Preview

Pros And Cons Of Lupeol Safe

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Lupeol Safe
Is Lupeol safe

It would appear that lupeol shows no toxic effects at reasonable levels in mice. No adverse effects have yet been seen, and research is still at an early stage. We currently have no long term human use studies to base any assumptions on, nevertheless I'm sure we'll start seeing those pretty quickly.

I have to stress that many of the studies on lupeol are conducted either in the lab (in-vitro) or in the murine model (in mice) and don't necceserily mean these effects will be translated into human results. However, the studies are very bullish and the results hugely positive.

Almost all of the studies I have read go on to conclude that lupeol warrents further investigation and mention the very strong possibilities of lupeol

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The director of Healy’s R&D division strongly recommends further testing in the laboratory for side-effects of this chemical on other insects, birds, animals, plants, and even humans.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Math 221 Week 6 Ilab

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (Note: Your labs should be well organized, with results clearly identified and in the proper order. When answering questions, be sure to use complete sentences and proper grammar. It is also important for you to fully explain your answers! Please do not answer “yes” (or “no”); you should explain why the answer is “yes”. **REMOVE THIS NOTE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING**)…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second study was conducted by Chan, Madaio, and Shlomchik (1999) using the same methods of curing lupus; however, the study used animals instead of humans. Although they used…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    around 50 studies in the last 50 years and his results showed about only half of the…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lupus can be difficult to overcome, and not everybody is open to the idea of filling their bodies with harmful medications that they know nothing about. If you find yourself seeking out natural alternatives for treating this disease, we have your back! Read on to discover all of the options for alternative medication there is to choose from!…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    little and it should not be accepted as fact. New findings are promising in that they provide new…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is more true that there are more accurate ways to help the development of medicine other than animal testing. Some evidence to prove this reason is that 70% of drugs that can cause human birth defects in humans are safe in pregnant monkeys (33 Reasons Why Animal Testing Is Pointless).…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We know it has a bad effect on mice because all the mice that were forced to eat the various types of human and animal fecces/ poop died exactly 1 hour after ingesting the nasty poop.A case has been made where a mother of a son who participated in this very stupid and dumb experiment died went to court and the mother lost acording to the libertysos lastanes news paper in a forbineded island. The mother did not win due to the document signed bt the sun saying that he aggreed that whatever happend to him during the test was his own fault and guess what the foolish boy actualy signed that document.But unfourtunetly the the lab mice can noat be used for any experiments because th e court said it was bad bad bad bad bad real bad animal crualty i mean they have to pay the apet store of which they owe it millions and trillion and a bazillion dollars. Ha look what you broght on your self you are freaky cowards . I meani expect kids to do animal cruelty but adults who aactualy know the law . or atleast they are supposed to know how very…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A total of 831 drugs are known to interact with Latuda (lurasidone). 70 major drug interactions, 759 moderate drug interactions and 2 minor drug interactions. The disadvantages of taking Latuda are that there is increased mortality in elderly patients with Dementia-Related…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been many others, such as oraflex causing liver failure, flenac causing liver failure as well, butazolidin liver disease as well as bone marrow disease, cylert causing liver failure in children and even death, rezulin caused liver failure, propulsid caused over 300 deaths in children due to unnatural heart rhythms, inocor caused heart failure, and baycol caused fatal muscle wasting. All at a point where proven to be safe when they were tested on animals, but ended up being harmful to humans. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that 92 percent of drugs tested and were shown to be safe and effective on animals failed in human trials due to them being unsafe or ineffective . John J. Pippin, M.D., and Kristie Stoick, M.P.H., state, “According to some estimates, adverse drug reactions are responsible for 2.2 million hospitalizations and 106,000 deaths annually.” In making this comment, Pippin and Stoick argue that animal testing isn’t always reliable with the results they get from animals and how the animal reacts to a drug so when a human uses the new drug which is made to seem to be harmless humans end up with horrible side effects sometimes even leading to death.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The counter argument was proof that this chemical is actually not safe to use, it can make a person sicker than presumed. Jeffery Smith stated:…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It should not surprise you to learn that medical researchers adopted randomized comparative experiments only slowly—many doctors think they can tell “just by watching” whether a new therapy helps their patients. Not so. There are many examples of medical treatments that became popular on the basis of one-track experiments and were shown to be worth no more than a placebo when some skeptic tried a randomized comparative experiment. One search of the medical literature looked for therapies studied both by proper comparative trials and by trials with “historical controls.” A…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Animal Testing

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Economist article, “Be Nice to Mice… Animal Testing,” notes that only one in every ten drugs tested on animals actually works on humans. This is because they are fed a lot to keep their bodies warm since they are kept in cool conditions. The cool conditions are said to keeps their temper at bay. But eating as much as they do alters the way they metabolize the drug. There are many different factors that are involved that make animal testing results difficult to translate into a hypothesis for what human results would be. James-Enger, author of Vegetarian Times article “Beyond Animal Testing,” states that using animals to predict how humans will react to the same drug or medical treatment is not a good experiment due to the difference in anatomy between humans and animals. Even testing animals with similar DNA, like chimpanzees, is not a good test because they do not react the same way as humans. For example, chimps, being our closest relatives, still did not contract AIDS when introduced to the HIV virus (Kelly). Another faulty test occurred when testing a drug called fenphen. Animals showed no serious side effects, but when tested on humans it caused heart-valve defects and was taken off the market (Kelly). There are quite a few recalls due to the inaccuracy of animal experimentation. It has also been prevalent that many tests have been over tested for no…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In low doses it is thought to be associated with an improvement in sporting performance, increased alertness and reduction in fatigue potentially lifting a person’s mood.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics