Preview

Post Mortem Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Post Mortem Paper
Chemical Changes Postmortem and
Their Effects on the Determination of Postmortem Interval
Emily Morello
University of New Haven
FORS-2216-03-F15
Professor Peter Valentin
30 November 2015

Post mortem interval (PMI) is a commonly used term in the Forensic Science field meaning the time since death, or the time elapsed between death and the time of postmortem examination. Due to its assistance in suspect investigations, post mortem interval is very important in criminal cases. The more time elapsed, the larger the limits of probability. Therefore, the need for the findings of immediate chemical changes in the human body is inevitable. HodaFouad Abdel Salam, Eman Ahmed Shaat, Manal Hassan Abdel Aziz, Abeer Abdel MoneimSheta, and
…show more content…
The State v. Dreher specifically shows its liability as a reliable, evidentiary statement in today’s court cases. State v. Dreher, (1997), was an appellate division court case within the superior court of New Jersey where defendant John W. Dreher challenged the judgment of the State Court of New Jersey that convicted him of purposeful and knowing murder of his wife. In this case, the medical examiner considered a variety of different factors, with respect to time of death, including the concentration of vitreous potassium following the death of the defendant’s wife. Even though not an exact science, State v. Dreher (1997) stated that “the victim's potassium concentration level was 7.3 milliequivalents per liter” which led to the estimation that the victim had died ten hours earlier, give or take four hours (1997, p. 34). As noted by the medical examiner, “since her vitreous fluid was drawn at 5:40 p.m., she died sometime between 3:40 a.m. and 11:40 a.m. but probably closer to 7:40 a.m.” carefully stating only a range rather than a precise time (1997, p. …show more content…
60). In the end however, the court affirmed the defendant's conviction for murder in the first degree of his wife by overruling his claimed errors that the state had unfair prejudice against the defendant. His claims were overruled due to the medical examiner’s use of a widely accepted and distributed graph amongst all United States medical examiners by the Department of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. State v. Dreher (1997) proved that the medical examiner arrived at this estimate using the vertical coordinates, which represent the known potassium levels for more than one hundred people that died, and the horizontal coordinates, that represent the number of hours since death. This case therefore, historically revolutionized the use of this methodology of retrieving an appropriate time interval since

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It troubled him that the Judge Teel described Nancy’s condition as “unresponsive and hopeless” with “no cognitive purpose for her except sound and perhaps pain.” If Nancy feels pain then she is not in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). We did not know what was going on behind the scenes, but later it would all come to light. Our case bypassed the appellate court of Missouri and headed straight to the Missouri Supreme Court, with a little assistance. Our case was scheduled for review in September, along with a case that has opposite opinions as ours. In other words, the parents of a young man named Phillip Radar, that was diagnosed as being brain dead, did not want to let their child go, but the hospital caring for him did. Phillip’s heart was beating even though he was brain dead. Both of the cases were scheduled to be heard on the same morning in September, but on August 31st Phillip’s heart stopped and the effort to revive him was unsuccessful. His death left our case as the only one to be…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Lethbridge College Mock Court Exemplar video (2004) the Crown lacked in providing additional evidence, which can aid in building the theory that the accused committed this offence. The witnesses provided oral evidence, which can attest to the accused committing this offence; however, without any physical evidence, the Crown could not prove the facts beyond a reasonable doubt. The Crown could not demonstrate the fact that the substance was indeed poison, by either providing a certificate of analysis, or a container with a label of radiator fluid.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Selavka’s presentation ranged on the many different aspects of Forensic Toxicology. The first part of his discussion centered on the types of drugs toxicologist are interested in. Drugs that were mentioned included benzodiazepines, depressants, opiates, cocaine, amphetamines, marijuana and alcohol. Dr. Selavka pointed out that Alcohol stands out from the other drugs as it is the largest contributing factor to vehicle related accidents as well as consequently deaths. Dr. Selavka also included regular toxicologist studies such as the testing for carbon monoxide, cyanide, inhalants, metals, pesticides and…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brewster v. University Hospital is a case that deals with informed consent, in this case the plaintiff seemed to be wronged in the sense that their child was not given the best opportunity for a full recovery. The defendant, however, believes no wrong has been done since the professionals are certain that the diagnosis was best for the patient. The argument develops in the sense that the parents of the patient were not informed of all the different diagnosis, and how this illness could affect their child’s brain development. The patient suffered from hyperbilirubinemia, or jaundice, which seems to be of a normal occurrence for many infants, but it must be controlled because high levels of bilirubin causes great damage to the brain. This was part of the information the Brewster’s were not informed of, along with the fact that there is a much more aggressive form of diagnosis for this illness, which is blood…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Daubert, and Kumho, make it clear that the day of the expert, who merely opines, and does so on basis of vague notions of experience, is over. Experts are now held to a level of accountability that requires factual predicates, in historical fact, or in competent evidence, which allows a factfinder to independently verify the accuracy of the expert’s results. Absent such reliable verification, the expert’s opinion is not admissible. Choudek’s failure to test his hypotheses in a reliable manner or to validate his hypotheses by reference to generally accepted scientific principles as applied to the facts of this case renders his testimony on the cause and origin of the fire unreliable and therefore inadmissible under Daubert and Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 104.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A rare criminal case comes out to court, the case is on an out of hospital birth of two twins. The convict is a 57-year-old Utah midwife who was sentenced to half of a year in prison. The midwife committed manslaughter, the judge finally decided after he calls the trial, the most difficult trial he has ever had to decide. The midwife told the parents of the twins that she could surely deliver the twins safely, but whenever one baby came out purple and unable to breathe, Sorensen used outdated techniques and equipment that was too bulky for the young infant. This resulted in suffocation and the baby did not make it. In the courtroom, Sorensen tried to explain to the judge how she had delivered over a thousand physically fit and healthy babies,…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. What are two of the ways that a forensic pathologist might use to help determine the time of death?…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. How can digestion rates give information to forensic scientists about the time of death?…

    • 543 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Complete Autopsy Report

    • 714 Words
    • 9 Pages

    bump and bruising on skull suggests she has a fractured skull maybe hit with a hard…

    • 714 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Gifford v. Mateka, an unreported case from out of Division III, the defendants moved for summary judgment, in part, because they claimed the statements of one of the plaintiff’s experts, a toxicologist, were insufficient since he was not qualified to give medical opinions. No. 25886-2, 2001 WL 819067, at *4 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). The court held that the toxicologist “was qualified to link exposure to mold with the type of respiratory and other harm [plaintiff] alleged in her complaint.” Id. The court also held that although the case involved obscure matters beyond the comprehension of a lay juror, “it does not follow that only testimony by a medical doctor can suffice.” In fact, the court held that “given the particular source of harm alleged in the complaint—mold—the expertise of a toxicologist was required to clarify an obscure factors.”…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After watching Peter Donnelly: How juries are fooled by statistics (Donnelly, 2005), I learned that the use of statistics is very important to the medical field. In the case of Sally Clark, the mother who was convicted of murdering her children, statistics proved that she was innocent.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D. , Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Vs Grand Jury

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Along the way and in 1987, these 2 house staffers will be taken before a grand jury for possible murder charges and while the grand jury will not charge them with murder, it will charge them with 38 counts of gross negligence &/or gross incompetence. Under New York law, the investigative body for these charges was the Hearing Committee of the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct and between April 1987 and January 1989, this committee will have conducted 30 hearings at which 33 witnesses, including expert witnesses in toxicology, emergency medicine, and chairmen of internal medicine departments at six prominent medical schools will testify, and many of whom will state under oath that they had never heard of the interaction between…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Resomation is an alternative to cremation that helps the funeral industry and cuts down mercury emissions. The new technique of disposing a corpse is still not welcomed into potential clients mind frame do to the lack of information on the left over liquid once resomation is completed. I propose more research to be done on the liquid left behind and that the data collected to be shared with the general public. The research will be conducted within two years and six months with the result being a press release of our findings. I am asking for 1,388,800 dollars to fund this research and two years and six months to complete the project. With our findings clientele will be more aware of resomation and the components of the liquid that remains after completion.…

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Establishing a limited time frame for the claimant to recover damages is severely restrictive as hours or minutes should not be a relevant factor in situations involving the death of a beloved person. In Taylor v Somerset Health Authority, the claim for damages failed despite the claimant learning of the victim’s death within minutes. This requirement is seen as undeveloped as the trauma of losing a loved one does not make any difference regardless of the time limit. It is foreseeable that viewing the gruesome sight of a dead body might cause a psychiatric illness, even more so when the immediate victim had a close relationship with the claimant. Despite witnessing the death of the victim, it may not be sufficient for the claimant to recover damages if not deemed close enough to the event caused by the negligence, as seen in Taylor v A Novo. The case of Galli-Atkinson v Seghal saw a mother’s…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays