Preview

Pros And Cons Of Federalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Federalism
Federalism is an interesting topic. The US Government has made marijuana use illegal. The state of Colorado has decided to make it legal, for not just medical use but for recreational use as well. This is an example of Federalism. This can definitely make things difficult for the federal government. According to the articles we read for this assessment, Colorado legalizing marijuana is becoming an issue mostly because of its surrounding states. The article, written by Reisert, states, “now that Colorado has made pot so easily available, they are arresting, convicting and incarcerating many more people for drug violations,” (Reisert, 2015). Colorado’s neighboring states are seeing the effects of legalized marijuana. The article states that the surrounding states feel like “Colorado’s state government is …show more content…
The article, by Reisert, states that it is unlikely that the federal government will take back the law Colorado has instated, (Reisert, 2015). It is examples like these that make the idea of Federalism stand out.
According to the website, US History, Federalism has both pros and cons. Some pros of federalism are that it allows issues like tyranny to be less avoidable, and that individual state needs can be met, (US History, n.d.). Some disadvantages, stated in the article, is that things are not fast and efficient anymore, (US History, n.d.). The website also stated that states are more likely to argue, which goes perfectly with the two articles we had to read for class.
Obviously, like most things pertaining to the government, there are pros and cons. One of the biggest issues that seemed to arise with the legalization of marijuana was stated in the article written by Trever Hughes. The article states that, “harder drugs, like heroin and meth, have followed the increase in marijuana availability,” (Hughes, 2014). Now these may be issues, there are also pros to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marijuana Controversy

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marijuana is not being looked at as a harmful illegal drug, rather it is beginning to be looked at as helpful. Since the first state legalized cannabis, the rise in usage has gone up drastically. A major reason to this growth in usage…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With Federalism does anyone really know who is in charge? Sure it allows the state to have its own government and rules but the Federal Government can deny the states decisions. Doesn’t the Federal Government really have the final say, and if they want to allow something to some extent they can put stipulations on it. Federalism is here to stay.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do believe the policy is consistent with federalism. I have no problem with the federal government giving power to the states to set…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State constitutions, however, tend to show deviation from the structure of federal rule maintained by the U.S. Constitution. In the case of the Nevada State Constitution, there is ample evidence that this document sets forth a policy of law that is far more “democratic” in tone and in application than the Constitution. There are strong similarities between the two documents. Both, for example, stress the rights of the citizenry and even focus on issues such as the “right to assemble” and the citizenry’s ability to refuse to quarter citizens in their homes upon order from the government. Yet when the workings of the legislative, executive, and judicial systems are investigated, it is clear that Nevada’s state constitution deviates dramatically from the U.S. Constitution. While both share these three separate designations of political power, and while there is the unstated intention that these branches are intended to keep the other within check, there are differences which suggest a greater degree of democratic control over each area therein.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism breaks down what National , State and local governments can and cannot do. Like the national government and only the National government has the power to tax,make treaties,coin money,establish post offices,raise a military,declare war,admit new states,build dams,interstate highways,Fund…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federal government has powers that are more general and apply to the country as a whole, while the state government has powers specific to their area. According to Madison in Federalist Paper #51 written in 1788, federalism guards against tyranny because, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Document A) They are able to control their separate areas of government while still controlling the power of the other, ensuring that the other does not accumulate too much power and turn the country into a…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1970s regulated federalism began to build up steam as for how our new form of federalism would operate. In this new method, of regulated federalism, congress would pass laws requiring states and localities to follow through with out a choice or say in the matter. This is contrast to cooperative federalism as the federal government did not directly force states and localities to follow through, but if they did not they would not receive government grants and funding in that certain area. However, the government did have good reason for this practice, they wanted to create more unity and uniformity between the states, “The effect of these national standards is that state and local policies in the areas of environmental protection, social services, and education are more uniform from coast to coast than are other nationally funded policies”(WTP 94).…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    States and the federal government are run by the idea of Dual Federalism. Dual Federalism is defined Lenz (n.d.) “by the idea that the national and state governments had power over different areas of public policy, and that each level of government was supreme in its field.” States can also flex their use…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Essay On Tyranny

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The system of many states united under one government but still remain independent on problems within their state is called federalism; which preserves our country from tyranny. “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments,” says James Madison in Federalist Paper #51(Doc A). Madison is referring to the state and national government. The system of federalism allows the national government to partially control and unify the states, and yet the states still…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In this congressional legislature, a bare majority of votes can enact commercial laws; … create the most oppressive monopoly upon the five Southern States, whose circumstances and productions are essentially different from those of theirs, although not a single man of these voters are the representatives of, or amenable to, the people of the Southern States. “…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism Paper Reviw

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author contrasts the different federalism characteristics discussed. Confused and competitive interactions occur between federal, state and local government with attendant impacts on service delivery. In particular much of the dysfunction in the current system stems from uncertainty around roles and an argumentative approach to dividing resources and defining responsibility.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalism is defined as “the federal principle or system of government”. This concept of “federalism” is explored in Lowi et al and Zimmerman. These two sources list and define two types of federalism. The first type they list is dual federalism, the second one is cooperative federalism. One of the most distinctive differences between the two is how the powers of the national and state governments are defined, this ties into the classic struggle of Founding Fathers: How should power be separated between the states and the national government? Both of these systems are used in our Constitution, however, I believe our current situation in the United States best fits under the system of cooperative federalism. These concepts I will explore in…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This was known as Regulated federalism. At this stage, there was even further intervention in the management of local programs and resources by the national government. The national government demanded to have more control by threatening to eliminate grants for certain programs. The state governments were given categorical grants whose discretion remained in the hands of national government. Such programs include grants given to fight national poverty. The ills that state governments seemed unable to handle were taken up by the national government. Such grants included money for urban renewal, education, and job training. In another example, the national government demanded that state governments regulate speed limits within states. Failure to do this would lead to the withdrawal of transport sector funding. At this time, the Supreme Court reduced the powers that the state government held while increasing national government…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism in the United States has had several different concepts throughout our history. Dual federalism ran until around the Great Depression of the 1930s. Dual federalism has very distinct and rather clear lines of power for the national government as well as the state or local level of government. At times, it is referred to as “layered cake”. The national level very distinct and rule over much smaller, local, or state governments. There is a balance of power between the two, each maintains sovereignty that should not impact the other. Both national and state should work together, but still question the other to operate effetely. Dual federalism for This Nation seemed to cause more tension between the national and state levels than anything else. McCulloch v. Maryland is an early example of dual federalism. When the state of Maryland argues that the U.S. Constitution did not give the national government the power to make a National Bank since it was not an enumerated power and was unconstitutional. However, the court concluded that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that if the end goal is legitimate than what the national government is trying to do is constitutional.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now let’s move on to creative federalism, which had a direct link to federal and local government, making it a weaker state form. Now for current federalism, the new federalism or competitive federalism. New federalism, is an overall competition of the governments in their relationships, making an overall competitive government. The many disadvantages of federal government can be summed up with it allowing inequality between states, in history it protected segregation and even slavery, and the blockage of national policies by the state. Federalism works for what it is, do I think states should have more power? Sure, but, knowing how people see their government on a state level It could be implosive. A check and balance system will always be a more logical concept then, either having…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays