Preview

Politics of Backstabbing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
940 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Politics of Backstabbing
The Politics of Backstabbing
John C. Student
Strayer University
Instructor Kenneth Elliott
Principles of Organizational Behavior – BUS 105
March 7, 2010

Introduction

Legitimate political behavior applies to normal everyday politics, as illegitimate political behavior applies to extreme political behavior that violates the implied rules of the game. Betrayal in an organization also known as backstabbing. It’s an act of breaking or violation of trust that creates moral and psychological conflict within a relationship among two parties (“Betrayal”, 2010). There are many factors in this case incident that lead to illegitimate political behavior. This case incident involved Scott Rosen and his colleague, assistant manager of a financial-services company. Scott believed that he was a productive assistant manager until one day he realized that he was being backstabbed by his colleague. He’d observed strange behaviors between his colleague and his manager, also inappropriate and negative comments made by his colleague toward him. Sometimes, his manager and his colleague would have an unusual meeting behind closed doors. On other occasions, his colleague would asked a question that Mr. Rosen wouldn’t know the answer and make an inappropriate comment in the presence of his manager, implied that Mr. Rosen was incompetent and mismanaging his job. Due to the result of such illegitimate political approach, Mr. Rosen was demoted while his colleague was promoted. Shortly after the incident, Mr. Rosen resigned with many questions unanswered (Robbins and Judge, 2007, p. 497).

Warning

These types of incidents are very common in the workplace as some people would use political games to move ahead. In my opinion Mr. Rosen needs to communicate with his colleague and solve this issue in a friendly kind of way, to avoid any complication in the future. Be straight forward about his concern and bring up the comments and the abnormal behavior that



References: Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Factors contributing to Political Behavior. (2008, August). Retrieved March 07, 2010, from http://www.citeman.com/3729-factors-contributing-to-political-behavior/ Wikipedia. (2010). Betrayal. Retrieved March 07, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backstabbing ----------------------- 6

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJA 444 Week 4 DQs

    • 445 Words
    • 3 Pages

    DQ 2: Have you ever observed an unethical use of power? What types of power were involved? What are some examples of the effects of politics in your workplace?…

    • 445 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: Lincoln Steffens published the “shame of the cities” witch was a book based on the corruption in the 1900’s. By 1900, many cities in the south of America were controlled by political machines. These organizations consisted of full-time politicians whose main goal was to get and keep politicians power and money and also influence that went into it.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The use of detective-like reporting to unearth scandals, scams, and schemes, putting reporters in adversarial relationships with political leaders…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Framework

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bolman and Deal view the political frame of organizations as, “roiling arenas, hosting ongoing contests of individual and group interests” (p.188). I believe that there are two political issues within our department both revolve around the NCOIC, in a negative capacity. The NCOIC is a higher rank, it is easy for her to take advantage of her position within the negotiation creating an unfair advantage for her subordinates. This results in the subordinates conforming to her ineffective tendencies, creating conflict within the organization. “If the hard bargainer insists on concessions and makes threats while the soft bargainer yields to avoid confrontation and insists on agreement, the negotiating game is biased in favor…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto Case

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hellriegel, D., John, W. Slocum, Jr. "Organizational Behavior". 10th edition. OH: Southwestern College Publishing Company, 2004.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An Analysis Of Keta's Fall

    • 2414 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Some people tend to say remarks sometimes that they have no business saying, or they just intend to cause drama between individuals, unaware they can put themselves into trouble. When an incident occurs when someone said something about someone else and the remark was false or embarrassing; the root of the rumor gets confronted and looks lost like he/she didn’t know what he/she said. Sometimes people should keep their mouths shut rather than cause conflicts.…

    • 2414 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One Person's Response

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author explains ethical or unethical behavior in different scenarios relative to management in the corporate world.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Change Model Paper

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2009). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uncivility In Workplace

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, workplace incivility has been a newer term in the plethora of research available on unethical behaviors (Hanrahan & Leiter, 2014). Workplace incivility is an umbrella term that refers to low-intensity deviant behaviors with ambiguous intent to harm the target, in violation of workplace norms for mutual respect. These uncivil behaviors are typically rude and discourteous, displaying a lack of regard toward others and often include demeaning remarks and activities like not listening to others (Andersson & Pearson, 1999; Porath & Pearson, 2009). A dissection of the above definition, points out three components of workplace incivility: violation of workplace norms and respect, ambiguous intent, and low intensity (Andersson & Pearson, 1999). The very first part is a violation of organizational norms. Although organizations have their unique work culture yet they all agree on certain minimum acceptable norms, expectations and interactional conduct from its employees. Uncivil acts disturb this kind of agreement and unsettle the very well-being of the organization as well as its employees (Andersson & Pearson, 1999; Lim, Cortina, & Magley, 2008). The second component is the ambiguous intent behind the workplace uncivil behavior. Research…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Watergate Today

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The arena of politics is a different reality then the one we all live in on a day to day basis. Politicians are looking to be both powerful and popular and in order to do that you have to decide to be okay with not always following your word and doing things in a not always totally ethical manner. However, I believe there is a fine line even in the world of politics that shouldn’t be crossed. I fully understand Nixon’s want to create the “Plumbers” security group to watch leaks from the White House, and those men may have had to do illegal things to accomplish that, but that was reactive behavior (Davidson & Lytle, 2010, p 396). Proactive behavior, like having the men break into the hotel to plant a wire, is much more deceitful because you had to come up with the plan yourself rather then reacting to someone else’s behavior (Davidson & Lytle, 2010, p 396).…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ASAP Code of Ethics

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One example that I have had is when I worked at City Hall Annex. I was working as a temp the summer of 2011. It was obvious that Lucy, the Director of Accounting had something against Karla, Receptionist. Lucy broke the ASPA Code of Ethics many times as she humiliated and discriminated Karla from applying for a higher position, Lucy used excuses that Karla made many mistakes in her paperwork. It was later known…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groups and Teams

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to explain the differences between a group and a team. The importance of workplace diversity in an organization will also be examined and how it relates to team dynamics in the workplace.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The information that will be discussed in my portion of Chapter 10 leading difficult people is a continuation of identifying two archetypes bullies and backstabbers. A brief discussion of how the seven rules for dealing with difficult people applies to approaching bullies and backstabbers. The chapter later goes on to discuss several methods that can be utilized to handle the malicious behavior of bullies and backstabbers and the three key points that will support those methods.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical issues we face

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Observance of improper business practices conducted by managers or fellow employees can cause an ethical dilemma. In such cases we often ask ourselves…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blackmail in Politics

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The story is called “Blackmail in Politics”, and I immediately understood the essence of this story. The story is about politicians and the blackmail in politics. The main characters are: James Howden, Margaret Howden, Harvey Warrender, and Brian Richardson. James Howden was the Prime Minister of Canada. All his life he dreamed of becoming Prime Minister and yet has achieved his goal, but not in the best way. For the sake of his dreams, he made a deal that could ruin him in any day. But he took the risk. By nature he was very calm, soft, and slightly fearful. He had a beloved wife, Margaret. He loved and respected her, although repeatedly lied, hid the truth from her about the deal. Harvey was the cabinet minister, The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. He was a rival of James. James and Harvey were contenders for the Prime Minister of Canada, and they had equal opportunities to win. Harvey was more successful than James, he had a big following in the party, and he was respected among the people. Harvey was selfish. He had a son, Howard, who committed suicide. There was a raid to France; it was the first mission of Howard. When the navigator was wounded, Howard left the pilot`s seat and refused to fly. Then the navigator was dying. His father knew the truth about his son , but he built the legend of a hero`s death, in order to save his job. And another character, a very important character is Brian Richardson. He was the director of Howden`s party. He was an honest, hard-working, friendly person, who respected his boss.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics