Pros And Cons Of Pre Tribulation
The Essential Arguments of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture
Following are 25 salient apologetics for the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. While only a few of these are powerful enough to sway the argument in and of themselves, these arguments taken in their entirety present an overwhelming body of reason that is not easily (and certainly not logically) contraverted. Although there still remain a few problem passages which are not interpreted easily, it must be remembered that proper hermeneutics neither builds a doctrine on isolated scriptures, nor discards truth taught clearly based on these same isolated scriptures.
1. The literal method of biblical interpretation
All other methods must spiritualize either the entire tribulation period into historical events, or must at the very least spiritualize the specific prophecies of the first 3 ½ years of the tribulation to make room for the rapture at some period during the tribulation.
2. The nature of the seventieth week
Wrath Revelation 6:16-17, 11; 18, 14:19, 15:1,7, 16:1,19 1 Thessalonians 1:9-10, 5:9, Zephaniah 1:15, 18
Judgement Revelation 14:7, 15:4, 16:5-7, 19:2
Indignation Isaiah 26:20-21, 34:1-3
Punishment Isaiah 24:20-21
Hour of Trial Revelation 3:10
Hour of Trouble Jeremiah 30:7
Destruction Joel 1:15
Darkness Joel …show more content…
All who are saved must be saved to a position in the body of Christ as indicated in Colossians 1:26-29, Ephesians 2:14-22, 3:1-7. During the seventieth week, the church must be absent, for out of the saved remnant in Israel God seals 144,000 Jews, 12,000 from each tribe according to Revelation 7:14. The fact that God is again dealing with Israel in this national relationship, setting them apart to national identities, and sending them as special representatives to the nations in place of the witness of the church, indicates that the church must no longer be on
Following are 25 salient apologetics for the Pre-Tribulation Rapture position. While only a few of these are powerful enough to sway the argument in and of themselves, these arguments taken in their entirety present an overwhelming body of reason that is not easily (and certainly not logically) contraverted. Although there still remain a few problem passages which are not interpreted easily, it must be remembered that proper hermeneutics neither builds a doctrine on isolated scriptures, nor discards truth taught clearly based on these same isolated scriptures.
1. The literal method of biblical interpretation
All other methods must spiritualize either the entire tribulation period into historical events, or must at the very least spiritualize the specific prophecies of the first 3 ½ years of the tribulation to make room for the rapture at some period during the tribulation.
2. The nature of the seventieth week
Wrath Revelation 6:16-17, 11; 18, 14:19, 15:1,7, 16:1,19 1 Thessalonians 1:9-10, 5:9, Zephaniah 1:15, 18
Judgement Revelation 14:7, 15:4, 16:5-7, 19:2
Indignation Isaiah 26:20-21, 34:1-3
Punishment Isaiah 24:20-21
Hour of Trial Revelation 3:10
Hour of Trouble Jeremiah 30:7
Destruction Joel 1:15
Darkness Joel …show more content…
All who are saved must be saved to a position in the body of Christ as indicated in Colossians 1:26-29, Ephesians 2:14-22, 3:1-7. During the seventieth week, the church must be absent, for out of the saved remnant in Israel God seals 144,000 Jews, 12,000 from each tribe according to Revelation 7:14. The fact that God is again dealing with Israel in this national relationship, setting them apart to national identities, and sending them as special representatives to the nations in place of the witness of the church, indicates that the church must no longer be on