a competitive, profitable endeavor.

Finally, the only way humans as a race can hope to progress is first by becoming peaceful in nature and, secondly, by joining together and concentrating our efforts on gaining an understanding for where we fit in the universe. We would all benefit from such a focusing of effort. When we shift our attention from the rat-race pursuit of going to work just to maintain what we've acquired, to a more meaningful quest for real understanding, we truly will separate ourselves form the animals. The exploration of our universe, for example, is in its zygote stage; we know little enough about the community in which we live. How can we be so egocentric as a race to be on a tiny planet in a vast universe and not explore our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Human social order is a facade. We as a species are able to perform at a higher level of intelligence than most species of the planet and our ability to reason is tantamount to our success. This along with our technology, from the flame to the invention of penicillin has made us the dominant species. Our restless drive for knowledge and the ability to attain it has driven us from the era of hiding in huts from nature, to the age of a new frontier. Although we believe ourselves to be superior in all aspects to the lower creatures of this earth. “In the Animal kingdom, the rule is eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom, define or be defined.” Thomas Szasz…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery”- Winston Churchill…

    • 5703 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socialism is the idea of a social organization that supports production, distribution, and trade that should be controlled within the community itself. There are many aspects of socialism that are unique, setting it apart from other social systems in the world. The ‘social’ aspect of socialism gives evidence to the fact that in the system, everyone in society is expected to contribute to the economic production of the state. In socialized health care, everyone pays the government and those who need care, get it without paying extra. Citizens all have to pay the same amount and have access to the same benefits. The problem this system runs into, however, is that there often is not enough money to go around. People tend to become greedy when they see that some things are free and then start to abuse the system. According to Einstein the real purpose is “…precisely…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donna Haraway's Analysis

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages

    From a religious perspective, some argue that early Christian views created the first sense of human-nonhuman divisions with the claims that men and women could not be animals since humans are the image of ‘God’. However, according to Linnaeus’ taxonomy and later confirmed and elaborated by Darwin, there was acknowledgment that humans were animals. Richard Ryder, a member of the Oxford Group, which is centered on animal rights, claimed the “full awareness of our kinship with other animals was ‘intermittent’ and became “discouraged by the Church” (Yates PT 1: Human Supremacy: Constructing the ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ Sides of The Species Barrier). Moreover, the Church explained that ‘God’ said himself in the Bible to “be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it” (Aitken). Thus began “Man’s ‘dominionism’ over and above creation” and human supremacy is favored (Yates PT 1: Human Supremacy: Constructing the ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ Sides of The Species Barrier). From a philosophical perspective, many philosophers can claim that human supremacy is justifiable. Francis Bacon, a 17th century philosopher, declared, “Man was at the center of the world” (Yates PT 1: Human Supremacy: Constructing the ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ Sides of The Species Barrier). He continued to argue that if it was not for human control of the natural world, “all would go astray” because there would be “no purpose” and “no aim” (Yates PT 1: Human Supremacy: Constructing the ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ Sides of The Species Barrier). Rene Descartes, another great thinker, also believed in human exceptionalism. He supported his claim by cutting both nonhumans and humans, and saw that each contained blood vessels, organs, tissues, etc. He concluded that the reason non-humans differed from humans is that they lack thought (Yates PT 1: Human Supremacy: Constructing the ‘Right’ and ‘Wrong’ Sides of…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Biotechnology, Stem Cell replacement. Stem cell replacement is a huge goal for scientist it will also have a huge positive impact on society, reason being this technology would allow doctors to create any tissue or organ in the body from a single stem cell. This would change everything in a positive way. This would allow them to create major organs, tissues they may even be able to cure certain diseases. This may lead to one of the greatest success in the history of science.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For a new health care system I would impliment free health care for the poor and elderly. No longer would people that are struggling on a day to day basis have to pay for there medications…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    would now be free from inequality and take responsibility of any failure or shortcomings on…

    • 464 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People and scientists of all kinds have been trying for centuries to solve the problems of poverty, starvation and overpopulation.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    our United States would prosper exponentially and there wouldn't be any strife or seperation amongst…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this weeks discussion, the topic “poverty” made me visualize exactly how poor the lower and some what of the middle class really is. The video that was viewed on Monday was an eye-opening moment, as it presented how the American wealth is really distributed. In my belief, the income of citizens should be more of a linear distribution, rather than a exponential distribution. It is unnecessary for the top one percent individual to be making 20 percent of the American wealth, while the poor class are struggling to even to make at least 1 percent that. For this reason, I would consider my ideal economic system to be Socialism. Socialism helps evenly distribute wealth among their citizens, in hopes that no individual would have to face extreme…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socialism can be defined as a system that treats all of its citizens as equals. A socialist system in the United States would greatly benefit the societal good. A universal health care system could be adopted with great success if only we are to follow the examples of other socialist countries like France.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brave New World

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the new world, everyone would need to be open-minded. If we all stepped back and looked at life as a whole, things wouldn’t be taken for granted and there would be a lot less judging and much more doing. Hopefully, people would finally learn to give everyone and everything an equal chance. No one would be above anyone else; everything would be equal. With people living fulfilling lives, we would all live in peace and harmony.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree that technology is the answer to world hunger to a certain extent. High Yielding Varieties(HYVs) improved breeds of rice, wheat and other cereals developed by crossing-breeding a broad range of cereal strains. They have valuable traits such as pest resistance or faster growth duration compared to normal cereals. For example, IR58'wonder rice' which has shorter growing period is resistant to pests and diseases. Using HYVs, China's rice output was more than doubled from 1961 to 1992. Also, modern irrigation is introduced as a modern technology to intensify food production. Irrigation is the practice of supplying water to the land through artificial means which enable farmers to control the amount of water supplied to crops. It helps land to be fertile and maintain flooded conditions, no longer need to depend on rain or crops can be grown, thus a higher yield is achieved. Besides, chemicals such as fertilisers help to add nutrients to the soil to encourage growth of crops. Toxic chemicals can be used to destroy pests which may affect crop growth. Use of fertilisers may result in growth of weeds, so herbicides could be used to…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From each according to his ability, to each according to his deeds (socialism). From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs (communism).…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A wish, another wish and another. That is what most people will wish for. They only wish for their own benefits but never think of others. For me, I would like the world to be the original mother-nature.…

    • 322 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays