Preview

Prosecuting Juveniles In Adult Court

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Prosecuting Juveniles In Adult Court
Prosecuting Juveniles in Adult Court

Kimberly Washington

Introduction to Statistics for Criminal Justice
Ayana Conway, Ph.D., Assistant Professor
September 30, 2013

Abstract
This research paper will examine whether or not juveniles that commit violent crimes should be tried as an adult. Through research, I will establish an argument that children who commit the crimes of an adult should be punished as an adult. Data based on experience and observation detailing the number of juvenile offenders that are housed in adult prisons and jails, as well as the number of prisoners serving life sentences that were earned by committing violent crimes before the age of 15 will be included in this research paper. Finally, I suggest that children who commit crimes that are considered violent enough to even be considered for adult criminal court should in fact be tried in that very venue.
Keywords: juveniles, violent crimes, adult prosecution

Prosecuting Juveniles in Adult Court In this paper, I will look at current scholarly thought to determine the effectiveness of trying juveniles as adults in a court of law. In extreme instances, juveniles of a broad range of ages have committed violent crimes that the criminal justice system has determined to be impossible to have been committed by the accepted frame of mind of a juvenile. These juveniles were tried in adult court and sentenced accordingly. The purpose of my research is to examine juveniles who have been tried as adults and to discuss its strengths and weaknesses. I will analyze the information that I gather and will provide a strong case that this practice is appropriate. Many people believe that some crimes are so terrible that the courts should focus on the type of offense and not on the age of the accused. Several authors address the issues surrounding juveniles who are tried as adults (Hudson, 2009; Mason, Chapman, Chang & Simons, 2003; Nunez, Tang, 2003). Hudson (2009) emphasizes



References: Bower, B. (2007, April). Violent justice: adult system fails young offenders. ScienceNews, 171, 243. Bower, B. (2007, November). Crime growth: early mental ills fuel young-adult offending. ScienceNews, 172, 308. Hudson, D. (2009). Adult time for adult crimes. American Bar Association Journal, 95, 139-141. Kupchik, A. (2006). Judging juveniles: prosecuting adolescents in adult and juvenile courts. New York University Press, 243-244. Mason, C., Chapman, D., Chang, S., & Simons, J. (2003) Impacting re-arrest rates among youth sentenced in adult court: an epidemiological examination of the juvenile sentencing advocacy act. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 73. Nunez, N. & Tang, C. (2003). Effect of defendant age and juror bias on judgement of culpability: what happens when a juvenile is tried as an adult? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(1), 239-251. Young, M. C., & Gainsborough, J. (2000). Prosecuting juveniles in adult court: an assessment of trends and consequences. The Sentencing Project, 1-10.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent V America

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If one looks at the background of juvenile crimes, they would find that there has been much development on the trials of adolescents and how they were viewed. Children have been described as the future, the greatest resource, and the hope for a better tomorrow. Children have been viewed as lacking in self-control by many Americans. “ Juveniles in adult institutions are five time more likely to be sexually assaulted, twice as likely to beaten by staff, and fifty percent more likely to be attacked with a weapon than minors in juvenile facilities” (White). They are usually beaten or harassed by hardened, adult criminals. For centuries, criminal youngsters have been on the wrong side of justice. In the 1800’s, the belief was shared by the public that juveniles and adult offenders should be prisoned…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Semple, J. & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Juveniles under the age of 18 will display lower levels of psychosocial maturity than participants aged 18 or 25” (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 60). Steinberg found in an experiment that by the age of 21 participants appeared to be more stabilized in their judgment, indicating that young people may not reach levels of adult maturity until 21, and are developing skills in this domain mostly in the ages from 16 to 19 (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 59). This is to say that before 21 the brain is not stabilized in judgment, therefore when a young person commits a crime their not capable of judging the consequences of their actions like an adult. Research shows that although juveniles understand that their behaviors are considered wrong, due…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the hardest decisions that judges have to make is sentencing a juvenile to be tried as an adult. With the increase in violent crimes in America today, juveniles are often found in the front line of media for violent crimes. Within society as a whole, those who are under the age of 18 years old do not function as adults, which is why the law protects children from the consequences of their actions. With the harshness and severity of crimes committed by juveniles…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past years Juveniles have been fighting in court for being tried as adults. Many people agree or disagree on that decision, are they Juveniles, Children, or they adults? Writers like Adam Liptak, Marjie Lundstrom, Greg Krikorian, and Paul Thompson have maelstrom the ways of the mind of teenagers or consider their committed crimes to be adjured. The things that go through a teen’s brain are starting and unbearable to hear or imagine. Between the ages of 12 through 17, minors have been committing crimes that make their way down to death row. They look at juveniles on how unreliable and inconsistent they are on making bad decisions. But often minors bring unparticular brutally attracting impulsive claims on their behalf’s on their crimes.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One hundred years ago, the Illinois legislature enacted the Illinois Juvenile Court Act (1899 Ill. Laws 132 et seq.), creating the first separate juvenile court. The policy debates raging around the country in this centennial year(1899), however, make it uncertain whether the traditional juvenile court will prevail. Early in the 19th century, juveniles were tried along with adults in criminal courts. In common law, children under age 7 were conclusively presumed immune from prosecution because they lacked moral responsibility (the infancy defense). Children between ages 7 and 14 were presumed not to be criminally responsible, and prosecutors had to prove that an individual juvenile was culpable. Youth age 14 and older were deemed as responsible for their criminal acts as adults.…

    • 2453 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile incarceration has created a lot of uncertainties in the legal justice system. This is because it is often assumed that indeed there are several persons that are underage that at the time of the crime did not have the proper mental reasoning to appreciate that indeed they were committing a crime. For this reason, there has been several problems regarding Juvenile incarceration and it has been argued that there is a need to re-evaluate and ensure that indeed the problems that affect the system are given the proper judicial involvement and justice. . This paper is going to examine how different it is from adults and juvenile when it comes to…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Broken Juvenile Justice System.” Baltimore Sun. N.p., 06 Aug. 2012. Web. 20 Mar. 2013 http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-08-06/news/bs-ed-juvenile-jail-editorial-20120806_1_million-juvenile-jail-adult-facility-youthful-offenders…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles should not be tried as adults as their brains are still developing, their childhood may have been abusive, and there are cost effective alternatives. The court officials and judges should take into consideration of the various underlying factors of youths committing crime. Getting rid of mandatory life sentences is necessary and juveniles should be placed into rehabilitation programs instead. Children will be future leaders and the future is in their hands, therefore, society has to lead them on the right path. Locking a mere child into a cage and throwing away the key is not the right way to go, rather steps should be taken to ensure their safety and allow them the chance to remedy their behavior because prison won’t provide the guidance they need. With help, juveniles will mature and become responsible…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying Juveniles

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trying juveniles has been a topic to the public we hear about in the judustrial system. It contains a lot of arguments which has its pros and cons. Considering being a juvenile delinquent you must commit a crime that is under the age of 18. Prosecutors can charge juveniles as adults when they are suspected of violent offenses or crime. Back in time when this happened, this treatment involved the death penalty. As of today it involves being prosecuted through adult courts and incarcerated in the adult jails and prisons. Addressing this topic is important because society is not aware what happened or what is happening to juveniles being tried as adults. After reading this paper, you will learn different offenses juveniles commit and why it leads to being tried as adults. You will know how the death penalty came in effect, ended, and the different cases that happened between times. I will talk about juveniles being prosecuted through adult courts and the benefit of it. Also juveniles being incarcerated with adults and the risks they face. My intention of writing this paper is to get you to know the research I gained from it, and hoping it interest you to do more research on it too. Do convicting a juvenile as adults helps stop crime.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    juvenile justice

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Juszkiewicz, J. (2000). Youth Crimes/Adult Time: Is Justice Served? Prepared by Pretrial Services Resource Center, for Building Blocks for Youth.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adult Crime, Adult Time

    • 743 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A good argument needs not only logic and clear evidence, but also the establishment of a personal connection to the reader. In 1998, the Washington Post article “ Adult Crime, Adult Time” by Linda J.Collier is a well-created problem solution argument that almost fits this definition of a good argument. In this article, Collier argues that children who knowingly engage in adult conduct and crime should be punished as adults. Overall I agree with Collier’s argument that juveniles should be tried as adults and how the system is doing a poor job because she establishes herself as an authority on the topic of how the number of juvenile crimes increase, and why the juvenile justice laws should be revamped. She presents a logical argument that punishing kids as adults is rational , and she shares cases that make the readers empathize with the juvenile criminals.…

    • 743 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays