Morris describes that justice is generally seen as being owed to us or something that everyone deserves to have. He explains that humans generally have what he calls "circumstances of justice" which adults have moral obligations are owed certain moral considerations to each other. Justice consists of three basic moral rights: life, liberty, and property. When a person sacrifices there moral obligations (committing a crime) he or she must also sacrifice there rights (punishments). In his opinion, wrongdoers must lose some of there right by there acts.
Morris says ending the life of someone who has broken this "circumstances of justices" should be accepted because they have placed themselves outside of it. Governments utilize the death penalty to deter people from interfering with other peoples natural born rights of life and liberty. In this way rights are not removed from a person because they never possessed the moral obligations in the first place. Morris gives the example of how contract killers, war criminals, and terrorists have no moral right because they don't respect the circumstances of justice.
In conclusion, Morris tells us that punishment is justified because they lose the moral rights that they would have been protected from through justice. Moral standing is list by the wrongdoer as with moral rights.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Justice is generally agreed upon in the Western world as the upholding of moral rightness through authority’s supervision of the law. However, due to differences in laws and authority figures around the world, every individual has a unique set of moral values and ideas of what is “right.” As a result, one may develop an idea of justice that seems corrupt to someone who is familiar with a different system of laws. Franz Kafka presents this scenario in his short story, “In the Penal Colony.” The officer of the penal colony believes that justice is the fulfillment of what is morally right through the violent punishment of all persons suspicious of breaking the law. Kafka invites his readers to consider that this idea of justice that contrasts…
- 1974 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
It is an established fact, that capital punishment is still conducted in many countries of the earth. People are being sentenced to death every day and in my essay I am going to respond to the ethic question whether death penalty serves as a justified and valid form of punishment.…
- 605 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Pojman, Louis. "A Defense of the Death Penalty." Issues in Applied Ethics: n. pag. Contemporary Issues in Applied Ethics ebook. Web. 11 Apr. 2011.…
- 1930 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…
- 2028 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…
- 1120 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…
- 2611 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Therefore it achieves its purpose by controlling and regulating societies’ behavior through effective and rationale punishment. If the government sets out a policy like the death penalty its use must be justified not only legally, but also socially, politically, and in execution. Instances, where these doctrines are misused and misinterpreted by the officials in charge of implementing them, brings into question its overall legitimacy. Justice Marshall states there are “ six purposes conceivably served by capital punishment: retribution, deterrence, prevention of repetitive criminal acts, encouragement of guilty pleas and confessions, eugenics, and economy,” ( 63). These purposes provide an idea to justify the use of capital punishment. Yet, if the use of the penalty does not help with the with controlling crime, specifically with the uses of the ideas provided by Justice Marshall, then its overall use should be questioned. The blatant racial bias found towards African-Americans in death penalty sentencing puts into question the legitimacy of the legal system and more specifically the effectiveness of the death penalty. Thus, if the policy discriminately targets specific races, minorities, and ethnicities it is evident this policy must be examined and questioned. Moreover, as Justice Marshall states “…
- 1163 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…
- 360 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of the death penalty is to allow states the right to punish criminals with the highest possible punishment, death. People argue that it is morally wrong for the death penalty to exist, because it allows people to “play God.” Others believe that it helps protect our country from criminals and save lives. Due to this controversy, the death penalty has became a major source of debate in the United States.…
- 603 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“We’re only human, we all make mistakes." The death penalty has been the highest form of criminal punishment in the American judicial system since the 13 colonies. There has been many forms of the death penalty like hanging, stoning, drowning, burning, beheading, gasing, electrocution, and injection. The taking of a man's life as punishment for criminal behavior is wrong. The moral injustice of murder, the cruelty of execution, and the death of innocent men are all concerns that make the death penalty wrong. The government should abolish the death penalty in order to observe morality, end cruelty, and protect innocent men. What is the death penalty?…
- 839 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…
- 1055 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
proper principles of justice are those that tend to have the best consequences. These rules may turn out to be familiar ones such as keeping contracts; but equally, they may not, depending on the facts about real consequences. Mill tries to explain our mistaken belief that justice is overwhelmingly important by arguing that it derives from two natural human tendencies: our desire to retaliate against those who hurt us, and our ability to put ourselves imaginatively in another's place. So, when we see someone harmed, we project ourselves into her situation and feel a desire to retaliate on her behalf. If this process…
- 103 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The death penalty has been and will always be one of the most controversial topics in life, with opposing sides for and against, the death penalty is still obscure to many. The official definition of death penalty is execution of an offender being sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of criminal offense. The terms capital punishment and death penalty are frequently used to mean the same thing, though some believe there is a small difference between the terms. Death penalty is referring to the penalty received while capital punishment is referring to merely the execution. Around the world, death penalty has been exercised thousands of times throughout many centuries, the first execution in America occurred in…
- 1011 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment should be viewed as the stripping away of humanity from a person. The death penalty itself should be "executed" because of racial inequities, the concept of murder, the possibility of error, lack of deterrence, the cost, and an overwhelmed legal system. "The goal of capital punishment is revenge" (Introduction 1). Capital punishment is simply an outlet for the bloodlust of the American people (Introduction 1).…
- 1289 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays