Preview

Pros And Cons Of Abolishing Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Abolishing Death Penalty
Abolishing the death penalty “You can release an innocent man from prison, but you can’t release him from the grave.” Stated by Freddie Lee Pitts, who was exonerated from death row after being falsely accused. Many people think that prisoners who have committed heinous crimes should face the death penalty for the crimes they committed. Since in the publics’ eyes it’s more cost efficient, the majority of people on death row were the actual offenders, and it is the only way for the victim’s family to seek justice. In reality it cost more than life in prison. Statistics show that more than four people every year are found innocent unfortunately for some prisoner it was to late after they been executed. And this type of cruel and unusual punishment …show more content…
Having criminals in death row violates many amendments in the constitution such as the eighth Amendment that forbids the cruel and unusual punishments. Since they have to get three lethal injections in front of a crowd of at least twelve people that might include victims and criminal family among a pointed people from the state. I believe criminals should pay for their crimes but in the most humane and legal way that doesn't violet any type of law. So if were trying to enforce the law for the crimes people have committed, we should also respect the laws in the way we sentence people to draw a line from right and wrong and that why the death penalty should be abolished In conclusion after knowing all that is wrong with the death penalty we should rethink of a better way to sentence people that doesn't make us the real criminals for allowing the death penalty to continue that is inhumane, a real cost burden to everybody and an unlawful practice. My suggestion is to completely forbid the death penalty and instead make them serve life in prison for the heinous crimes they committed. The world would be a better place if we all decided that the practice of lethal injection is a barbaric method to make people pay for their crimes and it should be outlawed in today modern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Such mistakes that have been made must be prevented for the future, so that the innocent don 't continue to suffer. In fact, the Innocence Project, an organization that emphasizes the faults in our death penalty system, states that the inmates falsely accused of their crimes "...were convicted in 11 states and served a combined 209 years in prison – including 187 years on death row – for crimes they didn’t commit." (Innocence Project). To be exonerated after years and years must leave unfathomable mental trauma. If that many innocent people have been forced to wait on the edge of death for this long, it wouldn 't be hard to believe that some won 't be lucky enough to be saved from the mistakes of our unacceptably inefficient court system. Killing a person, even sentencing them to death, is only just if they truly deserve it. That is what Dexter argues, yet our country continues to ineffectively implicate capital punishment by making the innocent suffer through unnecessary torture. We must end capital punishment, or at least make it more efficient. There are lives at…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate on the pros and cons of the death penalty has gone on for decades. There are some people who oppose the death penalty because they fell it is a system that is so flawed that it serves no purpose. For instance, those against the death penalty believe that this sentence has the potential for an error because it is possible that the wrong person can be executed. Unfortunately, there is no way for those who decide who is guilty to always be 100 percent accurate.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patricia Cornwell once said “First of all, it does not deter crime, the death penalty.” So why was it made in the first place? Well, many believe that with this system we can eliminate atrocious criminals such as Timothy McVeigh, a young man who bombed Oklahoma City taking the lives of 168 people, who was later executed. This definitely helps in removing that one criminal, but what about the other thousands? If the death penalty were enforced in Canada then it not only do so but also increase our taxes, put innocent lives at risk, and in all reality have no effect on murder rates. Why would you want to let such a problematic sentencing be legalized in such a fine country like ours.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros to the death penalty are that it protects innocent people and that the death penalty serves as a deterrent. Sentencing convicted murderers with the death penalty we are protecting inmates, guards, and people outside the prison. If we do not sentence convicted murderers with the death penalty and instead sentence them with life we are giving them the opportunity to murder while in prison. A statistic shows that by executing convicted murderers we are saving from three to eighteen innocent lives. The death penalty serves as a deterrent because without the death penalty there would be a lot more murderers. This is so because a lot of people do not commit murder in fear of the death penalty and those who have committed murder would…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murder is defined as the killing of one human being by another. Murderers should receive the death penalty, unless self-defense was a following factor. The killing of an innocent human being should never be something someone gets away with; no one should have to right to live after taking the life of another. However, the death penalty is known to be a “lethal lottery” and is applied at random. Therefore, I believe separate institutions should be constructed throughout the United States to separate average criminals from murderers.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every convicted felon waiting on death row costs the American people over nine million dollars yearly to imprison. Such an absurd amount of money should be spent on the rehabilitation of these troubled individuals rather than in prolonging their lives only for their own demise. Before reverting to the early philosophy of Hammurabi “an eye for an eye” America should look to its own foundation, the constitution, as well as compare the costs and benefits of such a policy being legal. Despite enormous protections offered by the federal and states constitutions throughout the United States, many people have been executed in spite of evidence of their innocence. When capital punishment is concerned, most Americans believe our criminal system is close to infallible. Many assume that if factual errors do occur at trial, they will be discovered and corrected by higher courts. People believe that the innocent are rarely wrongly convicted and they are certainly not executed. Unfortunately, there is a large numbers of innocents people who…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals. Maintaining each death row prisoner cost the taxpayers ninety thousand more per year than a prisoner in a general population. Getting rid of people on death row will save taxpayers a lot more money. It could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals and to keep the less violent criminals in for longer. Getting rid of people who are on a life sentence or on death row will save taxpayers a lot of money which could be spent on other things in…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bern Death Penalty

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First, I will discuss the moral issue that is paramount with this topic. Is capital punishment a system that falls in line with the very foundation of this nation due to the glaring fact that many are wrongfully sent to death row. According to (deathpenalty.org), approximately 140 have been exonerated from death row since 1973. That is 140 who were convicted and sentenced to be executed and were later found to be innocent. These exonerations will result from any number of reasons ranging from everyday corruption to new evidence being produced after the fact. Sadly, another very common reason is poor representation in court that results from the defendant being unable to afford a competent lawyer. This single statistic bares to mind the very important question of how many innocent people may have been wrongfully executed in the same period of time. The quantity of known mistakes combined with this uncorrectable concern renders capital punishment an ineffective deterrent from the committing of capital crimes. To avoid the execution of an innocent person, there must be a better system.…

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major purpose of the death penalty is to punish people for their horrible crimes. However, the death penalty has put many innocent people on death row. Since 1973, 156 people have been exonerated (released from death row/evidence shows they aren’t guilty). The average time between getting the death sentence and exoneration is about 11 years. This is already terrible, forcing innocent people to believe that their life is nearly over, because of a crime that they didn’t commit, but it gets worse. It is very likely that people living in the United States have been wrongly executed. Multiple cases have evidence that proves that the “criminal” is actually innocent. In 1991, the house of Cameron Todd Willingham was destroyed by a fire, killing the three children who were sleeping inside. Willingham escaped and his wife was shopping at the time. Prosecutors stated that Willingham had purposefully set the house on fire to cover up the abuse of his children. He was executed by lethal injection in 2004. However, there is a proof that shows that the fire was not caused by Willingham. Unfortunately, nothing can be done now because these people have already been executed, but it does teach us one thing: If the death penalty cannot be used to punish the real offender and risks the lives of innocent people in the process, it can’t be used by our…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a cruel and barbaric way to stop crime. Most kids have heard the expression “do not fight fire with fire.” Using the death penalty is doing just that. Punishing criminals for murder by doing exactly what landed them in jail in the first place seems counterproductive. Instead, making felons live in prison, reflecting on their actions, gives them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes. No one would be able to live with themselves if they were involved with an innocent man being wrongfully executed. Eliminating capital punishment would make that fear…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I was a member of the state legislature in State X and one of my colleagues would introduce a measure to reinstate the death penalty, my vote would be definitely against. In our constitution, the 8th Amendment prohibits the court from subjecting criminals to “cruel and unusual punishment” which includes death penalty. I support that concept because if death penalty becomes legal in United States a lot of people might find themselves on that death table for reasons that are not worth it. Firstly, a lot of the people who are in jails for the rest of their lives are not murderers. Secondly, everybody makes mistakes including jury who might make a big mistake that will cost somebody their life. And thirdly, death penalty might not be as terrifying as it seems.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays