Preview

Pros And Cons For Mr Wilingham

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
132 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons For Mr Wilingham
I don’t feel like I know enough to decide if Mr. Wilingham is an innocent man, but I don’t think a prison informant should be allowed to testify in any court case. I wouldn’t consider a prison informant a reliable source of information and plus people with more power can use it to their advantage and coerce the informant into doing something corrupt. They shouldn’t have gone ahead with the execution based on all the current finds. I don’t feel like Mr. Willingham received a fair trial especially when the investigators weren’t even adequately trained arson experts. This case should definitely have an impact on the legal status of the death penalty, whereas if there are so many discrepancies in a case they shouldn’t be allowed to move forward
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Port arthur- the legal response
    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Port arthur- the legal response

    On the morning of Sunday 21st April 1996, a young Hobart man, Martin Bryant armed himself with three high powered automatic firearms and a large quantity of ammunition and then drove to Port Arthur. North of Port Arthur, he entered the home of a couple he briefly met as a child. Inside he started his rampage, shooting them both. Once he arrived at the Historical Site Port Arthur he ate a meal at the Broad Arrow Café. He then waited till his meal was finished to take his rifle from his bag and began to indiscriminately shoot around the crowded Cafe. Within the first 90 seconds, 20 people had died and 12 were injured. The man then moved to the adjacent car park, where he shot and killed four more people and added to the toll of injured people as well. After shooting at people in the grounds of the Historic Site, he maneuvered into his car and drove up the former main entrance road to the original toll booth. In this area, seven more people were killed in two separate incidents, during which he stole a victim’s car and abandoned his own. Driving north to a General Store, he killed another person and took one hostage then drove back to the place of his first killings, firing random shots at vehicles along the way. At the house, he continued to set fire to the stolen car and then took his hostage inside. Through the afternoon and night, shots were fired at police officers on the scene. At some point during this time, Bryant killed the hostage. When morning arrived, he set fire to the house and was captured by police as he fled. By the time the incidents had finished he had killed 35 people and injured 18. . Bryant had 72 criminal charges pressed against him and 551 witness statements were entered. After initially pleading “not guilty” to 72 charges, his plea was changed after conversations with his lawyer. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole on all 35 murder charges, plus 21 years for each of the remaining counts of the indictment.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of Making A Murderer By Jeff Truesdell
    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of Making A Murderer By Jeff Truesdell

    Another article I would like to discuss is from People magazine written by Jeff Truesdell, Neighbors of Making a Murderer's Steven Avery Speak Out About His Guilt or Innocence: 'Those of Us Who Live Here Know He's Guilty.’ In this article, Jeff Truesdell interviewed locals of Manitowoc County; Steven Avery’s neighbors. The neighbors paint an incredibly different picture than what is provided in Making a Murderer. The neighbors discuss how much safer they felt now that Steven Avery was back in jail, and how when he was released the first time they believed something strange happened. The general consensus of his neighbors was that he was guilty for the assault he was in jail for originally, and for the crimes he is in jail for now. One neighbor…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tshuanahusset's Murder Case
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tshuanahusset's Murder Case

    This aboriginal man claimed to have been there the night of the murder and testifies that Tshuanahusset was the one that murdered William Robinson. Yet, he did not firsthand see Tshuanahusset kill William Robinson, nor did he immediately report him for the murder either. It was fifteen months before Sue Tas went to the authorities with information on the murder, and this rose no suspicion for neither the authorities nor the judicial system. The fact that Sue Tas waited this long to inform the authorities rises suspicion that perhaps he was lying because there was belief that Sue Tas was Tshuanahusset killed. Although this suspicion was out in the open, the authorities and judicial system still solely relied on Sue Tas as the only witness and did not look further into these circumstances. This could have simply been that Sue Tas saw the opportunity to pin an open case murder on Tshuanahusset which would explain why he reported him much later from when the murder actually occurred. Also, Sue Tas was threatened by his own tribe and chief after he went to the authorities and reported Tshuanahusset. This information was set aside by all authorities because they simply did not want to complicate the investigation and close it as soon as possible. This information could have meant that Sue Tas did something that was unforgivable by his tribe and this would not be revealing information, but perhaps this could be that he lied about the information to falsely convict Tshuanahusset. Furthermore, the complication of Sue Tas as the only witness should have encouraged authorities and the judicial system to look further into the murder case of William Robinson and not solely rely on one witness, yet through they perfunctory behaviour they closed the case quickly and…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Making A Murderer: Is Steven Avery Guilty?
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Making A Murderer: Is Steven Avery Guilty?

    I would now like to look at the opposing side, those that feel police corruption is not present in Steven Avery’s case, or in the United States as a whole. The first article, from ABC News, is entitled Making a Murderer': Is Steven Avery Guilty? A Deeper Look Into Netflix Series. In this article, Ken Kratz, the prosecutor of the case, is interviewed. He discusses that the Netflix documentary leaves out several key pieces of evidence, which prove Steven and Brendan are guilty. The article makes a point in stating that Ken is now a defense attorney. Ken states that the filmmakers left out two key pieces of evidence: the car’s hood latch and the phone calls. DNA from sweat was found on the hood latch of Teresa’s car, and upon testing matched Steven Avery.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Injustice In Matthew James Nance's A Mockery Of Justice
    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Injustice In Matthew James Nance's A Mockery Of Justice

    In an article by Matthew James Nance titled “A Mockery of Justice” he writes about an inmate’s tale of what happen to David Martin Long in the late 80’s. While David Long was still incarcerated there was a reporter that was interested in writing about his story her name was Laura Miller and in 1994 she came to the prison to interview him. She wrote about his injustice in which he wanted to be executed but because Texas law had an automatic appeal process his execution could not be carried out and therefore no matter how many times that he wanted to oppose this the state of Texas denied him his execution. He tells her about his trial and how short the deliberation was. He goes into great, detail in telling her of his wrong doing and how he knows…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Amanda Knox Case
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Amanda Knox Case

    Which theses officers investigate postal crimes not murder. Knox says she was then bullied by the police. while being interrogated she says she did go do back to her house in the middle of the night a watched from the other room as one of her coworkers stabbed her friend. Why she lied I don’t know but when she did it made it seem like she killed her friend so they arrested her and her boyfriend on murder. The main part of the investigation is about to go down. The turning part in the case is when the appeals come in the first deny her and him because they believed they did it. Both of them were sentenced to 25 years. Two weeks later the DNA came back and it didn’t belong two Amanda or sollecto. The evidence was pointed at Rudy guede a friend of the people who lived under them. He was wanted for many burglaries in the apartment. He was immediately arrested in Germany but said he didn’t kill her. And also said Amanda and her boyfriend wasn't involved. After this he was sentenced to 30 years in prison. In 2008 Knox was acquitted of murder where she became a national sensation. From this case DNA has taken a whole new course and the technology has been approved so these types of things don’t happen…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Fitzsimons's Opinions
    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    Peter Fitzsimons's Opinions

    Peter Fitzsimons is a former Wallaby and a well-respected author and columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald. His ties to contact sports makes his position on the issue of concussions much more prominent to the public eye. Peters comments protrude a sense of authenticity that invokes a debate into the seriousness of the situation. The intended audience includes the players themselves, spectators as well the friends and families of the athletes. With that in mind Peter is able to successfully voice his opinions through the strategic use of Pathos filtered throughout the text. This includes the intentional phrasing at the beginning of the sentence where the inclusive pronoun ‘we’ (Fitzsimons, 2017) creates a sense of commonality between speaker…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science
    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page

    Forensic Science

    4. Why do you think the Willingham case is important? I think this case was very important because with out it we would not know as much about arson and test to prove it.…

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Is To Blame In 48 Hour's Grave Injustice?
    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Who Is To Blame In 48 Hour's Grave Injustice?

    Most think that the justice system gets it right most of the time. Unfortunately this is not the case. Many people go to prison or end up on death row despite being innocent, like Anthony Graves. In 48 Hour’s “Grave Injustice” we see Anthony Graves’ case; Graves was put on death row for a crime he did not commit. In this case like many others out there the fault is not in the system itself but the people. In the Graves case there were many discrepancies that came to light after the conviction..…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week 6 - Psy 270 Checkpoint Mind over Matter
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Week 6 - Psy 270 Checkpoint Mind over Matter

    The verdict of this case in my opinion is guilty but insane. I believe he knew that the action was wrong as he admitted that he had the premeditation to kill the police officer as well getting rid of his weapon. To me this indicated that he knew his actions were wrong, plus by fleeing the scene. If I were ruling this case, I would recommend that this particular criminal be admitted to an institution so he can be treated and…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Institutional Flaws In Criminal Cases
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Institutional Flaws In Criminal Cases

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Dna Is Used to Exonerate the Wrongfully Accused
    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Dna Is Used to Exonerate the Wrongfully Accused

    Possibly the single most greatest cause of wrongful convictions worldwide is eyewitness misidentifications. Although eyewitness testimony can be very convincing and persuasive before a judge and jury, not too many people have a photographic memory. Only 3% of people worldwide have a photographic memory. An eyewitnesses memory is not as accurate as watching a surveillance tape of the crime. Instead, eyewitness identification must be preserved carefully, just like any other evidence collected in the case. All the more reason that a witnesses statement should be taken immediately and then be asked the same questions at a later time to ensure the stories match up. If there is any major variation in a witness statement, they should not be allowed to testify during a trial. This may lead to unreliable information and wrongfully portray how the crime had taken place and who was involved. A 1982 case involving a man, Calvin Willis, was convicted by a jury and sentenced to life in prison with no parole for aggravated rape of a 10 year old girl. Blood and seminal stains were collected from the clothing and bedding and Willis was identified as a contributor…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Often times people plea-bargain in exchange for testimony this gives the accomplice an incentive to fabricate the truth. With this chance to lie you are creating an unfair judicial procedure. In theory, a petty criminal who is not very important is supposed to testify against a very important criminal in exchange for some sort of reward and there is supposed to be more justice because you've put the more important criminal away. However, since the reward is a reduced sentence, the incentive for most criminals is to give any testimony at all even if it is false. This is what is happening now and it is clear that this is undermining the criminal justice system. Justice is concerned with giving each their due. If someone is innocent, justice requires that they be found innocent and vice…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mr Williams
    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Mr Williams

    The recent deaths that has occurred in America is heartbreaking, but nothing new to society . Mr. Williams speech at the BET Awards was inspiring, however overtime it will fade into past events like day to night. The only way change is going to occur for the oppressed population of this nation is to develop unity . The development of unity amongst the oppressed population is going to be difficult because everyone boycotting has their own agenda and it's sometimes not in the best interest of the oppressed population. More so, there is another problem everyone wants to be commander and cheif and don't nobody want to be a solider fighting for the cause. This divide is the systems advantage on blocking unity and implementing change within the…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Wrongful Convictions
    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Wrongful Convictions

    I think that criminal justice officials who knowingly take part in such misconduct should be tried for criminal content and sentenced to jail time. They should also lose their license or be fired from their position. Many prosecutors simply get a slap on the wrist for withholding evidence that could prove the defendant to be innocent because they are getting a conviction nonetheless. Many of these criminal justice officials knowingly participate in the wrongful conviction of innocent people and they should be tried…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics