Preview

Presumed Guilty Film Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Presumed Guilty Film Analysis
The documentary “Presumed Guilty” embodies various elements of how criminal procedure works in an inquisitorial legal system. In an inquisitorial system the accused is automatically assumed to be guilty (Ministry of Justice, 2013). It is through the evidence, investigations by court, the screening process, and Prosecutor the truth will evolve. The court plays an active role in determining the facts of a case and the conducts of the trial (Reichel, P., 2013, p.170). The judge is in charge of gathering the evidence, calling on the witness, questioning the witness, and the overall process and preparation . He or She is able to call on any witness while the Prosecutor and defense parties can ask follow up questions. In some cases, the judge allows the lawyers to present oral argument in public. The roles of admissibility of evidence may also allow the judge to act more like an inquisitor rather than an attributor of justice. As the trial is going on all statements are written down just as in a civil law system, but the judge can in his discretion decide what's admissible or not (LawTeacher, 2013. The typical criminal proceedings are divided into three phases: the investigate phase, the examining phase, and the trial (Ministry of Justice, 2013).The principle is to punish the guilty and protect the innocent. …show more content…
,2010). K was told by officials “his guilty and all you can do is confess “, immediately after being attained as well(Kafka, F & Others,1995). Just as Toni wasn’t read his rights nor informed of his charges, neither was K. The pretrial hearing (the file) was used in Tonio’s repeal case to gain guilt from the defendants. It allowed and provided more of a chance for the judge to come to the verdict of Tono being guilty once again. By the trial stage the accused was almost

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People delegate important personal aspects of their lives to professionals, but not without the risks of unethical behaviors. The word Professional makes one think of wealth and power, which can result in corruption; winning by any means necessary. In the movie The Verdict, Frank Galvin plays a lawyer who has reduced himself to being a drunken ambulance chaser (Brown, Harris, Zanuck, & Lumet, 1982). He is given an opportunity by his good friend, Mickey Morrisey, to morally redeem himself; not only as a lawyer, but most importantly a person.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this trimester, I have studied Paradigm II at Mahidol University International College, which is a core course for the social science division. This course learns about the major paradigms in social sciences during the twentieth century. In the past few months, a lecturer, Eugene Jones, opened a documentary film named Bowling for Columbine. In this film, a filmmaker, Michael Moore, try to find the reason of butchery in the United States. After I watched this film, I had learned that there are numerous reasons why Americans are so violent.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Movie Analysis: Doubt

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sister James and Sister Aloysius play a very important role in John Patrick Shanley’s movie Doubt, which is about the mistrust that takes place in a school directed by the church on priest Flynn command. There, sister Aloysius is the principal, so she is in charge of the student’s rights and responsibilities. On the other hand Sister James is a history teacher. Both characters are important for their way of handling the doubt.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    SCHEHR, R., & Sears, J. (2005). INNOCENCE COMMISSIONS: DUE PROCESS REMEDIES AND PROTECTION FOR THE INNOCENT (p. 50). Springer Science and Business Media B.V.…

    • 3537 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courts Real vs Fiction

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse or create simply to meet the needs of the fiction or make a specific point. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, unfortunately, people often only have fictional accounts of the law to educate them. The result, unfortunately, is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that interact with them. One of the main differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and real court processes is how the trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision (CA). Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to make statements (CA). Only rarely in that process will anything exciting happen. If one were to believe the portrayal of the trial sequence, however, seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as My Cousin Vinny or To Kill a Mockingbird, although one is a comedy and one a drama, represent trials as a place where shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kafka Trial Analysis

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The guards largely have no answers for the things that K. is asking of them, simply stating that he is guilty because the Law itself is attracted to guilt. They are just “lowly employees” and implicitly believe that who they are arresting is guilty because it has been determined by “higher authorities”. They are simply disinterested with the why of his arrest and largely his guilt, affirming he is guilty among his protests of innocence. The notion that the Law itself is attracted by the guilty is strange to me. By saying that, he infers that in one way or another because K. is deemed guilty, he would end up arrested by the guards, his fate was determined the moment…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criminal trial process aims to provide justice for all those involved, while it succeeds in the majority of cases, it effectiveness is influenced and reduced by certain factors. These include the legal representation involved in a case and the availability of legal aid, the capacity of the jury assessing the trial, the credibility of scientific evidence and the impact of social media on the trial process. Due to such flaws the criminal trial process is not always an effective means of achieving justice.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the outset, eleven jurors vote in favor of convicting the accused without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at trial. Only one brave juror refuses to vote. He openly admits that he does not know whether the accused is guilty or innocent and that he finds it necessary to simply talk about the case. What follows is not only a discussion of the particular facts of the case, but an intense examination of the personal baggage that each jury member brings to the room.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Escobedo Vs Illinois Case

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first time this case was tried in an Illinois court Escobedo was declared guilty. During the interrogation, the police took Escobedo to face the man who told the police about Escobedo being involved with the murder, DiGerlando. Escobedo cried to DiGerlando, "I didn't kill Manuel, you did it." This proclamation was the only thing that Escobedo had said that put him at the scene of the crime. (5) After the first mistake of Escobedo blurting out this incriminating statement, he continued to say things that later was used to convict…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pre Trial Process

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After a suspect is arrested and officially charged with a crime, he or she becomes a criminal defendant (Zalman, 2008). This step is significant in the criminal justice process because it brings several new sets of rules into play related to the defendant’s trial. Before a criminal defendant can be tried however, a number of milestones must be met and several obligatory processes must be completed. These procedures are designed to ensure that a fair trial takes place (Zalman, 2008). As criminal justice professionals must work in the medium of truth in their day to day activities in order to maintain their ethical and professional integrity, understanding the pre trial process is vital.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After viewing the film I realized that Erin's public self was pretty much the same as her private self. The reasoning behind this is .that she treated Ed, her boss in the same manner as she treated George, her boyfriend. Erin didn't take crap from anybody but at times she did let her aggressions take over. Most of the time these hostilities would lead her in contempt, but in the long run usually worked out for the best. I will admit, it was a good way to get her point across at times but she could have approached some of these situations a little differently. Take, for example, the night Erin met George. Even though George was being inappropriately loud, she could have asked him nicely to be quiet instead of chewing him out angrily, even after he tried repeatedly to apologize to her.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics