Preview

Pros And Cons Of Fracking

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Fracking
William Fralin
Library research paper Fracking-pros and cons

Fracking has become a hotly debated issue across the United States.
Fracking industry leaders highlight the benefits of Fracking. Health officials are concerned with the lack of long term use of chemicals in Fracking. Environmental groups protest the lack of regulations and the effects Fracking will have on the environment. Fracking, or Hydraulic fracturing is the process of breaking up shale underneath the earth’s surface to extract natural gas supplies.
A series of holes are drilled and chemicals are pumped in to fracture the pockets of gas within the shale, releasing the gas to the surface. The U.S Energy Information Administration projects that
…show more content…
The potential harms from hydrofracking are serious, and some would be irreversible.
At the same time, the economic benefits to be derived from hydrofracking are substantial. Thus, public debate has focused on the value, safety, and wisdom of allowing hydrofracking, and has divided many communities along economic lines.(Kassotis et al., 2014)
References
Allen, D. T. (2014). Atmospheric emissions and air quality impacts from natural gas production and use. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 5(1)
Kargbo, D. M., Wilhelm, R. G., & Campbell, D. J. (2010). Natural gas plays in the marcellus shale: Challenges and potential opportunities. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(15), 5679-5684. doi:10.1021/es903811p [doi]
Kassotis, C. D., Tillitt, D. E., Davis, J. W., Hormann, A. M., & Nagel, S. C. (2014). Estrogen and androgen receptor activities of hydraulic fracturing chemicals and surface and ground water in a drilling-dense region. Endocrinology, 155(3), 897-907. doi:10.1210/en.2013-1697

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marcellus Shale is a geologic formation containing natural gas that stretches across much of the Eastern U.S., from New York to Tennessee. It has been a topic of hot debate over the past few years and continues to be a point of contention between landowners, governments, institutions, and private companies, even earning the attention of President Obama in his 2012 State of the Union speech. While geologists have known of the Marcellus Shale for years, early estimates of the amount of natural gas contained within it were fairly low. However, the use of the hydraulic fracturing (hydrofracking) drilling technique has dramatically increased the amount of natural gas that is recoverable (Geology.com). Current estimates suggest that reserves in the Marcellus Shale could meet U.S. energy demand for six years (Buurma, 2012).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the process in which the fracking solution is forced into the ground at high pressures, occasionally toxic fluids can leak out from the system and contaminate nearby drinking water. Environmental studies have concluded that methane concentrations are seventeen times higher in drinking water wells near fracturing sites. There are at least 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to fracking areas as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water. Up to six hundred chemicals are used in the fluid solution they send into the ground, including carcinogens and toxins such as uranium, methanol, mercury, hydrolic acid, ethylene, glycol, and formaldehyde. When they bring the fracturing fluid back up after fracturing the shale rocks, to release the natural gas, only thirty to fifty percent of it is recovered. The waste solution recovered is then left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They are concerned that millions of gallons of contaminated wastewater are produced from fracking methods and that there are currently no facilities operating to remove these pollutants. When separated by a mile or more from groundwater sources and the earth’s surface, the ancient marine waters along with naturally existing toxic compounds are not an issue, but “Fracking disturbs, distributes, and carries upward with the fracked gas ‘produced waters’ containing radioactive materials, heavy metals, hydrocarbons such as BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and toluene [sic.]), bromide, highly concentrated salts, and many other organic and inorganic compounds that, when exposed to our environment, are dangerous health hazards—many are known as carcinogens and toxic to biological life” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). Which brings up the question of why can’t they use less toxic chemicals in the fracking process? Tracy Carluccio, the Deputy Director of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, continues by stating, “even if companies were to switch to ‘green’, ‘non-toxic’ fracking fluids, drilling and fracking in these deep formations will always deliver potentially deadly chemical hazards, even in a perfectly regulated world” (Carluccio “Destroying Our Groundwater” Para. 1). The cement and steel casings used in combination with the methods for sealing post-production gas wells do not confine the methane along with other dangerous gases and contaminated fluids that are pressurized within the aquifer.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kovats, S., Depledge, M., Haines, A., Fleming, L.E., Wilkinson, P., Shonkoff, S.B. & Scovronick, N. 2014, "The health implications of fracking", The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9919, pp. 757-8.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    will be, policy must be put in place to ensure the potential damage to local communities is…

    • 3245 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now this all sounds very nice, but fracking is one of the most debated topics recently out of following reasons: It takes an immense amounts of water, it poses the…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hydraulic Fracturing or fracking was first introduced in 1940s and has then been a key provider of natural gas and oil worldwide. Despite its expansion and customary use, fracking still poses many health and environmental concerns. During fracking, pressurized liquids are injected into drilled wells, which cause the surrounding rock to crack open allowing gas and oil flow through the fissures. Millions of gallons of water are used and a similarly large volume of waste water is generated. Most of the water is never restored and the stored waste water and fracking fluid can adversely affect the animals and vegetation around it. Along with the water, other chemicals are injected into the ground as far as 10,000 feet below the surface and enter groundwater, polluting drinking sources for many. Fracking may be a key provider of oil but this expensive, polluting, low energy-return process is not worth the loss of wildlife habitat, natural land and innumerable water resources.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the U.S., there are more than 500,000 active natural gas wells. Each of these wells requires 400 tanker tucks in order to carry water as well as supplies to the site where fracking will occur. For each of these individual fracking jobs, 1 to 8 million gallons of water is used. About 40,000 gallons of chemicals (per one fracturing job) are used and mixed with the water to create the "fracking fluid." What people do not know, is that up to 600 different chemicals are used in this "fracking fluid," including known toxins and carcinogens such as lead, mercury, uranium, ethylene glycol, radium, methanol, hydrachloric acid, and formaldehyde. These chemicals are known to cause cancer and other health problems. 72 trillion gallons of water and 360 billion gallons of these cancerous chemicals are needed to run our current gas wells.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Pros And Cons

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hydraulic fracturing, also termed hydrofracturing, hydrofracking, or simply fracking, is hotly debated for its economic and environmental impacts. Fracking is the process by which rock is fractured by a pressurized fluid containing water. chemicals and sand to access natural gas, petroleum and brine from great depths of the Earth’s surface. Fracking produces the economic benefit of more accessible hydrocarbons, not to mention the 2.5 million fracking related jobs that were recorded in 2012 worldwide, one million of which were in the United States alone (FracFocus: ECHO-EPA Violations). However, many fear the environmental effects. Risks include ground and surface water contamination, air and noise pollution, and an increase in seismic activity. Hazards to public health and the environment are yet to be discovered, because the first commercial application did not begin until the late 1940’s; however, hydraulic fractures have been recorded naturally throughout time (The Truth about…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's a Fracking Problem

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fracking is increasing in the U.S., but with this increase of natural gas comes an increase of safety concerns. The process of hydraulic fracking requires chemicals that can affect the families that live nearby. These chemicals also affect the environment on the land and in the air. With fracking there comes its positives and its negatives, some good and some bad. There are very few regulations on how fracking can be done, but in the regulations there isn't much help. Fracking for natural gas needs to be further regulated before it can continue.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Pros And Cons

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hydraulic fracking for some is a dream come true. For others, it is a nightmare. The act of extracting oil and natural gas from shale rock layers from within the earth has environmentalists pulling out their hair and politicians jumping for joy. The contamination of groundwater, air and land is constantly being brought up in debates. The government on the other hand argues that it only causes minimal harm and the benefits, like job creation and individual wealth, far out way the cost.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Water is one of our important resources that were given to us by mother nature. We see water as a source for survival and many more advantages. It's fragile, and the smallest amount of contaminants could ruin it for a population, yet one of the major ingredients in fracking processes is the water. Reports of accidents involving water contamination are everywhere. The basic process of fracking is its uses of incredible amounts of gallons of water per drill and drilling so close to groundwater sources risk contamination. "Accidents have already been documented and citizen's well waters have been tainted with toxic chemicals", according to the Climate Progress. (Foster) Many of the chemicals used in the fracking process are proven toxins. These include benzene, ethyl-benzene, toluene, xylene, naphthalene, and other hazardous chemicals that are harmful if any contact is made.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hydraulic Fracking

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2000, shale beds provided 1 percent of America’s natural gas supply. Today, that figure stands at nearly 25 percent. Most of that population increase is due to the growing popularity of hydraulic fracturing. With the enticing specter of energy independence in the balance, some have argued that such efforts to recover gas need to be expanded. While some activists believe that fracking’s potential environment hazards view the process as a serious threat. Water makes up a high percentage of fracking fluid that fluid also flows back up the well, and is stored in open pits until it can be sent to a treatment plant. A variable amount of fracking fluid remains in the ground after a well has run dry. Fracking is known to produce airborne pollutants like methane, benzene, and sulfur oxide. The EPA has recently targeted this pollution and plans to set strict guidelines to reduce it.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Effects

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fracking, also referred to as fracturing or drilling, is the process of drilling 5,000 to 20,000 feet into the earth and applying hydraulic pressure to the surrounding area until it cracks. The target area for oil and gas drilling companies is in the shale, a soft layer of sedimentary rock broken apart by using a mixture of 98% water and 2% chemicals. These chemicals range from household cleansers to toxic chemicals, and is added to nearly 4 million gallons of water per drilling well. By using this mixture and pressure the shale is cracked releasing gas and oil reserves trapped inside. Fracking has been proven to cause earthquakes, producing a high of 4 on the Richter scale, toxic water supply, and…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counter arguments against hydraulic fracturing include the lack of government regulations, and environmental issues. While most energy companies are conscientious and put forth every effort to make fracking safe, without oversight, some companies are reeking havoc on communities, individuals, and nature. John Rumpler, Senior Attorney for Environment America, says those taking advantage of unrestricted production are responsible for complaints of coercion, contaminated drinking water, flammable well water, physical illnesses of those living close to sites, noise pollution, death of domestic animals and wildlife, and destruction of pristine landscapes (Bambrick). Consequently, the 2005 Energy Policy Act made fracking exempt from the Clean Water…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays