Preview

Prosecutorial Misconduct

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prosecutorial Misconduct
Justice is blind. The very essence of this statement explains it all. True justice doesn’t see wealth, color, or gender. Equality is found in her scales so that her verdict may be fare and balanced. Our Justice System today, as we know it, has moved farther than its predecessor at the start of this nation. Long are we from witch-hunts and people being burned at the stake. Just a few hundred years ago people were summarily executed with little burden of proof and sometimes no trial whatsoever. Over the next five centuries, we evolved in our humanity and the treatment of others. Our founding fathers and those after them continuously worked hard to ensure justice for all by creating documents and laws that would guide us to our known system today. …show more content…
In other words, DAs and ADAs are allowed to take a case to trial, plea it out, and even drop the charges. Accountability in this ethical endeavor is not only essential to the purity of the justice system, it’s vital. If left unchecked, a prosecutor could potentially bend the rules to conform to their own wants and needs in a case. This bending and breaking of the rules is called Prosecutorial Misconduct. Prosecutorial Misconduct is defined as, "An illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate …show more content…
Specifically bribery, extortion, and suppression of evidence; these violations go against the oaths of office that each attorney took when he or she was sworn in to uphold the constitution and its laws. The American Bar Association acts as the regulatory ethics board to monitor and handle complaints against the integrity of an attorney. According to the “Innocence Project” most attorneys responsible for misconduct often go un punished unless the direct evidence exist to prove intent. One such case involved a young man by the name of Timothy. Timothy Brian Cole died in 1999, serving a 25-year sentence for a rape of a Texas Tech University student. The interesting part of this case was he wrote several letters declaring his innocence claiming he didn’t commit the rape. Cole was convicted based on a black and white photo line up where he was identified. Cole was quickly convicted in court with minimal evidence or testimony. Cole maintained his innocence the entire time claiming he was at home studying and no where near the scene of the crime. 10 years later, after the statute of limitations had expired another Texas inmate wrote two letters to the Lubbock Police Department admitting to the rape that Cole was convicted of. These letters went unread. Timothy Cole died in 1999 while in prison. Nearly 20 years after the offense, DNA evidence that was collected from the crime scene was analyzed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One of the cases portraying unethical conduct that affected the accused could be the one of Jeff Pierce who was released in 2009 being found innocent with DNA testing. Pierce had already been serving fifteen years in prison for rape before being found innocent; Pierce had no prior criminal convictions. The Pierce case commenced investigations on many others found guilty with evidence examined by scientist Joyce Gilchrist, the one responsible for providing incomplete and false evidence in Pierce’s case. The FBI examined the cases including pierce’s finding that there were "errors in identification," and that lab notes were "incomplete or inadequate". Pierce even stated that he voluntarily provided hair and blood samples; five minutes later he was told it was a match and that he was going to prison. At trial Gilchrist even stated to jurors that she found dozens of hairs that were consistent and were a positive identification.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to terms of conducting investigations, law enforcement officers were permitted to manipulate and use unjustified tactics to question the suspects. These measures have a strong tendency to eventually forced defendants into admitting a crime, whether the defendant is guilty or not. Moreover, in some scenarios, the prosecutors would even went as far as convicting defendants based on flimsy evidence and purposely overlook the solid proofs that can demonstrate defendants’ innocence. These dishonest prosecutors abandoned their responsibilities to obtain justice and to serve as the lawful agent for the people; instead, they deliberately violate the moral principles of their duties and the rights of the defendants to secure convictions. The usual forms of prosecutorial misconduct include but not restricted to: “coercing false confessions”, “lying or intentionally misleading jurors about their observations”, “failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to prosecutors”, “pressuring defense witnesses not to testify” and etc.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the root of all injustice, whether past or present, is an underlying human selfishness and flawed decision-making ability. For example, in the past, during the Scottsboro Trial of the 1930s, 9 innocent African American teenagers underwent a wrongful accusation and years of suffering in prison simply because of their race. This injustice highlights selfishness because the women who accused these boys of rape were thinking solely about the protection of themselves; not wanting to arrested for being prostitutes, but not thinking about how the false accusation could and would ruin and torture the boys’ lives. In addition, the jury showcased flaws of the human ability to make choices, as they let the social norm and racist bias of the time…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Like Elie Wiesel said, “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.” Elie Wiesel wrote a book about his life during the holocaust. In the book he talks about racism and hatred toward the Jewish religion. This relates to how people are judged at court for their appearance and how they talk or look. People who have a low socioeconomic status are disadvantaged in the criminal justice system especially when examining how they do not have enough money for a good lawyer, they won’t be able to pay off any of their fines and they may or may not have enough money to buy nice clothes for court.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defense attorneys often have to defend clients who are guilty of horrible crimes such as murder, rape, or assault with a deadly weapon. Their job is to defend the client, no matter of what the client actually did; their job is to try and get them off, or get them the minimum punishment. Attorney also have an attorney-client privilege, where the attorney is to keep anything the client tells them a secret, unless it is agreed upon to be used in the trial by both parties; the client and the attorney. So if a client was convicted to 25 years for killing two police officers and then admits to their defense attorney that they committed a third murder of a security guard, the attorney is expected not to relay this…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the prosecutor and the defense attorney are competent of handling ample discretion within their proper duties. The prosecutor could be considered to have appropriate capabilities at their availability which feature fewer restrictions compared to the discretional capabilities of the defense attorney. The prosecutor handles abundant discretion in deciding whether to originally go after a case and immediately charge the accused. They may find what to offer the defense when a plea bargain is settled and have the power to drop and re-file charges when it is appropriate to do so. Prosecutors may be engaged in horizontal prosecution or where there are several prosecutors may be assigned to the case throughout each legal stage, or vertical prosecution, where there will be a single prosecutor following the case through each legal stage (Meyer & Grant, 2003).…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people know that people of color, especially African Americans, were treated quite unfairly around the 1930s - many don’t know, however, that the same horrendous treatment is still present today. In the 1930s, most people held prejudices against those of other races, and those prejudices became known through the decisions of the legal system. Now, it has been about 90 years, and society has yet to make the necessary improvements to counteract the influences of such prejudices on the legal system. True, there have been many changes in the American Legal system over the past years, however, it has not changed drastically enough so as to provide justice to everyone.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One form of racial injustice in court was portrayed in To Kill a Mockingbird. Tom Robinson, a colored man, was convicted of raping and beating a white woman without any evidence besides some lousy witnesses. As said by Atticus in the book, “But this is a truth that applies to the human race and to no particular race of men. There is not a person in this courtroom who has never told a lie, who has never done an immoral thing…” (Harper Lee 47). Without a doubt this is totally correct. We…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts are now being said to be using discrimination when charging and convicting people of crimes. Power has an ability to make people see things in a different light. If a certain race continouly is being placed in front of a judge a judge may then just assume that every time they seem someone of that race in their court room they are automatically guilty because of previous encoutners. An example of this is from The Code of the Street, a man named John Turner was aressested for an illegal firearm, the officers believed John when he gave them his reasoning for having the firearm. He was using it as protection, as there were previous stabbings in his neighborhood. While the officers were sympathic to John, they still had to arrest him. When John apperared in court he did not know that he was supposed to have a lawyer present with him, so he was given a public defender. This public defender, was no help to John at all. He wanted John to lie to the judge and plead not gulity even though John had been completely honest with the…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Money moves the decisions of how trials go. If you have a poor African American on a murder trial, given, if it goes that far, most of the time he would be found guilty even if it were in self-defense. If the defendant were a wealthy white person, the jury would find a way of how it was justified, as it was in the case of State of Florida v. George Zimmerman. He was found not guilty under the stand your…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States criminal justice system prides itself on being fair and just. Even if it is one of the best systems in existence, it is not flawless. Wrongful convictions continue to occur despite existing safeguards aimed at limiting wrongful convictions. According to the Global Registry of Claims of Innocence, approximately 15% of inmates claim to be innocent nationwide (2014). Based on exoneration rates, of the 15% claiming innocence between one and five percent of inmates are truly innocent (Global Registry of Claims of Innocence, 2014). Several factors prevent wrongfully convicted individuals from proving his or…

    • 2617 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When asking for fairness, the desire isn't for more rights for the criminally accused, yet for those rights of the accused to be fairly executed, before they are found guilty or innocent. This being because the system is unfair, it seems to be two different systems: one for the privileged, and one for the less privileged. Cops use methods of investigation and interrogation against minorities and the poor that wouldn't be accepted against more privileged citizens. Courts assign public defenders to the poor in serious criminal trials that a rich person wouldn't hire to defend them in a traffic court. Many minorities walk into a courtroom with the feeling that they are guilty until proven innocent. The complexion of their skin is too often viewed as negative. There is no doubt what the reason for it is.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the police force is doing all they can to resolve the situation, police misconduct is still a major problem in the United States because many innocent people have been wrongfully accused and even died at the hands of careless police officers who abuse their authority. One case claims that “A South Side police commander and his officers tortured black suspects into confessing to crimes they didn’t commit.” (Webber) This is a perfect example as it shows how police were abusing their authority just to make innocent civilians take the blame for something they did not do. This type of behavior by police is absolutely horrendous and wrong. Another example that shows police officers abusing their authority, does not involve a killing…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michelle Alexander talked about how racial bias takes place at every stage of the court process. This process is the sentencing, prosecutions, jury selection, and police racial profiling colored races. (Alexander, 2012). Each of these parts has individual racism that they share and fall under the fourth amendment. Prosecutors have the most power in the court system. (Alexander, p.112, 2012). The type of people in the court system is protected to the claims of racial bias. The jury selection has a long history of race discrimination on juries in the court system. People of color would always get the harsher punishment and sentence. (Alexander, p.106,2012) Since the judges have the most power, many of them make illegal discretion towards the suspects because of their race. This also goes for prosecutors because many of the bring information into the court and base it on the persons race. Jury selection is based on race, which makes the punishments even harsher for certain colored individuals even though a big percentage of them are innocent. In Alexander’s book, she stated how “… And I don’t like the way they looked, with the way the hair is cut, both of them. And the mustaches and the beards look suspicious to me”(p.122, 2012). This shows how many judges are racist and can simply give a colored race a worse punishment just because of their skin color. Another statement that Alexander gave was the mandatory laws were taking discretion of the judge which resulted in racial discrimination when a person is was getting sentenced. This had sentenced many colored races in prisons, which lead to overcrowding court systems, and even prisons. (CJ, presentation). For instance, the judges see a colored person and automatically think that they are guilty of the crime that they are involved in. Some judges do not really listen to what the person has to…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criminal justice system has been altered in several ways to make it a fair system for all races, religions, and genders. Though this was the goal since the beginning, the system has not fully accomplished this. The justice system has become corrupt and incredibly unfair, especially to those of color. People of color are stereotyped and scrutinized excessively during their sentences. There are several cases that show how corrupt the justice system really is. The cases of Adam Bollenback, Brock Turner, and Kalief Browder, have revealed that the “justice” system has failed to be fair and needs to be completely altered in order to be a legitimate way of being sentenced.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays