Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Powell v. Alabama

Satisfactory Essays
423 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Powell v. Alabama
Seaver Williams On March 25, 1931, on a train going through Alabama, a fight between nine young African Americans and seven young white men took place. Powell and his African American friends ended up throwing all but one of the white men off the train. There were also two white women on the train who claimed they were sexually assaulted. They were escorted to jail when they arrived at Scottsboro. They were put on trial on March 31 for the rape of the two white women and were found guilty and sentenced to the death penalty. However, they were not appointed a lawyer until the very morning of the trials and had no time to confer with them.
The lack of time to confer with their lawyers was viewed by them as unconstitutional so they appealed the case to the state Supreme Court. The ruling of the Alabama Supreme Court ended in a six to one decision. They then appealed their case to the Supreme Court. The Alabama Supreme Court’s chief justice claimed that they had not received a fair trial which was when the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case. The Supreme Court questioned weather or not the defendants had been denied due process of the law. Without due process, they would have been violating the 14th amendment. The decision ended in a seven to two ruling in favor of Powell. The court ruled that the defendants were not given reasonable time and opportunity to secure counsel in their defense. The Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to be given the death penalty without the right to counsel. The Supreme Courts ruling that they were denied due process of the law resulted in all charges being dropped and letting them go free. A dissenting opinion was given by Mr. Justice Butler. He claimed that since there were four separate trials for the nine defendants and different justices writing the court for each case, there trials were impartial and fair. He also stated that the defendants’ attorney had already been prepared and was in contact with the defendants at all times during the cases and, therefore, were given enough time of preparation and a fair trial should have been the ruling from the beginning. Powell v. Alabama had an effect on court cases to come in that it was the first case where defendants were denied due process. The 14th amendment was looked at more closely from then on. Everybody convicted of a crime has the right to an attorney and a counsil.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whether the Due Process Clause of the14th Amendment was violated when one of the justices in…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision: In 1980, Williams, seeking a writ of habeas corpus in United States District court was denied but eventually reversed by The Court of Appeals, in that the state failed to prove that the detectives acted in good faith. The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the decision, expressing that the condition of the body and the location will be admitted as preponderance of evidence under the exclusionary…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith V Cain Ap Go Po

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court case of Smith V Cain was an unusual one in which the defendant was claiming that many of his rights were being denied and he was given unfair trial. Smith was being prosecuted for the murder of 5 people in a Louisiana home. The only eye witness was an actual survivor of the shooting whose name was Burl Cain. Cain claimed that Juan Smith was one of the gunmen who murdered 5 innocent people in a Louisiana home. The court case climbed its way from the lower courts due to a writ of Certiorari on January 31st, 2011, and from that point on was sent through a series of juries and decisions in which the original decision of the case was reviewed by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court felt that the original claim by Juan Smith that his rights were denied, was plausible and that they needed to certiorari the decision to make sure that Smith was granted another trial. From the Supreme Court’s decision to Certiorari the decision it can be inferred that they wanted to make sure that Juan Smith was rewarded a second and fair trial that would give him a standing chance at actually being escaping the jail time that he would have to serve if he were to actually be convicted of murdering the 5 people in the Louisiana house that day.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The petitioner, Timothy Hurst, was convicted of first degree murder and the jury recommended the death penalty to the judge in Florida, who then sentenced Hurst to death. Hurst appealed to the Florida Supreme Court and was granted resentencing. The Florida Supreme Court rejected Hurst’s argument and reaffirmed his sentence. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti – Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal, Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law, which made the burning of the United States or Texas flags crimes. Johnson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail and fined two thousand dollars for his crime in restitution. Texas reasoned that the police were preventing the breach of peace; consider the flag a symbol of national unity. At Johnson's court trial, he was convicted of aiding, abetting and encouraging the burning of the Texan flag. This, in turn, made Johnson guilty under Texas state law.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. Describe the trials. Were they fair or unfair? Please include at least 3 supporting facts to back up your description. The Scottsboro boys…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scottsboro Boys Summary

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the year 1931, all nine of the Scottsboro boys Haywood Patterson, Charles Weems, Clarence Norris, Andy Wright, Ozzie Powell, Olen Montgomery, Eugene Williams, Willie Roberson, and Roy Wright are arrested and tried on charges of assault from fighting white boys on a train. Along with accusations made by Victoria Price and Ruby Bates that the boys raped them. Their trial begins April 6, 1931. All of the boys except for Roy Wright are tired and convicted, with the result of the death sentence, Roy Wright’s trial ends in a mistrial. Later the NAACP and International Labor Defense, fight to represent the boys. Even though there was no proof that the boys committed these crimes they were still tried as if they did. Even when Ruby Bates admits that she was not raped the trial still continued, and the punishment or convictions were still upheld. Instead of the boys trial going along the lines of todays court mantra of “being innocent until proven guilty” it seems that they were found guilty whether or not they were innocent. The boys suffered from intuitional discrimination because they were black boys accused of committing crimes against white girls. In a time when this type of crime was treated with more severity, than it would be if both parties were the same race.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mempa V. Rhay

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I agree with the court’s decision. I believe that counsel should always be present in any legal proceeding due the complexities of laws. Also, counsel also helps prevent against defendants being taken advantage of and mislead into believing something that’s not entirely fact. The only real way to get a fair trial is to be fairly represented in law.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro Trials, which tried and unfairly convicted nine innocent black youths of raping two white females (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica), was a milestone in the African-American civil rights movement, primarily because of the way racism influenced the outcome of the trials. Firstly, the protests held against the convictions mobilized the movement for equal rights. This was illustrated on May 8th, 1933, ten years after the last notable African-American March on Washington, when upwards of 4,000 people marched in Washington, D.C. in a bid for freedom for the Scottsboro Boys (Simpson). This example proves that the outcome of the Scottsboro trials led to demonstrations that protested inequality and encouraged equal rights for all American citizens.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregg V. Georgia 1976

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a 7 to 2 vote the court chose to uphold the judicial system under which Troy Gregg was convicted. It was found that the punishment of death did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under all circumstances. The cautious and judicious use of the death penalty may be found appropriate when used in extreme criminal cases, such as when a defendant has been convicted of deliberately killing. Justice Stewart stated that through American History, the majority of state legislatures have not found the death penalty to be cruel or unusual; moreover, the death…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty violates the equal protection of the law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.…

    • 6147 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas V. Johnson

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In response, the still angry Johnson appealed his case to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. This court, unlike the previous two, found Johnson to be innocent because it found that the First Amendment protected Johnson's behavior. To arrive at this decision, the court first quickly decided that Johnson's actions feel under the First Amendment protection of free speech because it was expressive conduct. Because of this, the state would need to prove that circumstances existed which would make the state interest outweigh the First Amendment. The court found that there was not a strong enough state interest to overrule the protection of the First Amendment and overturned the previous ruling. Upset with this, The State of Texas appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IV. What did the Supreme Court decide? Why did the Supreme Court decide as it did?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roper V. Simmons

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Part 2-In deciding the execution of a juvenile is inconsistent with the 8th amendment, the U.S Supreme court uses unconventional and highly contested reasoning.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays