In this essay I am going to study the creativity and psychological traits that helped master the excellence of Emily Dickinson’s work. I am going to approach this essay by using five important question usually asked when studying any creative person. What did the individual do/ produce that marked them out as creative? What individual psychological traits were important? How did she achieve recognition for her creativity? Who influenced/ tutored/ trained/ recognised their talent? And why they are still recognised as creative? Emily Dickinson known globally as one of the most inspirational and creative American poets is a very interesting person. In this essay I going to explore in detail the background of Emily Dickinson’s creativity and explain why so many years later after the death of such a powerful writer, her work is still studied and read by many. Emily Dickinson born December 10, 1830 was an American poet. Born in Amherst, Massachusetts, to a successful family with strong community ties, she lived a mostly introverted and reclusive life. Acquaintances describe her voice as soft and childlike, but when she was ready to talk, she would talk nonstop (Kirk, C.A 2004). Dickinson was a force to be reckoned with when it came to the use of language. She was frugal with time and didn’t like to waste it in small talk with people she knew neither for political status nor for financial gain (Kirk, C.A .2004). Emily Dickinson was a driven woman- a woman to create art (Kirk, C.A. 2004) yet according to Grabher, G. 1998 at the centre of any serious investigation of Emily Dickinson’s poetry, is the problem of context. We know very little about the intentions and inspirations that shaped Dickinson’s literary. Every true poet is unique in a certain way and Dickinson’s uniqueness is visually and verbally striking. She is the most instantly recognisable of poets. Her idiosyncratic genius is clearly seen in the imaginatively intense short lyrics without titles; the eccentric, unconventional punctuation; the capitalisations; the irregularities; the cryptic, puzzling images; the dash; the rhymes and half-rhymes. Judging from internal evidence provided by her poems and letters and by her own acknowledgement. Grabher, G.1998 states that Emily Dickinson was sensitive to the most visual arts of her day, including sculpture. But as , Grabher,G.1998 explains, it was painting and the related art, drawing, that seem most significantly to her affected her choice of language while shaping her aesthetic- her conception of the function of poetry. Throughout her life, Dickinson would remain a close reader of nature’s text and a keen chronicler of its activities. Her poetry is replete with observations of natural processes as minute as a spider “sewing at night” and as vast as the “firmaments rowing” their way across the heavens (Lundin, R.2004). Dickinson had her most creative period during the time of the war: she wrote more than half of her entire corpus between 1861 and 1865, and she questioned the significance of suffering in an age that tended to romanticize death ( Macylay Doriani,B. 1996). Most of Dickinson’s poems capture different moods, her extreme psychological states: there are moments of sudden intoxication ( ‘I taste a liquor never brewed’), hopefulness, pain and suffering (‘The soul has Bandaged moments-‘); there is a detailed exploration of the meaning of death; a delight in the world of nature (‘A Bird came down the Walk’) and its danger and mystery (‘A narrow Fellow in the Grass’). Though Dickinson lived in Amherst for most of her life and lived in her father’s house all of that time, it is characteristic that she only mentions Amherst by name in two of her 1,775 poems. Other personal details are never understandably revealed in her poetry. It is not always possible to say if she is addressing another or if she is speaking to herself. There is very little to be known about how or even whether Dickinson...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document