Preview

Presupposition in Semantics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Presupposition in Semantics
IntroductionPresupposition is originated in the field of philosophy and it was proposed by German philosopher Ferge in 1892. In the 1960s, presupposition entered the area of linguistics and became a significant concept in semantics. Later in the 1970s, Keenan introduced presupposition to the pragmatics to describe a relation between a speaker and the appropriateness of a sentence in a context (Levinson: 177). Hence, presupposition can be distinguished into two categories: semantic presupposition and pragmatic presupposition. This thesis is mainly centered on the exploration of presupposition in semantics from the perspectives of features and problems of presupposition. For the sake of searching for the solutions to the problems, the writer also brings two pragmatic theories of presupposition into discussion.

Part I. Two Approaches to PresuppositionIn the linguistics, two approaches to presupposition are semantic and pragmatic. Semantic presupposition views the sentence relations in terms of truth relations while pragmatic presupposition describes sentences as an interaction between individuals.

A.Semantic PresuppositionIn ordinary language, of course, to presuppose something means to assume it, and the narrower technical use in semantics is related to this (Saeed: 93). In semantics, the meaning of a sentence is based on the sentence itself instead of something constructed by the participants. The semantic presupposition is only concerned about the truth value of the statements. For instance,a)John managed to stop in time.

b)John tried to stop in time. (Suo: 130)In the example, sentence a) presupposes sentence b), that is to say, if it is true that John managed to stop in time, it must be true that John tried to stop in time. Meanwhile, if this proposition is false, the presupposition that John tried to stop in time still exists. However, only the truth of sentence b) doesn 't tell anything concerning the result whether he stopped in time or not. Based on the



References: evinson, Stephen C. Pragmtics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Researching Press, 2005. Saeed, John I. Semantics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Researching Press, 2005. 2005

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    study notes

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    sometimes called symbolic logic; deals with theories of meaning. semantics 5. the scientific study of word meanings general semantics 6. an early name for semantics philosophical semantics What does the Greek word semantikos mean ? signification Match the term to the description or person(s).…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Presupposition’s means what is assumed by the phrasing of a sentence; useful for hearing subtext and forces the listener to accept certain things in order for the statement to make sense. The first of my 5 favourite presuppositions’s, is ‘Possibility/necessity’. Before studying NLP this is the clue that was most readily picked up on through communicating with peers and students. It is interesting to see the physiology that accompanies such statements that fit this category i.e. shoulders slumped or the lighting up of the eyes. For dealing with younger people it provides one with an understanding of how they feel about where there going in life and how they…

    • 5252 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper is an assessment of Presuppositional Apologetics and how it can be used as a…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bad-Bad Words (Term Paper)

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Weinreich, B. S. (1980). On semantics. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.…

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philo1

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Linguistic Turn, observes that analytic philosophy in the 20th century is characterized by the linguistic turn. This is so for a lot of philosophers during this time believed that philosophical problems may be solved or dissolved either by reforming present language, or by understanding it better. It is linguistic because it focuses on the analysis of language (i.e. it focuses on the analysis of the systems of signs which we use to communicate with one another). terms in the project of the logical empiricists. One of the examples I gave you is in line with the term “simultaneity.” In order to say that two events happened simultaneously, we need to clarify the meaning of simultaneity. In this case, we give a definition of simultaneity, one that allows us to observe whether two events really happened at the same time.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another of Aristotle 's logical works, On Interpretation, considers the use of predicates in combination with subjects to form propositions or assertions, each of which is either true or false. We usually determine the truth of a proposition by reference to our experience of the reality it conveys, but Aristotle recognized that special difficulties arise in certain circumstances.(3)…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Blacks’ Law Dictionary, presumption is a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists, based on the known or proved existence of some other fact or group of facts. Also, a presumption is a conclusion which may or must be drawn from a given set of facts until the contrary is proven.…

    • 7180 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robyn Carston, Linguistic communication and the semantics-pragmatics distinction, 2008 ,Synthese 165 (3), 321-345 (Special issue on the Semantics/Pragmatics distinction)…

    • 2686 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE PREDICATIVE COMPLEXES

    • 3490 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Predicative complexes (or constructions) are structures intermediate between a phrase and a clause. Unlike phrases they contain two words I which semantically are in subject-predicate relations to one another, as one (the nominal part) denotes the doer of the action or the bearer of the state or quality, while the other (the predicated part) may be either verbal (an infinitive, a participle, a gerund) or non-verbal (an adjective, a stative, an adverb, a noun).…

    • 3490 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the discourse marker Well

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Since Levinson suggests that learning from pragmatic aspect on their own characteristics is extremely called for, discourse markers arouse linguists’ great interests in the pragmatic field. Linguists study discourse markers from different perspectives such as the coherence theory (Schiffrin), the syntactic-pragmatic perspective (Fraser) and the relevance theory (Blakemore). Schiffrin maintains that discourse markers function to “add to discourse coherence” and that coherence is “constructed through relations between adjacent units in discourse” (Shiffrin, 1987:24-25). Fraser approaches discourse markers from a syntactic-pragmatic perspective but he also…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being polite is not as easy as people think about politeness. People tend to think politeness as a simply thing like saying thank you and please in appropriate place (Holmes, 2001). For instance, children are taught to say please for being polite when they make a request. But the word please for adults can be more than just being polite, sometimes they use please to give more power or peremptory in directive. When we learn politeness, we not only have to understand about the language but also the social and values of the community.…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Personal Assignment

    • 2065 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to (Olanike: 2012), Discourse Analysis is the branch of linguistics that deals with the study and application of approaches to analysis written, spoken or signed language. And based on (Foucault 1972: 42), Discourse analysis as practices that systematically form the objects of which they speak. In simpler terms, discourses are more than just linguistic: they are social and ideological practices which can governs the ways in which people think, speak, interact, write and behave.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term ‘politeness’ has different uses. It is not so odd to hear this word in our…

    • 4383 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pragmatics is a subfield of linguistics which studies the ways in which context contributes to meaning. Pragmatics encompasses speech act theory, conversational implicature, talk in interaction and other approaches to language behavior in philosophy, sociology, linguistics and anthropology. Unlike semantics, which examines meaning that is conventional or "coded" in a given language, pragmatics studies how the transmission of meaning depends not only on structural and linguistic knowledge (e.g., grammar, lexicon, etc.) of the speaker and listener, but also on the context of the utterance, any preexisting knowledge about those involved, and other factors. In this respect, pragmatics explains how language users are able to overcome apparent ambiguity, since meaning relies on the manner, place, time etc. of an utterance. In pragmatics, an utterance is most often taken to be a linguistic action performed by a certain speaker in a certain place at a certain moment.…

    • 3907 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Media Studies

    • 11178 Words
    • 45 Pages

    outrage perhaps) and recognise the basis for shared interpretations. Occasionally, when watching a film, we may find that its technique or budget might militate against the aspirations of its creators. Then we might find ourselves sneering at its appearance and failure, responding to it in ways that were unintended simply because it is not effective in marshalling rhetoric.…

    • 11178 Words
    • 45 Pages
    Powerful Essays