Preview

Proven Guilty

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
277 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Proven Guilty
The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" should not be taken lightly. "Presumption of innocence" means to stress that the prosecution has the duty to prove each charge of the illegal/unlawful act beyond a reasonable doubt and that the accused bears no burden of proof.
However, the notion of being innocent until proven guilty is not a right granted by the Constitution but is a part of common law. Ultimately common law uses former courts cases to make its determinations in regards to innocence or guilt. Therefore, if a similar case was already resolved, the court is usually bound to follow that outcome, however when the court finds that the current issue is ultimately unique from all previous cases, judges have the authority and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Innocent until proven guilty; a phrase commonly used by the accused. But if the accused is guilty but never proven to be, does that mean he is innocent? An example of this is Steve Harmon in the novel, Monster. Steve is on trial for felony murder for a robbery. In the book, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, although Steve Harmon is pronounced innocent, he is actually guilty because he lied to the jury, is familiar with the crime, and is paranoid.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day there are cases with little to no evidence and people going to jail despite the lack of evidence. That very thing happened to Adnan Masud Syed; On February 25, 2000, he was found guilty of the first-degree murder of Hae Min Lee. In January of 1999 Hae’s body was found manhandling strangled in a shallow grave in (name of park) one month after she went missing. Jay Wilds, Syed’s best friend, says he helped Syed dump her dead body but was not there for the murder. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? It is hard to convict someone of murder with no physical evidence.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith V Cain Ap Go Po

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court case of Smith V Cain was an unusual one in which the defendant was claiming that many of his rights were being denied and he was given unfair trial. Smith was being prosecuted for the murder of 5 people in a Louisiana home. The only eye witness was an actual survivor of the shooting whose name was Burl Cain. Cain claimed that Juan Smith was one of the gunmen who murdered 5 innocent people in a Louisiana home. The court case climbed its way from the lower courts due to a writ of Certiorari on January 31st, 2011, and from that point on was sent through a series of juries and decisions in which the original decision of the case was reviewed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court felt that the original claim by Juan Smith that his rights were denied, was plausible and that they needed to certiorari the decision to make sure that Smith was granted another trial. From the Supreme Court’s decision to Certiorari the decision it can be inferred that they wanted to make sure that Juan Smith was rewarded a second and fair trial that would give him a standing chance at actually being escaping the jail time that he would have to serve if he were to actually be convicted of murdering the 5 people in the Louisiana house that day.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Davis Case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    . . . Under the doctrine, once an appellate court rules upon a question presented on appeal, litigants and lower courts become bound by the ruling, which is considered to be the law of the case . . . . Not only are lower courts bound by the law of the case, but decisions rendered by a prior appellate panel will generally govern the second appeal at the same appellate level as well, unless the previous decision is incorrect because it is out of keeping with controlling principles announced by a higher court and following the decision would result in manifest injustice.”…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * You never find out if the defendant is truly innocent or guilty. You only find out what the jury decides.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people, when not involved in a criminal case, are under the assumption and believe that our civil rights are protected by the U.S. Constitution, specifically the Fifth Amendment, which states an individual cannot be charged twice for the same crime; known as the “double jeopardy” rule. Although this is accurate, what many individuals do not understand is that this will only apply if a defendant has been either convicted or acquitted of a crime. For example, if a defendant is acquitted of a murder, the state is able to charge him with the same crime, and then continually go to trial until a conviction is made. However, if the defendant goes to trial and the trial ends in either a mistrial or hung jury, the state will often charge the defendant again (Balko,…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boerum Case Study

    • 4801 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Where a trial court makes a ruling as a matter of law, the standard of review is de novo. United States v. Gaviria, 116 F.3d 1498, 1531 (D.C. Cir. 1997). Alleged violations of the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation…

    • 4801 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    paralegal

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Common law is found in the decisions of the courts rather than statutes; judge- made law…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some individuals say people are innocent until proven guilty. This is not the case for everybody. For example, in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird there are two characters, Tom Robinson and Boo Radley who are thought of badly by some of the people because they are different than the norm. Due to the fact that Boo and Tom are different then the rest, people tend to jump to conclusions. They assume that they are guilty before they are proven guilty.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gloria Killian Forgiveness

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This could happen if someone was in the wrong place at the wrong time or framed by setting them up to look like they did a crime. There has been thousands of cases were there has been men and women who have been wrongly accused and have had to serve years and years in a jail or prison cell because they courts accused them of something they didn’t do. A great example of being wrongfully accused would be a woman named Gloria Killian, she was accused of a robbery and murder she had nothing to do with, and she was set up and served 16 years and four months. Gloria said “I’m innocent. I did not plan the robbery. I did not know those people. I was not involved. I am not the perpetrator”. The crime she was convicted of occurred in 1981, near Sacramento, California. What really happened was that two men had broken into the home of 71 year-old Ed Davies, who was a coin collector and kept a lot of gold and silver in his home. When people arrived on scene Ed was found dead on the kitchen floor. Within days, authorities got a tip and arrested career criminal Gary Masse and charged him with the Davies’ murder. Gloria says she never knew Masse, but when an anonymous tip mentioned her name and his together, she was arrested. She told police she had no idea who Gary was but they didn’t buy into her claims of innocence after they discovered a notebook…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, the difficulty of proving someone is either guilty or innocent may cause one to be wrongfully convicted. One can be mistaken for another based on evidence that is invalid or irrelevant to the case. “A look-alike innocent person can be mistaken for the person who committed the crime”…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    3 important amendments

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The 5th amendment protects the right to a fair and speedy public trial by jury, including the rights to be notified of the accusations, to confront the accuser, to obtain witnesses and to retain counsel. By protecting the right to a fair and speedy public trial by jury, the idea “Innocent until proven guilty” is protected. No one will be put in jail…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Innocent until proven guilty” is what our judicial system is based on. Not “innocent based on prior convictions”. Basing a verdict on a person’s prior convictions is just unfair. Everyone should be entitled to a fair trial based on evidence gathered that is related to the crime at hand. If suspects continue to be judge on prior convictions it would make it very hard for them to make positives steps forward.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    guilty. Evidence and DNA is all part of the investigation that leads to an arrest. Once evidence is…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    whether a convicted person is guilty or not, rather, that role is assigned to the Court of Appeal.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays